Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Mostly. He just sounds like a guy playing Speak Out with a mouthful of marshmallow fluff and an unsucked penis.
Wyświetl załącznik 7331805
OT but I wonder if Russell finds things like this unbelievably offensive and bias to the disabled (IE people with his specific condition). I don't remember ever seeing him pick a fight with toy/game companies but if he thinks women can't say no to disabled men, perhaps someday.

On-topic, I think Russ is gonna pay everything he has to right now, and then if by some miracle the current considerations for dismissal don't bear fruit he will hold it over Hardin (and the court) as some sort of undue punishment he suffered because of Josh and his harassment, when the sanction(s) are to make Josh whole as far as prejudice before the court, and the filing fee came about because retard ape didn't think before he spoke when he knew the IFP status was in contention.
 
Even with the $1000 to Null and $400 to the court, that's only $1400.

The costs and fees awarded to Skordas for the Ariana Grande hearing was $1500, so he still hasn't been punished as bad as he was for wasting Skordas' time for ONE DAY in small claims court
 
Is there any chance that Greer fucks up so bad that he files the SPO himself in such a way that it ends up publicly on the docket and completely unredactet?
It's almost a certainty IMO, and then we have the hardest task of all - not archiving it on the farms, but instead laughing about it second hand.
 
I've never actually heard Greer talk, is he intelligible?
You get the gist of what he's saying but it's really annoying to listen to because you have to strain yourself to understand him. The finer details of what he says don't really matter though, what matters is the substance of his response and the judge's rulings.

He's kind of just on the border of needing an interpreter. It's like listening to someone talk with a really thick accent.
 
Now that I'm caught up...I'm gonna say it: Shit-Lips will fuck this up somehow. Whether he doesn't pay the filing fee in time, or whether he fails to provide Hardship Hardin with the court filings from his attempt at gaining a protective order, or whether he simply just shuts down due to narcissistic injury because the judge didn't kiss his ass and give him his way...he's going to fuck this up and it'll be the end of that.

I wonder, does losing his IFP status in this case negatively impact his ability to gain it in any future lolsuits he files? Like if he files another suit and tries to gain IFP, will the court see that it was revoked/reversed this time and say "Nah fam. That don't won't hunt. You gotta pay now."?
 
Is there any chance that Greer fucks up so bad that he files the Restraining Order himself in such a way that it ends up publicly on the docket and completely unredactet?
Once again, to remind all. The document is the application for a restraining order. The Utah Sheriff or Judge apparently took one look at it and said it would violate Josh’s Rights, slapping it down immediately.

Of course Greer has the potential to fuck it up. Not the least of which is it does not seem to be something that would be permissibly sealed under the SPO. “Spurious and Fanciful Legal Claims” are not actually covered. It could and would be confidential as part of the Discovery Process assuming neither party has reason to present it to the court as evidence of something? And depending on who or what, it involves the Judge May elect to enter it into the public record. That the Judge ordered that it be treated as Attorney’s Eyes Only is probably not the end of it, unless it’s a complete nothing burger.
 
I'm willing to help pay for the audio

While the transcript will be nice nothing beats the glory that is Russtard stuttering and stammering his way through the hearing.

Some things needs to be saved so that future Kiwi's can savour them too.
 
He pays to do it
He does it.
1746669346281.webp
 
Sorry, I'm stupid. Why is #1 moot, wasn't Hardin arguing both that Russ should need to pay the fees (#5) but also that there should be more fees?

Is it moot because it gets argued later?
Magistrate Judge Bennett can't rule on it since District Court Judge Barlow made the call.

Bennett said "First Sanctions Approved, work with Greer" Hardin said: "LOL, Greer refused, here's the amount."
Barlow said: "LOL, $1000" (without likely reviewing Hardin's actual amount).
Bennett is now overruled and the amount Hardin sent is moot.

There are still more possible sanctions in play.
 
Sorry, I'm stupid. Why is #1 moot, wasn't Hardin arguing both that Russ should need to pay the fees (#5) but also that there should be more fees?

Is it moot because it gets argued later?
It's moot because both Hardin and Bennet agreed that Bennet cannot overrule the Superior Judge Barlow. The $1000 Sanction came down from Barlow, regardless of what Bennet was going to do.

I suspect that Russholes end run around the process to the District Judge who took pity on the poor retard before examining all of the facts will bite Russ hard in the end.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole