Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
I would expect a late payment in conjunction with a motion to excuse his lateness
He won't pay because he will claim that filing a motion to "undo the things that he said directly to the Judge in the hearing constitute Excusable Neglect and he should not have to pay," will stay the order to pay.

He will then file another emergency motion after the deadline has past claiming yet more Excusable Neglect.
 
He won't pay because he will claim that filing a motion to "undo the things that he said directly to the Judge in the hearing constitute Excusable Neglect and he should not have to pay," will stay the order to pay.
I think he'll pay the filing fee because there's some something to be gained by paying. he might hit up a payday loan place for the cash. I don't think he'll pay the sanctions owed because there's no threat to dismiss his lolsuit.
 
I think he'll pay the filing fee because there's some something to be gained by paying. he might hit up a payday loan place for the cash. I don't think he'll pay the sanctions owed because there's no threat to dismiss his lolsuit.
A payday loan company had to sue him to pay up last year. He ain't getting any more payday loans anytime soon.

Edit; also just because the active portion of the case is mostly stayed does not mean that Hardin and Nulls collection actions for the fees awarded is stayed. He's late. Has no agreements regarding what is owed with the defendants. And the defendants do not have a valid mailing address for the plaintiff with which to serve collection actions. So the defendants may opt to reach out to Judge Barlow for assistance in this, as that's the conclusion Bennet seemed to come to. He's already late, is not in fact in forma pauperis, and does not seem to have taken Barlow's initial sanctions very seriously ("i can pay I just don't want to"). How's that gonna go?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
He's going to do exactly as the Magistrate tells him to do, because he's a subservient little bitch as long as it's not coming from Mr Hardin.
 
Retracting my previous "he's not retarded, he's malicious" analysis for a simple "he's retarded."

Losing his IFP status is some high-quality retardation on its own, but the whole "phone storage" cope is baffling. Google Drive is free, a subscription for expanded storage is dirt cheap ($3/mo for 200GB), and these legal documents are relatively tiny in the context of digital storage. Even if something had to give... why would it be the sensitive legal documents? Surely whatever else he's saving to his cell phone (whatever the fuck it might be; who fills an entire phone's storage??) isn't as important as legal documents.

He's clearly under a lot of stress, being wire-tapped by comedian Jim Norton and all, so maybe he just needs a chance to explain.
 
he whole "phone storage" cope is baffling
I think it's the first real proof we have that he's actively malicious, imo.

Because phones don't just randomly delete documents you've created. They might delete songs you've loaded, or some shit, but documents you made are more rare than photos, and precious.

Much more likely that he intentionally destroyed it (either right after filing in a fit of anger when it was denied) or after it was requested (the first being funny, the second being an actual crime).

Or he lost access to all his shit when he destroyed his phone by accident, which strikes me as not very likely.
 
he won't be able to get one from that company that sued him, but there's a lot to choose from including the arab bodegas.

it's not lot being even more late will cause the courts to dismiss the case.
It's a Sanction. Which means it's a penalty the court has slammed you with to get you to stop being a fucking retard. If you blow off the sanction and increase the retardation the court can increase the sanction until it is satisfied you are no longer a problem. Up to and including dismissing your shit tier plightsuit.
 
Up to and including dismissing your shit tier plightsuit.
And if you're a minor celebrity you'll pay right before this happens because money owed in the future, whatever the cost, isn't a real and there's always a chance it'll get forgotten or motioned away.
Yeah, and that is the kind of thing that ends up on your credit report for 10 years, if I am remembering correctly.
most, if not all payday loans don't report to the big 3. They might do credit checks but i don't have experience with ones that do. most of the time its a few paystubs. you can even be a state certified schitzo and get a loan.
 
Retracting my previous "he's not retarded, he's malicious" analysis for a simple "he's retarded."

Losing his IFP status is some high-quality retardation on its own, but the whole "phone storage" cope is baffling. Google Drive is free, a subscription for expanded storage is dirt cheap ($3/mo for 200GB), and these legal documents are relatively tiny in the context of digital storage. Even if something had to give... why would it be the sensitive legal documents? Surely whatever else he's saving to his cell phone (whatever the fuck it might be; who fills an entire phone's storage??) isn't as important as legal documents.

He's clearly under a lot of stress, being wire-tapped by comedian Jim Norton and all, so maybe he just needs a chance to explain.
He's too retarded to use Google drive. However, iCloud is the same price for 200 gb, and it's seamless.

I can't believe he tacitly admitted to actually writing those motions and everything else on his iPhone. In retrospect I suppose the screenshot attachments should have given it away, but damn son, no wonder all the I am 6 formatting. Even the Pro line has a screen that's too small to make word processing easy.
 
Even if something had to give... why would it be the sensitive legal documents? Surely whatever else he's saving to his cell phone (whatever the fuck it might be; who fills an entire phone's storage??) isn't as important as legal documents.

You don't understand,

Downloading pictures of e-thots takes up a lot of storage space.
 
I wonder, does losing his IFP status in this case negatively impact his ability to gain it in any future lolsuits he files? Like if he files another suit and tries to gain IFP, will the court see that it was revoked/reversed this time and say "Nah fam. That don't won't hunt. You gotta pay now."?
Based on the Stebbins cases and others, no, this doesn’t stop him from requesting IFP status in the future.

It’s a form you fill out and file with the court when you file your lawsuit. He has to accurately represent his financial status at the time he files which may have changed since his last lawsuit.

The opposing lawyer can challenge the IFP status and call for an accounting, but they should have some evidence to support going down that path.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole