Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
embarrassing and/or full of lies. russell can talk all day about how his failed attempt at an RO is “irrelevant to copyright,” but then he also needs to stop livejournaling to the court about how null/kiwifarms is a killer stalker site, as that is also irrelevant to copyright. he needs to restrict his bullshit to calling kiwifarms a “copyright abuse” site and leave out the other delusions.
I can not wait for the eventual motion where the judge replies "while the court sympathizes with Mr. Greer, his depression is not a relevant factor to this case." He'll explode so hard his face might even twitch.
 
really looking forward to the judges response to this
I hope it's just a docket order that says "lol...lmao even. Denied"

Judge should not entertain this bullshit any longer than it takes to tell this faggot "no." The Court has enough actual shit to rule on in this case alone that it shouldn't waste time explaining to the retard (again) that he's wrong, he's been ordered to produce the documents, and no amount of delay, excuses, or a case of the Mondays is going to change that.
 
"i dont want to pay the 90 dollars because my savings account is for business only!"

fucking lol
really looking forward to the judges response to this
I feel the judge would be a hella lot more lenient if the amounts had a few more zeros

As it is, the court spent a significant portion of this amount filing the stupid motion, and the judge reading it no doubt cost even more.
 
If it isn't obvious he just doesn't want the document out there because it is embarrassing.
Literally HOW?

How can this document be embarrassing then any of his filings?

Even that last filing it probably more embarrassing than this application which is probably just some plightsperging
 
Literally HOW?

How can this document be embarrassing then any of his filings?

Even that last filing it probably more embarrassing than this application which is probably just some plightsperging
Has it even been confirmed that the metadata shows that has anything to do with Null? What if it's against Taylor Swift, the well-known copyright offender?
 
Null and Hardin requested this application as part of inquiry into past legal matters of Plaintiff. Russell has attributed the loss of his ability to market his music to other sources in publicly-accessible filings, meaning KF would not be responsible for damages (if any). He has also possibly known of alleged harms by KF for long enough that he filed this case too late, which is what this application might show. Also goes to prove he’s a vexatious litigant trying every means possible to silence legitimate criticism.
 
He can't withdraw now without permission from Null.
Petition to have this affixed to the bottom of every page in this thread, see precedent 'You're gonna carry that gunt'.

Call me silly but I laughed out loud at how candid and to the point they were when responding to this absolutely retarded request
Greer is such a retard. If they stamped it 'Attorneys Eyes Only', they wouldn't be able to send it to him direct as he is not an attorney! QED.

Congratulations on compounding the evidence for your IFP fraud Russell.
 
Considering that ID LLC has no assets, expenses, or income of any kind, and just exists for Greer's larp, I would be shocked if Greer actually took the time to set up a business account for it. If he does then I wouldn't be surprised if he just puts all his hooker fund money in that account and uses it for that since they're "market research".

Also fucking lol, "I can't prosecute the case right cause muh depression"
If it weren't, well, Russel Greer, the King of the Coomers, I'd assume ID LLC was a plot to try and conceal financials from the court. It would be a stupid idea, but it'd be in the realm of sovcit tier fucking retardation that King Coomer almost, but not quite, could aspire to: "Oh sorry Ya Honor, I'm just a poor pooor weeetard. I gots no money, see? ID LLC? Why would you care about a business I've been working with? Besides, I -- I mean they -- don't have to reveal their books to ya, that's private."

But no, it's mostly for him to pretend to be a pimp businessman to whores, I'm sure.

It's a protective order. I'm not sure why the other party can't see a copy of the application but I suspect it's something odd about protective orders.
It's to protect Domestic Abuse cases and the like, I'd imagine? You don't want Jimmy Joe Bob to find out Annie Marie filed for a protective order after her 6th month with a black eye in a row.

Literally HOW?

How can this document be embarrassing then any of his filings?

Even that last filing it probably more embarrassing than this application which is probably just some plightsperging
"Mr. Policeman Teacher Sir, that mean ol' Josh and the Kiwi Gang made fun of me, and when I tried to trick a whore into sucking me my penis, someone sent her things that I actually have said and done and she told me no, and that made me sad, and whorefolk shouldn't be allowed to tell you no if you offer them good money to have you your penis sucked, and my pee pee stopped workin' for a while after they kept laughin' at me, and the pimp I usually go to showed me a picture of muh thread before telling me not to contact his whores no more. Mr. Policeman Teacher Sir, I has a human right to pay good money to whores to get me my penis sucked, and Mean ol' Josh and the Kiwi Gang tellin' people what I did without giving me a chance to EXPLAIN is causing me harm cause it's makin' the whorefolk run away. I respectfully request that ya' make him stop talkin' about me unless he can be nice to me."
 
Null and Hardin requested this application as part of inquiry into past legal matters of Plaintiff.
Nah, it's simpler than that. Hardin asked for it because Greer said it was easily accessible, and he'd readily provide it, and that it materially proves the facts of his case.
 
I cannot WAIT to see Hardin's response to this motion. I hope he succinctly points out that Greer was already well aware of the costs per page for getting this shit done, because Greer used those costs as one of his reasons for begging for more time in ECF 294:

Wyświetl załącznik 7445411

And Greer was graciously given two whole extra weeks BY HARDIN, and he still didn't bother even trying to do it until like three days ago.
Uh, sweaty, this is completely new information to the court
1748903582905.webp
 
"i dont want to pay the 90 dollars because my savings account is for business only!"

fucking lol
really looking forward to the judges response to this

Greer doesn't want to pay the $67 (which should only be around $10 if he wasn't a fucking idiot) because he's got $1,000 sanctions bill that the court slapped on him to pay in a little over a week. He doesn't want to pay that either, and I fully expect a similar motion submitted to the court around this time next week begging for them to reconsider the thing that was already considered and did not go in his favor.

I can't wait to see Hardin's response. The judge will probably just issue a denial as text into the docket as he's done with some of Greer's other recent motions. Hopefully he doesn't do so before Hardin can respond though because I really want to see him tear Greer apart, really show him the business as it were.
 
Does Hardin REALLY have to respond to all that shit Greer just wrote? Its all pure lunacy. Greer can't be bothered to just go to the court house and have them print out what he needs? The defense has to pay for the Plaintiffs own production costs? The court should have seen that the documents he brought up in his own motion are actually not relevant, despite him saying they are? Come on Greer.

I feel like at this point Hardin could just respond with "Plaintiff talks like a fag and his shit is all retarded", and that will do the job.
 
Greer is the gift that keeps on giving, but I'm getting increasingly agitated at how many times he's bringing up the "irrelevancy" of this information when the beginning of this entire saga was him bringing it up and saying it's relevant.

1748903668149.webp
Bennett even mentioned it in the original order all the way back in fucking February too.
1748903744141.webp
The sanctions for this should be huge, let alone the Steve Taylor bullshit that also needs to be ruled on. It already doesn't make sense to me that he got ordered to produce it by 24th February, didn't do it, then got ordered to produce it a second time without any penalty for the first non-compliance.
 
Does Hardin REALLY have to respond to all that shit Greer just wrote? Its all pure lunacy. Greer can't be bothered to just go to the court house and have them print out what he needs? The defense has to pay for the Plaintiffs own production costs? The court should have seen that the documents he brought up in his own motion are actually not relevant, despite him saying they are? Come on Greer.

I feel like at this point Hardin could just respond with "Plaintiff talks like a fag and his shit is all retarded", and that will do the job.
Honestly, I'm almost on the side of Mr. Hardin simply ignoring it and filing his status report at 12:01AM on the 4th saying "Greer has not provided a copy of the requested document."
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole