WEEKEND
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 23 Gru 2023
The relationship between Nick and the guests to his show was mutually beneficial. He never gave any of them any monetary compensation for their commentary and time. He in fact made a lot of money acting as a go between and glorified TTS for his audience to interact with the guests. They, on the other hand got exposure to a very large audience which would be a massive shot in the arm for many of their streaming careers.
The question is, do they owe Nick any loyalty? I don't think so. This type of friendship/business partnership is conditional. Put simply the moment the money stopped flowing, the guests stopped coming. That might seem like a mercery attitude but remember that this was just an e-friendship. Moreover, the loyalty Nick wants from his former friends would've damaged their own streaming business as the now hostile audience lash out at the dumb takes from the fools still trying to defend Nick.
Now why did the money stop flowing? It's pretty well documented at this point but fundamentally Nick stopped being a lawtuber. Even before the confirmation and exposure of all the degeneracy going on in the Rekieta house we still saw Nick get blackout drunk every night. He was a belligerent asshole and often incoherent. Some people chose to call Nick out and eventually alog him but most simply moved on to the other lawtubers.
Nick just has a bad attitude. He expects everyone from friends he's never met, to his retarded family and the suffering audience to clean up for him and ignore the fact that he hasn't learned a thing. He's convinced he can lie his way out of everything even when the evidence is plain for all to see. He's ego simply can't let him ever accept that it was his fault. Even now he twisted and contorts himself to try and blame everyone but him. He's like a spoiled child.
I said once in this thread that I take no ownership of this shit show. I don't want to save or condemn any of the retards involved and I don't really care what happens to them. It's up to Nick and Kayla to sort this out but I know it'll never happen. Kayla is a useless whore and Nick is honestly just a bad person. Not evil or anything like that, just a immature bitch.
The question is, do they owe Nick any loyalty? I don't think so. This type of friendship/business partnership is conditional. Put simply the moment the money stopped flowing, the guests stopped coming. That might seem like a mercery attitude but remember that this was just an e-friendship. Moreover, the loyalty Nick wants from his former friends would've damaged their own streaming business as the now hostile audience lash out at the dumb takes from the fools still trying to defend Nick.
Now why did the money stop flowing? It's pretty well documented at this point but fundamentally Nick stopped being a lawtuber. Even before the confirmation and exposure of all the degeneracy going on in the Rekieta house we still saw Nick get blackout drunk every night. He was a belligerent asshole and often incoherent. Some people chose to call Nick out and eventually alog him but most simply moved on to the other lawtubers.
Nick just has a bad attitude. He expects everyone from friends he's never met, to his retarded family and the suffering audience to clean up for him and ignore the fact that he hasn't learned a thing. He's convinced he can lie his way out of everything even when the evidence is plain for all to see. He's ego simply can't let him ever accept that it was his fault. Even now he twisted and contorts himself to try and blame everyone but him. He's like a spoiled child.
I said once in this thread that I take no ownership of this shit show. I don't want to save or condemn any of the retards involved and I don't really care what happens to them. It's up to Nick and Kayla to sort this out but I know it'll never happen. Kayla is a useless whore and Nick is honestly just a bad person. Not evil or anything like that, just a immature bitch.
