💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wasn't the reason Drex did break contact with Balldo because he also fucked something up at the time? I think it was never properly explained.
One can only hope Drex learned his lesson after this time to not get involved with niggers.
Nick's bullshit story was that Drex "thought" he had lied about something. Since it's Nick, he obviously did lie about something so serious that Drex broke off contact.

And yes, he conveniently showed up right around the blackface lawyer thing. I guess Nick smooth talked him into thinking he had improved or whatever. Then, apparently, Nick lied again about something, probably his drug degeneracy, and Drex cut him off again, having figured out the worthless snake bastard Nick hadn't in fact improved.
 
This guy isn't a Twelve-Stepper, he's a No-Stepper! Not that the AA model or groups are perfect, but damn, they're better than this! Fucking A, man, drop the balldo, go to AA
But he doesn't need any of that, he is not an addict.
He had a "friend" working inside the court ordered rehab-like thing during trial who put him in the "lowest tier of addiction" and gave him "not an alcoholic" status.
(Nick admitted to this in the Viva Frei interview few days ago)

"All those filthy disgusting meth-heads in my rehab were addicts, not me I passed the rehab with ease, because I'm not an addict" - 🥃 :really:
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
What is the burden for punishment? Preponderance of evidence or something else?
A bit more than that as discipline or license revocation has a quasi-criminal element to it, but it has been described as:
"clear and convincing evidence," "full, clear, and convincing," "cogent and compelling," and "a strong and convincing showing."
(picked that source because look what it is, Nick's alma mater).

Also, the rules of evidence are relaxed compared to criminal law.

"Clear and convincing" is midway between "preponderance of evidence" and "beyond a reasonable doubt." Exactly where in the middle it is, nobody knows.
 
What a rank, stinking hypocrite this man is. The only important policy issues are the ones that impact on ME! He knew what the law was. He knew what the penalties for breaking the law were. He chose to ignore all that and break the law anyway, believing that he wouldn't get caught -- because by and large, nobody gives much of a fuck about personal use unless you force them to do so. If the police wanted to make arrests for possession, they could sit at the dealer's spot and scoop people up in their dozens, all day every day.
There was once a politician who acted this way. He arrogantly broke the law, over and over, assuming he'd get away with it. Caught and given the offer of a ridiculously lenient plea deal, he assumed he knew better than his lawyers and arrogantly chose to take the case to trial, where he was found super mega ultra guilty. Then he publicly denounced the court, the judges, the cops, everyone except himself and refused to take responsibility.

He even held a press conference while sentence was pending and things were looking terrible.

His name was R. Budd Dwyer. Nick should follow in his footsteps.
 
There was once a politician who acted this way. He arrogantly broke the law, over and over, assuming he'd get away with it. Caught and given the offer of a ridiculously lenient plea deal, he assumed he knew better than his lawyers and arrogantly chose to take the case to trial, where he was found super mega ultra guilty. Then he publicly denounced the court, the judges, the cops, everyone except himself and refused to take responsibility.

He even held a press conference while sentence was pending and things were looking terrible.

His name was R. Budd Dwyer. Nick should follow in his footsteps.

Savage!
 
Per MATI, Rekieta asked Null to delete the latest MN Public Record. April dox confirmed.
Here it is, clipped:

Josh, “a good person,” received a message from Rekieta around noon on Easter Sunday, telling him he had to delete the MN Public Records post because it was a site violation.
Josh replied: "Stop cheating on your wife."
Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."

 
Or be like Nick and add at least eight hours of super-chatting in YouTube streams to the 12 - 14 hours on Twitter.
Just a small correction to clarify how much sadder Nick is. I don't know much about "catturd" but I'd imagine he makes some amount of money to sperg out online for over 12 hours a day. Nick pays a pedophile and a few other no-name streamers to bitch about his ex-bull and joke about his cokehead 9 year old. That sounds a lot more miserable.
 
Here it is, clipped:

Josh, “a good guy,” received a message from Rekieta around noon on Easter Sunday, telling him he had to delete the MN Public Records post because it was a site violation.
Josh replied: "Stop cheating on your wife."
Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."

2025-04-25_15-57-36.mp4
"She always consented"
Did she this time?
 
Nick is amusingly well-versed in substance analysis.
Wyświetl załącznik 7276009
Nick should have asked DUIguy because his legal take is wrong. "Legal limit" does not mean you're allowed to drive intoxicated, it's just the baseline for when merely having that BAC presumptively results in a conviction. You can be proven guilty of driving intoxicated at a lower limit.

An officer experienced at determining intoxication can give testimony at trial.

You know, someone like Pomplun.

In short, the phrase "legal limit" does not mean you can just go driving around at 0.7 if you're impaired at that level.
 
Josh, “a good person,” received a message from Rekieta around noon on Easter Sunday, telling him he had to delete the MN Public Records post because it was a site violation.
What is with Nick and confirming dox :story:

"You are a good person" - Nick to Josh.
Nick is such a fucking manipulative faggot. He openly calls Null a shota pedo on his show but showers on the praise when he wants something done on his behalf.

Can you imagine being forced to deal with this on a daily basis? What a curse to be a part of the Rekieta household.
 
Here it is, clipped:

Josh, “a good person,” received a message from Rekieta around noon on Easter Sunday, telling him he had to delete the MN Public Records post because it was a site violation.
Josh replied: "Stop cheating on your wife."
Rekieta responded: "I have never cheated on my wife. She always consented."
He's completely Bitchmade. I'm sorry but his parents can't die stop the support soon enough. This caricature of the 7 deadly sins.....
@Null can Nick get his own category in the lolcow of the year award? Like speedrun any % life ruination? I'm afraid the other lolcows can't even compete with such vitriol.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole