Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
15 Wrz 2020
Terminated
22 Kwi 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
6 Sie 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 127)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
6 Sie 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
15 Maj 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
28 Kwi 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
25 Kwi 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
19 Mar 2024
Terminated
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
16 Paź 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 155)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
16 Paź 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
15 Paź 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
Greer v. Moon
2:24-cv-00421— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:24-cv-00421
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Plaintiff
Last Filing
21 Cze 2026
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 525)
#
Date
Description
Filing
486
21 Cze 2026
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
26 Paź 2021
Terminated
15 Paź 2023
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
15 Cze 2026
Recent Filings
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010756599
19 Paź 2022
[10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
I think iota is conflating the threatening email Greer sent Hardin with the RO application which is due tomorrow and will not be appearing here under threat of US Marshalls.
I've just finished re-reading the novels. Elmore Leonard really was a master when it came to cowboy stories and crime fiction and the Givens books combine both genres.
The TV dramatizations were fantastic as well. If you haven't watched them, I strongly recommend. The first two seasons are a real treat.
iota, I’m a bit confused about this. Mr. Hardin said this would happen in his email to Mr. Greer, but I couldn’t find any info in the SPO about automatic ‘de-designation’. Can you help me out?
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The confusion arises because there's the SPO that was in effect for cases filed prior to December 1, 2023, and the SPO that is in effect for cases filed after that date. This case originally started in 2020, but was transferred to Florida and then back again in 2024. The language between the SPOs is a little different in terms of challenges to designation, but Greer's bullshit is not appropriately-designated in either case, so he's fucked no matter which SPO we're looking at.
The SPO doesn't remotely apply anyway, even if it were a settlement offer in good faith.
Even if it did apply it should be obvious that a lawyer can't answer a settlement offer without being able to show it to his client.
How Beautifully Blue the sky
The glass is rising very high
Continue fine I hope it may
And yet it rained but yesterday
Tomorrow it may pour again
I hear the country wants some rain
Yet people say
I know not why
That we shall have a warm July.....
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that is only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
The main reason it got sent back to Florida is that they did not want to deal with that shit and they knew they could get away with it despite being procedurally in the wrong.
I disagree. A venue change refreshes the tard shield that only finally starting to break after 5 years. Plus iirc Florida judge didn't seem particularly in our favor.
First, SIR, it's TardGuard™ thank you very much, don't make this an abuse of trademark case, too.
Second, the TardGuard™ really only applies to about half of the courtshit - those where the "harmed" party is (in theory) the court itself, so it can be lenient - I'm talking missing deadlines, filing badly, IPF®, etc.
The other half is stuff that harms the case or the defendants (and even here they minimize but cannot remove) - especially once in discovery, TardGuard™ is about as effective as perfume as bear spray.
The court apparently operates under a legal fiction that everything BEFORE discovery is "free" (or mostly so) for both parties, and so financial harm is minimized, but once discovery starts, the court admits that shit costs money, yo.