🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.

Doe v. Bonnell 1:25-cv-20757 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-20757
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    17 Lut 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Defendant
  • Last Filing
    29 Cze 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 367)

# Date Description Filing
280 29 Cze 2026 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
29 Cze 2026  
29 Cze 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
29 Cze 2026  
29 Cze 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 281 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (766837)
Naw fam. If you're being recorded, always assume it's going to be shared with others

I agree with this in principal but at the same time it's kind of like wearing a massive gold chain to the hood.

Yes - it's dumb and irresponsible but it's still a crime for someone to steal it from you.

Also.. Pixie is a known retard and 70 IQ haver so she would be the exact type of retard to do this without thinking of the risks.
 
It's actually insane the footsies reception to Pakman dropping out, I hadn't realised just how much Molestiny had managed to spin the narrative in his favour. Just from reading his comments you would think he is the victim of a smear campaign from a crazy yet incompetent woman, and this isn't actually, you know, just the result of his own depraved, immoral actions.

Some highlights for those who didn't open the thread:
My favourite was the guy crying about the left destroying itself... in the community of a guy who has gone after all of his peers who were even slightly to the left of him.
 
Every month, it is mandatory that a DGGtard comes in this thread with a brand new account. He only posts here, shits up the thread for a few pages and leaves within 3 days.
@destinydefender you are either ignorant of the evidence of Destiny's malice or intentionally ignoring it to protect your e-daddy. Regardless, nothing you say will change the way people here think.

You dropped this. 🔺
You are clearly lazy and didn't read my posts because my only 2 contentions so far have been that he isn't a pedophile and he isn't a rapist, which is correct. If you want to argue otherwise then be my guest.
 
He's pedophilic and a rapist (by deception)
If you read this page beyond the first paragraph (which I know may be difficult for some of you) you'd understand rape by deception involves impersonation a person impersonation of a gender (tranny shit), or lying to trick someone into consenting to sex i.e. claiming to administer a vaccine through sexual intercourse.

Not even these internet lawyers call Destiny a rapist. They are smarter than you and you should listen to them.

this is the same cope that lav does when people say she hooked up with destiny lmaoooo
Lav letting Destiny eat her out is an L for her and it'll never wash away.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
She'll probably lose because her lawyers are retarded. Once she wins it will set a precedent for other people to sue Destiny.
Literally contradict yourself within the next sentence. Destinyfags might be the dumbest people on the internet. Daily reminder that you are wasting your youthful years defending a neanderthal sex pest.
Here are Pangburn's posts about the Pakman development.

Wyświetl załącznik 7380692 Wyświetl załącznik 7380691
He is now officially political poison. It's unironically over.
 
or lying to trick someone into consenting to sex
Does a false premise behind the nature of a recording count as a lie? Does secretly recording someone and pretending it didn't happen a lie? Is knowingly sharing a private recording of someone through public google drive link and telling them you only sent it to one person a lie? Because if none of these are lies then and only then can you make the argument that he isn't a rapist by deception.

Also why do you lose all rights to privacy because some video or photo exists somewhere of you doing something?
 
You are clearly lazy and didn't read my posts because my only 2 contentions so far have been that he isn't a pedophile and he isn't a rapist, which is correct. If you want to argue otherwise then be my guest.

"My only 2 contentions"

There is no purpose to record pornography of yourself besides sharing. These women are only angry they were caught.

You also argued that nobody's consent was violated. Jesus, it didn't even take 2 days for you to contradict yourself.

I actually agree that he got smoked by Finkelstein, but he didn't try to win to the greater audience. He only wanted to win to his own audience that likes his tactics.

The clip had nothing to do with who won the debate.

Anyways, Chaeiry is an unimportant and irrelevant side-character until she decides to take legal action against Destiny.

How lucky, her privacy was egregiously violated, but she's an unimportant side character so it doesn't matter. She stated she filed a police report, several people corroborated this, but presumably you're going to dismiss that too. The point of the Finkelstein clip is that you're an incel who's trying to live vicariously through a sex pest because your life is doomed for failure. And now that your e-father figure is having a mental breakdown, you feel the need to defend him so your life can go back to having meaning. It never did. He cares about you even less than the son he abandoned.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
It's actually insane the footsies reception to Pakman dropping out
it's pretty funny how surprised & upset people are. random reddit fags are expected, but seeing people like Whick soy out is funny. https://archive.ph/CGVVs

1747634850212.webp
 
Does a false premise behind the nature of a recording count as a lie? Does secretly recording someone and pretending it didn't happen a lie? Is knowingly sharing a private recording of someone through public google drive link and telling them you only sent it to one person a lie? Because if none of these are lies then and only then can you make the argument that he isn't a rapist by deception.
The American people should be thankful you aren't a lawyer. The way a victim is deceived is very clear in the article. I will link it again. Please read the cases thoroughly, ask yourself it is similar to what Destiny did, and ask yourself why no licensed lawyer is running with this nonsense.

You also argued that nobody's consent was violated.
In the second sentence of my first post I said Destiny was guilty. Sorry if you missed it. Maybe I should of put it in the first sentence?

The clip had nothing to do with who won the debate.
I didn't listen to the clip. I just gave my thoughts on the debate.
 
In the second sentence of my first post I said Destiny was guilty. Sorry if you missed it. Maybe I should of put it in the first sentence?
That's what a contradiction is moron. Just because made it within the same post doesn't mean you're not an idiot. If "he's guilty of revenge porn" and you follow that up by saying "There is no purpose to record pornography of yourself besides sharing. These women are only angry they were caught." then you're both saying consent was and wasn't violated, meaning you're retarded. You even gaslight like the sexpest.
 
Destiny didn't get her consent to share the video AND she knew the risk of him having the video. Sorry if these two statements seem contradictory to you. We're not all so dull.
don't you feel retarded having to come to a nazi terror murder website to argue about the semantics of your e-daddy's sexual misadventures
 
Pretty sure being retarded is a requirement for still publicly associating yourself as a DGGer, as our friend here kindly demonstrated.
 
Chaeiry agreed to have sex with Destiny. She was not raped.
The whole notion of statutory rape hinges on the idea that minors cannot render consent, and so it is similarly irrelevant if a minor agreed to be taken advantage of. If Chaeiry didn't know what she was agreeing to, why does it matter that she agreed?

I know this is all theoretical to you because there is a near zero chance you have ever been laid, but if she agreed under false pretenses where she otherwise wouldn't have, it's rape by deception. You can think or feel it belongs in some other category of sexual assault, but it is not "mental illness" to regard Destin as a predator or rapist. You read the next paragraph but nothing else on rape by deception legislature or case law because you're a retard who will stop the second you think what you're reading confirms your bias. Where will you shift the goalpost when Rose being underage becomes a matter of public record? Again, Destiny is more of a scheming rapist than a lot of people who have been put through the system for SA.

Your reaction to Pakman's withdrawal is very telling in that it is totally beyond your reckoning how a normal person views these sorts of behavior, and have to gesture to some made up notion that it's "not cool" for David to not want to pal around with a guy who records his sex partners without consent.

No matter the outcome of this court case or any other, you will still be the kind of pitiable fucking loser who looks at Destiny and sees something admirable or even defensible.
 
Destiny didn't get her consent to share the video AND she knew the risk of him having the video. Sorry if these two statements seem contradictory to you. We're not all so dull.
You claim to be defending Destiny, but it seems like you're more focussed on attacking Pxie. You say that there is no reason to record anything if it isn't going to be shared, though obviously this is retarded. That being said, even if sharing was the main reason to record you would still need consent. Most people only go out drinking to fuck someone but you still need consent to do it.

On top of this, Pxie acknowledged privately to Destiny that she was fully aware of how seriously he took consent, and also asked him to keep the encounter private between the two of them. This is one of the reasons that she was so willing to record with him, because she believed that he would keep it private.

You might say that this makes Pxie stupid, but realistically we're talking about a 20 year old terminally online Destiny fan. Of course she was stupid. Either way I'm sure she was aware of the risks that were involved with recording. Similarly most women understand the risks of being in a relationship with someone stronger than them, it doesn't mean they are at fault when their partners kicks the shit out of them.

You should not blame the victim for putting their trust in a duplicitous and manipulative scumbag who misrepresented themselves as respectful and considerate.

Destiny choosing to violate Pxie's trust and make her decision for her with regards to her own consent was reckless and abusive, and it contributes to a pattern of behaviour that he has displayed for many years.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole