Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) 1 2 3
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Wyświetl załącznik 7483758

Gosh, when you put it that way, it sounds really bad! Somebody should take a look at this docket, it sounds messy.

(If only someone could explain what's going on, this seems very uncharitable and not understanding.)


The Judge: ah but he is retarded, sanctioned for $100, which I will allow him to challenge me on paying multiple times for another year or so.
 
One nitpick here:

1749577976752.webp

That would have been the perfect place for a footnote, or even main paragraph mention, reminding the court that Greer is still lying about his physical address. Not strictly necessary, but it would really drive home how absolutely nothing Greer says can be trusted.

1749578103293.webp

So many lulz foreshadowed in a single word.
 
Yeah, the August 8 scheduling conference was set way back in December at ECF 206. You'll also note that it was specifically scheduled to be handled by the District Judge and not the Magistrate:
Wyświetl załącznik 7483712

The fact that it's now canceled, presumably at Barlow's direction, gives my shriveled, blackened "nothing ever happens" heart a faint beat of hope. 🌈
I take it more to mean the Clerks are now paying very close attention. They got dragged into Shitlip's lies. So the Clerks are starting to ask questions.
 
Yeah, the August 8 scheduling conference was set way back in December at ECF 206. You'll also note that it was specifically scheduled to be handled by the District Judge and not the Magistrate:
Wyświetl załącznik 7483712

The fact that it's now canceled, presumably at Barlow's direction, gives my shriveled, blackened "nothing ever happens" heart a faint beat of hope. 🌈
Sorry to tell you this, but it is likely that Nothing is happening. Barlow's clerk most likely cancelled the Scheduling Conference because June 10th is less than 60 days away from August 8th. 60 days is important, because that's how long a defendant gets to answer a complaint if they choose to waive summons, which is something that they would normally be expected to do in order to save costs. So even if Shitlips found the John Does, and they waived service asap, they would still have 60 days to file an answer or motion to dismiss. It does not make any sense to have a scheduling conference before then, so the Clerk likely cancelled it for that reason.

tl;dr Judge thought we'd be further along in December, because the Judge has learned nothing. Also, Nothing ever Happens.
 
I hope we get a filling with the whole conversation about paying today. I want to see the response email from Hardin saying "I prefer cheque, but you can also do x,y,z". Some might see it as overkill, but pushing in the judge's face that Rat Mouth is deliberately lying to the court and sending selectively clipped email convos never hurts in my book.
 
Hopefully we're not even finished with filings for today. Hardin has yet to make a specific response in opposition to ECF 333, Greer's fucky little motion to again reconsider the sanctions order. Hardin has touched upon it lightly in a couple of recent docs but he did say he "will oppose that latest motion in due course" and I'm really, really, really jonesing for him to make that oppo a blistering (BUT BRIEF) illustration of Greer's flagrant disrespect for the court and its officers. I want to see words like "contempt," "defiance," "mockery," and "malice." I'll even overlook "mendacity" if he's feeling cute, as long as he really hits Barlow between the eyes with what a flaming bag of shit Greer and his motions are.

1749577831731.webp
 
I hope we get a filling with the whole conversation about paying today. I want to see the response email from Hardin saying "I prefer cheque, but you can also do x,y,z". Some might see it as overkill, but pushing in the judges face that Rat Mouth is deliberately lying to the court and sending selectively clipped email convos never hurts in my book.
That probably was the entirety of it already filed. No way russ even inquired a about other ways to pay.
 
Hardin has yet to make a specific response in opposition to ECF 333, Greer's fucky little motion to again reconsider the sanctions order. Hardin has touched upon it lightly in a couple of recent docs but he did say he "will oppose that latest motion in due course"
Ignoring everything else, doesn't the Defense have some time period to respond to a motion, even one as fucky stupid as that?

They can respond quicker (and in fact, some motions get moved by both parties, saying "Judge we both think we should take Christmas off, plz approve") but they do get a set time, I believe.
 
Hardin’s filings today gave me a bit of vertigo. It’ll end one day and soon and so fast we’ll forget what the ruinous expense (for Null sadly) of making this particular retard go away has taught us all: a deep contempt for procedural dispute resolution technologies.
 
That would have been the perfect place for a footnote, or even main paragraph mention, reminding the court that Greer is still lying about his physical address. Not strictly necessary, but it would really drive home how absolutely nothing Greer says can be trusted.

Is that even relevant anymore? This case has been going on for so long that Greer was evicted (or moved out, I forget which) from that address. He's been including his (presumed) current address as a part of all of his filings lately.

address.webp

Hopefully they've got a better gate than the last place.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Ignoring everything else, doesn't the Defense have some time period to respond to a motion, even one as fucky stupid as that?

They can respond quicker (and in fact, some motions get moved by both parties, saying "Judge we both think we should take Christmas off, plz approve") but they do get a set time, I believe.
It's a motion, so typical motion deadlines in the District of Utah apply. But Shitlips filing his motion for reconsideration or filing any kind of motion for a stay does not affect the sanctions order that is already in place. He had to pay up at the deadline, nothing he filed would ever put that order on pause. He's currently in contempt of court, again.
 
Hopefully we're not even finished with filings for today.
Going by Russell's filing activity, he will continue to whine into the docket for the foreseeable future.

What are the odds Russell will motion to sanction Hardin for the 67 dollars regardless of what is on the docket now?
 
That probably was the entirety of it already filed. No way russ even inquired a about other ways to pay.
"Here's the proof they only wanted a check!"

>read exhibit
>the word "check" is never mentioned


Never change, Russ.

Is that even relevant anymore?
Maybe not immediately, I think Hardin made a point during a hearing that Russ better be checking his email because he's done with the physical copies. But he has notified the court about it, and the matter stood unresolved. It's just another point of retardation everyone is politely ignoring to move the case along, just like Greer's servicing statements with the false dates. Now would be a good time to wave these petty lies in everyone's faces.

(Also as mentioned above, I think that address he used today is still wrong.)
 
Hardin’s filings today gave me a bit of vertigo. It’ll end one day and soon and so fast we’ll forget what the ruinous expense (for Null sadly) of making this particular retard go away has taught us all: a deep contempt for procedural dispute resolution technologies.
Sometimes I forget about this thread until someone (usually Josh on MATI) mentions it and I think "holy shit that's still going on." The DMCA is bad enough, but the various judges allowing this continue for years are arguably worse. It's really eye-opening how someone can completely jam you up on court for years with very little money or knowledge of the law. I understand them not wanting to be biased against someone who's clearly a bit slow but it's become very clear that his filings are a malicious attempt to harm Josh and his website.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole