Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Can Las Vegas Metro even do anything for something that nominally happened on the opposite side of the state?
Here's the on-line form... well, 2 relevant questions.
2025-05-20_20-46.webp
I don't see an obvious place they list what crimes are reportable on-line, but I'm guessing "The opposing lawyer is asking questions about me." is likely not on the list.

Oops, here it is.
If you answer yes then you can't file on-line and have to call them, presumably so they can laugh at you.
2025-05-20_20-50.webp
 
Oops, here it is.
If you answer yes then you can't file on-line and have to call them, presumably so they can laugh at you.
Well, considering he's a convicted criminal for PERPETRATING that, he could claim he's a victim of being prosecuted and convicted of electronic harassment. Because that shit was totally unfair, just because he threatened to commit suicide on someone's front door doesn't mean he was harassing them when he did it just because they wouldn't suck him his penis.
 
Well, considering he's a convicted criminal for PERPETRATING that, he could claim he's a victim of being prosecuted and convicted of electronic harassment. Because that shit was totally unfair, just because he threatened to commit suicide on someone's front door doesn't mean he was harassing them when he did it just because they wouldn't suck him his penis.
Speaking of that, was that a felony and how long ago was that as Winnemucca explicitly bans you from even applying for a Brothel license if you've been convicted of felony stalking in the past 5 years.
 
Can Las Vegas Metro even do anything for something that nominally happened on the opposite side of the state?
Did it even happen anywhere? I know the real answer is "he's not being stalked so obviously not" but if we did for some asinine reason accept that a couple public record requests filed via email constitute stalking then where did that happen?

Is it in the towns that received the requests? Probably not since they are all tautologically different places. Is it where the Hardship was when he sent them? He could move around but where he lives could maybe work? Is it where rusty is? After all if you're actually stalking someone by following them around then it's where the victim is at the time right? That must be it. Whatever city shitlips was in when Hardin sent the email has jurisdiction. Case Closed.
 
Here's what LV requires for a Protective Order against stalking. Once again I don't think the opposing lawyer who lives in another state is going to qualify as no "reasonable person" is going to feel terrified of them doing their job.

2025-05-20_21-26.webp
I think he also loses on this exception in NRS 200.575
2025-05-20_21-31.webp
2025-05-20_21-31_1.webp
 
Are we certain that Waylon Huber is actually aware and informed about being a partner in Russ' LLC? We know that Russ' is willing to use fraud to further his aims (cfm the Hof letter). And his current aim is to acquire real estate for his brothel. So what better way to make his dream a reality then to add some local real estate agent to it to really convince the town council that he has a plan!!! note that I do not have a lot of knowledge about starting US LLCs. Where I live this would be impossible due to notary requirements, but I've heard it's far easier to start a company in the US.

That Mr. Huber is totally ignorant about and does not consent to being a partner in ID NV LLC is not something that matters in Greer's rather fluid mind.

And that's why he's sperging out about being investigated for his winnemuccan dealings, so this deceit does not get discovered.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Are we certain that Waylon Huber is actually informed about being a partner in Russ' LLC? We know that Russ' is willing to use fraud to further his aims (cfm the Hof letter).
The whole "W.H." thing suggests Russhole lied about that, too, much like the forged Hof letter.

Waylon Huber should be at least asked "are you aware this creepy weirdo is roping you into some fake prostitution scheme?" He just doesn't seem like a prostitution guy. He might be upset if he found out about that.
 
Here's what LV requires for a Protective Order against stalking. Once again I don't think the opposing lawyer who lives in another state is going to qualify as no "reasonable person" is going to feel terrified of them doing their job.

Wyświetl załącznik 7390214
I think he also loses on this exception in NRS 200.575
Wyświetl załącznik 7390225
Wyświetl załącznik 7390224
Some of those could be turned around and used against Shitlips himself.
The whole "W.H." thing suggests Russhole lied about that, too, much like the forged Hof letter.

Waylon Huber should be at least asked "are you aware this creepy weirdo is roping you into some fake prostitution scheme?" He just doesn't seem like a prostitution guy. He might be upset if he found out about that.
The safe suspicion is Russ got a talkin to By Waylin wondering just what the fuck is going on? Why are courts and lawyers asking about him and why do they think he is a Pimp?
 
Are we certain that Waylon Huber is actually aware and informed about being a partner in Russ' LLC? We know that Russ' is willing to use fraud to further his aims (cfm the Hof letter). And his current aim is to acquire real estate for his brothel. So what better way to make his dream a reality then to add some local real estate agent to it to really convince the town council that he has a plan!!! note that I do not have a lot of knowledge about starting US LLCs. Where I live this would be impossible due to notary requirements, but I've heard it's far easier to start a company in the US.

That Mr. Huber is totally ignorant about and does not consent to being a partner in ID NV LLC is not something that matters in Greer's rather fluid mind.

And that's why he's sperging out about being investigated for his winnemuccan dealings, so this deceit does not get discovered.
He was getting CCed on the emails between Shitlips and the Winnie city council. He cannot be completely ignorant of what's going on, though it's possible he's not aware it's not just an 'entertainment' business but a full on whorehouse Russ is planning.
 
I was wondering why Greer doesn't just try to fuck around in any of the counties closer to Vegas

Well his alleged reddit acount explains why.
Just_Win8682 • 1y ago
Jesus Christ! You must be ignorant. The Nye brothels closer to Vegas are notorious for being over-expensive. It’s common knowledge that if you want cheaper prices, go to the Northern parts away from Vegas and Reno.
That basically leaves him only Winnemucca (As Humboldt county otherwise prohibits brothels in unincorpated areas), Ely (White pine county otherwise prohibits brothels in unincorpated areas) Lander County, and Elko County

Ely allows brothels but checking their zoning maps, they never zoned anywhere to actually open a new one with the 2 current brothels being grandfathered meaning it appears to be seemingly impossible to open a new brothel.

Checking Lander County, they're only legal on one street in the entire county,

Lets look at Elko county, only Brothels are allowed in the City Limits of Elko, Carlin, and Wells

Lets start with Elko
G. Grounds For Refusal, Revocation Or Suspension: The following shall, without limitation, constitute grounds for refusal to grant a license to an applicant, or revocation or suspension of a license by the Board:
[...]
2. The applicant/licensee is financially insolvent or is inadequately financed;

3. The applicant/licensee has a history of financial instability;
[...]
8. The applicant/licensee has one or more business relationships with persons who would be denied a license for reasons other than financial instability or insolvency;
[...]
11. The applicant/licensee intends to utilize a manager or other agent to operate the brothel when the owner is not present and the manager or other agent would not qualify for a license under this chapter;
Well shucks guess good ole Russ can't find his dream there, lets see about Carlin.
5-9-8: LICENSE APPLICATION; FILING AND INVESTIGATION:
(E) The board may refuse to grant a license to any applicant who, in the opinion of the board, is not appropriate:
[...]
2. Who is financially insolvent or undergone a prior bankruptcy proceeding;
3. Who has a history of financial instability;

[...]
8. Who has associates that the board considers inappropriate for the operation of this privileged business.
Oh no, lets see about Wells
H. The board may, based upon just cause which includes, but is not limited to, the following, refuse to grant a license to any applicant:
[...]
3. Where an applicant is financially insolvent or is inadequately financed.
4. Where an applicant has a history of financial instability.
Well shit Guess good old Russ can't live his dream in Elko county.

Seeing these financial stablity and adequate financing clauses I went and rechecked Winnemucca's requirements, and I found out you only have to show financial stablity if you're a convicted felon, same for Lander County, I checked the agenda for their meeting today, Wednesday May 21st and meetings from the past 3 months and there's nothing regarding Greer, brothels, or any of his LLCs, same for Wells, Elko, and Carlin, no mentions of him.
 
Reading Greer's filings is on par with the first ice-cold sip of your favourite beverages of choice on a dry, sunny day. I love it.
 
I didn't really want to participate in this topic since it doesn't have anything to do with the current lawsuit beyond being another notch in the bedpost regarding Russell's history of vexatious litigation but if it helps settle the debate regarding ethics in sucking Russell his penis in either direction he never said he wanted sex during the four hour girlfriend experience

He said he wanted 'intimacy', because he's just a gentleman like that, and he expected the ho to magically read his mind and know exactly what he meant because he paid for her time and obviously whores are only good for one thing

This is in spite of him admitting that sometimes he's paid the hoes just to cuddle or make out (censored for gore)

Caveat for above, this all assumes you can take Russ at his word, but even in his best case scenario that he thought through and wrote down to convince the world of his plights he still didn't do anything to indicate that he wanted sex beyond a vague mention of 'intimacy' which could mean almost anything

(Sorry for Reddit spacing I feel dirty)
 
He went to a whore and as others pointed out he sat there for half the date just twiddling his dick waiting to go to a restaurant. Would you have made a move on Greer? You already have the 4k, and as his whore it isn't up to her to make the moves unless he explicitly told her to do that.
Caveat Emptor.

I'm reading a murder mystery at the moment. (How is it that I'm only just discovering the work of Thomas Perry? Every single book a total banger.) Anyway, in this book, the bad guy is knocking off whores and so the private eye who is seeking out the killer makes an appointment with a prostitute who fits the profile.

She is very explicit when she's making the appointment that he's paying for her time. Depending on how they get on, something else may or may not happen at the end of the date, but he's not paying her for sex because that would be illegal. (I'm pretty sure that the hooker in this negotiation is in Las Vegas, but it could be Texas.)

Obviously, most women in the sex industry care about things like their reputation and repeat business, so when a man is spending $4,000, they're going to bend over backwards to ensure that he has a good time. Presumably, this woman felt like most people would when confronted by Greer in real life. ie, there's no amount of money that could persuade her to have sex with him if she could possibly avoid it.

As an aside, this book is set in the world of high end freelance prostitutes. The going rate in the book seems to be about $800 an hour -- on a sliding scale. Around $2000 would seem to get you an overnight GFE. It does sound like they were milking Greer because of how vile and obnoxious he presents, but I'm sure lots of men aren't Adonises. Rejection of Greer seems to be based on his personality rather than his looks.

As you say though, Caveat Emptor.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole