💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Screenshot_20250425-072537_YouTube.webp
Viva's Balldo YT interview

I haven't been in the thread for about a year. Viva's interview with Nick popped up in my recommendations.

I didn't watch the actual video, but was skimming the comments (which were mostly smoothbrain balldowashers and "do not cast the first stone" hopeless types) when I came across this Balldo reply to a fairly innocuous comment about his daughter's hair follicle result.

I very painfully skimmed back about 50 pages in the thread, but couldn't find it being posted previously.

As per usual, Balldo feigns disbelief that it's the State's fault for not pursuing and repeating his daughter's positive coke test, so that we will always be left uncertain what truly happened.

Because he is at the front of the line with concern, wanting to clear his name and get to the real truth of the matter.

He, of course, also has the rock solid alibi that a true "drug addict" would never waste any coke on his children.

Edit: Came across a few more, one that was previously posted about the cops/prosecution never asking about his dealer.

Screenshot_20250425-074849_YouTube.webp
Screenshot_20250425-074218_YouTube.webp
Screenshot_20250425-074155_YouTube.webp
Screenshot_20250425-073931_YouTube.webp
Screenshot_20250425-074045_YouTube.webp
Screenshot_20250425-074108_YouTube.webp
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Grown men having long-term animosity toward other men for anything other than direct harm done to their family is gay as fuck. Any man I've ever known who holds a grudge has been a huge faggot. You don't have to be best buds with someone who did you wrong, but you do have to stop fucking talking about them.
 
He, of course, also has the rock solid alibi that a true "drug addict" would never waste any coke on his children.
As opposed to the people who never take drugs who go out, buy an 8ball and feed it to their kids for lunch.
Nick is so delusional that he does not even realize how retarded what he says sounds to a normal person.

The ONLY people who have loose drugs lying about their house are people who consume those drugs. They are called addicts.

I hope his PO keeps track of all his bullshit lying.
 
People just keep trolling Nick and he bites, every, single, time.
Wyświetl załącznik 7274977
(Archive)

When pitched the idea of being a "sober influencer" nick is appalled. Typical non-addict behavior.
Wyświetl załącznik 7274989
(Archive)


PS. Ghostarchive works again for archiving Twitter.

His self-deprecating humor about cocaine and his arrest would be amusing and possibly even endearing if he didn’t have 5 children taken away from him, one of which tested way hot for cocaine metabolites in their hair.

The consequences of your immorality are always amplified when you have children. You can’t joke about it in good taste.
 
Grown men having long-term animosity toward other men for anything other than direct harm done to their family is gay as fuck. Any man I've ever known who holds a grudge has been a huge faggot. You don't have to be best buds with someone who did you wrong, but you do have to stop fucking talking about them.
I think he was just starved for male comradery at that point. Then he found a local man that:
A) liked what he liked
B) liked to party
C) liked to share his toys
D) he found attractive

It was a deeply closeted homosexual relationship, and they expressed it by fuck each other's wives. Nick was obviously the submissive bottom in this exchange and thus the bigger faggot, but Aaron is just as guilty.

It started off as this bullshit always does; sharing drugs and sharing sexual partners, but these fags caught feelings for each other.
If it weren't for those dang pesky keeds, this would just be a very messy, and embarrassing, public break up.

TL:DR Nick has never been dumped before, this is how he's handling it. Like a BPD woman.
 
Nick can go fuck himself with a rake with this "drug policy is dumb" stance.

By his own admission and the statements of people like Aaron and Coomerlot, he has spent likely tens of thousands of dollars funding that illegal drug market of Minnesota.

That is drug producers threatening innocent people into harvesting, baking and cutting cocaine. That is the death of many covertly smuggling drugs over borders, and promoting the production of a substances that ruin lives.

I fucking hate his faggot libertarian horse cock about "Woah, nerds, chill out! All I did was take drugs, man".

He is the end user of a relentless, bloody production line. I hope someone calls him out on that on-stream soon.

"Well if we produced cocaine legally, I could buy it from a farm right here in Minnesota" :really:

And you can microdose your daughter without CPS oversight as well, fucking weasel.
 
A source within the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility informs me that they are investigating Rekieta, but that they cannot reveal more
What is the burden for punishment? Preponderance of evidence or something else?
 
Wyświetl załącznik 7275199
Viva's Balldo YT interview

I haven't been in the thread for about a year. Viva's interview with Nick popped up in my recommendations.

I didn't watch the actual video, but was skimming the comments (which were mostly smoothbrain balldowashers and "do not cast the first stone" hopeless types) when I came across this Balldo reply to a fairly innocuous comment about his daughter's hair follicle result.

I very painfully skimmed back about 50 pages in the thread, but couldn't find it being posted previously.

As per usual, Balldo feigns disbelief that it's the State's fault for not pursuing and repeating his daughter's positive coke test, so that we will always be left uncertain what truly happened.

Because he is at the front of the line with concern, wanting to clear his name and get to the real truth of the matter.

He, of course, also has the rock solid alibi that a true "drug addict" would never waste any coke on his children.

Edit: Came across a few more, one that was previously posted about the cops/prosecution never asking about his dealer.

Wyświetl załącznik 7275274
Wyświetl załącznik 7275275
Wyświetl załącznik 7275277
Wyświetl załącznik 7275281
Wyświetl załącznik 7275282
Wyświetl załącznik 7275284
Excellent digging. I love this comment...
1745584335951.webp
... because it's from someone who should be an ally (a Viva follower), a lawyer, and it's 100% accurate. It could be a comment ITT, but he's just watching from the stands.
 
What is the burden for punishment? Preponderance of evidence or something else?
"full, clear and convincing evidence" - In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ray 452 N.W.2d 689 (1990) Minnesota Supreme Court. Also: "The Director bears the burden of proving professional misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. Clear and convincing proof, of course, is a higher standard than preponderance of the evidence." IN RE CHARGES OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, 924 NW 2d 266 - Minn: Supreme Court 2019

Also something interesting:

"The purposes of disciplinary sanctions are to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys", "We consider four factors in determining the appropriate discipline to impose: (1) the nature of the misconduct; (2) the cumulative weight of the disciplinary violations; (3) the harm to the public; and (4) the harm to the legal profession. We also consider any aggravating and mitigating factors and look to similar cases to ensure that our discipline is consistent with prior sanctions", "In addition to the four factors discussed above, in determining the appropriate discipline we also consider whether any aggravating or mitigating circumstances are present. The attorney subject to discipline bears the burden to allege and prove mitigating factors." - IN RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST ODEGAARD, 15 NW 2d 632 - Minn: Supreme Court 2025
 
Excellent digging. I love this comment...
Wyświetl załącznik 7275376
... because it's from someone who should be an ally (a Viva follower), a lawyer, and it's 100% accurate. It could be a comment ITT, but he's just watching from the stands.
He used "could care less" instead of "couldn't care less".

As a lawyer of 30 years he should know better.

It drives me insane and yes I'm a petty bitch.
 
I believe we will see a move, eventually if the social outlook does not improve. Before, Kayla was too tied to her family, but if there is stress there, Nick might convince her to make the jump.
Nick would love to isolate the family even more than his actions already have. Pray for those kids.

Wasn't the reason Drex did break contact with Balldo because he also fucked something up at the time? I think it was never properly explained.
One can only hope Drex learned his lesson after this time to not get involved with niggers.
My recollection of the lore was Nick move to BFN (ie Spicer) and didn't bother to maintain the friendship. Drex was still in his mom's basement in the Twin Cities. Which, that happens a lot after college. Moving, kids, work, etc. It's true though, Nick reached out to Drex to use as a shield when his black face photo resurfaced.

A source within the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility informs me that they are investigating Rekieta, but that they cannot reveal more
I hope they interview Aaron. I also hope they consider Nick's statements these days, especially while seemingly still representing himself as a lawyer on YouTube.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole