💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
He lost the lawsuit due to improper filing, iirc.
IIRC I believe Montagraph filed that one pro se and it was basically dead on arrival because Monty didn't understand the process around suing someone in another state. Nick basically thought that Monty's lawsuit against him would be a repeat of his previous one and it would basically just be an opportunity for Nick to have a good chuckle on stream. He seemed genuinely shook when Monty actually secured competent local counsel and brought a legit defamation lawsuit against him in Minnesota to the extent that he was kind of in denial/paralyzed as to what to do for the first couple of months.
 
"He lost a defamation suit against someone that called him a pedophile, therefore he is a pedophile"

Or, maybe he lost the lawsuit because the guy proved he DIDN'T call him a pedophile!
He didn't. He did it pro se and botched the case, which often happens when you're not a lawyer. You know, like Ty Beard, an actual lawyer, botched Vic's case by not knowing how to notarize an affidavit. Nick, the slithering faggot, wants to pretend that somehow proves the false allegations were true.
$420,000? Is this nigger retarded? This is David Stebbins level lunacy. Remember, this guy passed the bar at one point. He seriously thinks he'll get that much from a state agency carrying out a ministerial duty required by law pursuant to a valid advisory opinion from a judge?
ETA here rather than bump the thread back by editing a post five pages back, but I meant "court" and not "agency."
Nick is so wet brained he thinks playing the suicide card will earn him pity and thus leave him alone.
I wish he could foresee what would be the actual response. It would make the hilarity over Lowtax offing himself look tame. Unlike Lowtax, though, he wouldn't have an active thread for more than a month or two after croaking. Then he'd be forgotten.
"You want me to die, but you complain about ME wanting someone to die? Clearly you're all hypocrites!"
Mama K never did that, and I don't think the person he's shrieking insanely at ever has either. Fuck that, she's not the Kiwi Farms, and even lots of people here don't want him to die. I'm not in that group, I'd be totally fine with him walking into an open manhole and choking to death on shit in a sewer.
So passing law school and bar really does not tell anything about competency?
It tells that, at one point, he was competent to pass the bar.
 
Mama K never did that, and I don't think the person he's shrieking insanely at ever has either. Fuck that, she's not the Kiwi Farms, and even lots of people here don't want him to die. I'm not in that group, I'd be totally fine with him walking into an open manhole and choking to death on shit in a sewer.
I don't want him to die. I want him to suffer in jail for a long time where he can't do any harm.

I just don't care if he does die, because he makes the world a worse place.

Wonder how long he's going to stick with that joke.
Until he stops getting turned on by it.
 
I wish he could foresee what would be the actual response. It would make the hilarity over Lowtax offing himself look tame. Unlike Lowtax, though, he wouldn't have an active thread for more than a month or two after croaking. Then he'd be forgotten.
Fuck that, she's not the Kiwi Farms, and even lots of people here don't want him to die. I'm not in that group, I'd be totally fine with him walking into an open manhole and choking to death on shit in a sewer.
I can already hear the headlines: "gay, polyamorous conservative lawyer, father of 5, and Youtube personality bullied to death by gangstalker forum".

Any mention of the coke, child neglect, racism, pedo jokes, burnt bridges, or felony conviction, if they're included at all, will be buried-lede afterthoughts. LFJ, Keffals, and a litany of shitlib rags will come out to posthumously sing eulogies to the Austere Scholar of Balldos and Undocumented Pharmaceuticals.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
He didn't. He did it pro se and botched the case, which often happens when you're not a lawyer. You know, like Ty Beard, an actual lawyer, botched Vic's case by not knowing how to notarize an affidavit. Nick, the slithering faggot, wants to pretend that somehow proves the false allegations were true.
That's equally as retarded, Nick is fucked
 
Also in the plea deal ut is agreed that there is no right to compensation. It was waved as part of the plea deal.
If they reneg on that I'll spot you the $50
To be fair Aaron, no one should expect Nick to understand Minnesota law.

Everyone saw that detail in the court filing, but it was generally understood to mean that the two parties to the criminal case agreed that the criminal court would not be requiring payment of criminal restitution pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 611A.04 and Minn. Stat. § 511A.045. None of that was assumed to bind anyone who was not a party to the criminal case, because... well... so as to not be misconstrued as giving legal advice or Monday morning quarterbacking the responsible professional that can be consulted with to double-check about any possible confusion on this issue, let's just say that for the sole purpose of the overall thread having an informed perspective, I'll just leave this here without further comment:

611A.04 ORDER OF RESTITUTION.
Subd. 3. Effect of order for restitution. ... A decision for
or against restitution in any criminal or juvenile proceeding is not a bar to any civil action by the victim... against the offender. The offender shall be given credit, in any order for judgment in favor of a victim in a civil action, for any restitution paid to the victim for the same injuries for which the judgment is awarded.
Minn. Stat. § 611A.04, subd. 3

Of course, nothing in this opinion should be construed to limit in any way the right of the victims to pursue a civil action against one or more of the responsible parties for the intentional and wrongful conduct of those parties in the destruction of the victim's property. “A decision for or against restitution in any criminal or juvenile proceeding is not a bar to any civil action by the victim ․ against the offender.” Minn. Stat. § 611A.04, subd. 3...
State v. Boettcher, 931 N.W.2d 376, 382 n.6 (Minn. 2019)

As the supreme court similarly noted in Boettcher, it is important to recognize that this decision should not be construed to limit D.C. or the CVRB from being able to seek relief through a civil action. See id. at 382 n.6. “‘A decision for or against restitution in any criminal ... proceeding is not a bar to any civil action by the victim ... against the offender.” Id. (quoting Minn. Stat. §611A.04, subd. 3...
State v. Harvey, No. A19-0049, 2019 WL 4582544 (Minn. App. Sept. 23, 2019)
 
Momma K outta get a protective order or whatever its called against Nick since he keeps making threats online.

Not because I think Nick would ever do anything than rage impotently to feel like a big man, but because it'd be exceptionally funny to have him be subject to a restraining order while on probation.

This is six dimensional Balldo chess. If Mama K gets a restraining order against me, then she cannot attend my hearings or stalk muh keeedz. Check mate kiwi fag.

As a lawyer, I can’t help but feel some sympathy for the Barneswalker. There is no way he is getting paid enough to deal with this guy. Imagine the amount of shower calls he is receiving on a weekly basis. I am also assuming that Nick is probably subtly threatening him with bar complaints should he step out of line. I really cannot imagine a client like this. Randazza can laugh all the way to the bank, at least.
 
Approximately one third of this thread's contents looks like this:

Wyświetl załącznik 7453813
HE'S GAY
HE'S BLUE
HE'S A CUCK
HE BEATS HIS WIFE
1749063335453.webp
 
I had a Catholic wedding and in Catholic weddings you don’t do personal vows you make up it’s just a formula. I went back and looked and there actually isn’t a specific vow of fidelity or not to commit adultery.
It's not stated for two reasons. First, adultery is an exceptionally grave sin as it's a direct violation of the literal wording of the 6th commandment, which no Christian should ever commit. Jesus makes this extremely and unequivocally clear, as do the Apostles. Second, marriage in the Catholic Church is a sacrament which means you have to adhere to the form, matter and intent of the sacrament for it to be valid. If you refuse to be faithful to your spouse, you do not have the intent needed for it to be valid.

If you can believe it, I was seriously considering a vocation to the Catholic priesthood for a long time but ultimately decided against it because I wasn't called to it
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole