💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[suspended animation]

Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may.

I wonder how inappropriate this behavior towards a little girl was, on a scale of 1 to Melton.

Just kidding! He doesn't give a shit about kids, unless he can use them as an excuse or as deflection.

 

[Kheapathic]

Now Nick is claiming that one of his kids claimed their foster family (probably nick's parents/siblings/inlaws) "made them uncomfortable", while clearly nudging the audience to believe they were sexually assaulted or exposed to hard drug use.

I'm guessing Nick never had much of a childhood. While it's been a good while, I understand why kids may be apprehensive about staying at other places and not others. You have a sleep-over with a friend, hell yeah, you're with a friend, maybe pizza and videogames or whatever you like are involved, hell yeah this is awesome. Compared to being ripped from your home that you're familiar with and being told, you're gonna sleep/stay in this new place; maybe you're familiar with them, maybe you're not, but it's against your will, and it's not gonna be pizza, and videogames, and cool shit like it would be when staying at a friend's house. It also doesn't help that you watched your parents get led away by police, and the police also undoubtedly supervised and put you through weird tests for some reason; even if you don't understand all what's going on, you know shit isn't right, and now you're at a different house with different people, and for some reason, the adults are saying their parents love them and hope you'll be back with your parents and at your house in a short amount of time.

Now tell me why a kid may be uncomfortable, and why it's specifically the fault of the people they're staying with and not related to the events that landed them there.

 

[Arschersetzer]

Wyświetl załącznik 7249398

"It is fun to watch his skill and creativity come out in his dishes"
-Quayla Rekieta (ghostwritten by Nick) 2025

 

[Delany's Donkey]

I wonder how inappropriate this behavior towards a little girl was, on a scale of 1 to Melton.

Just kidding! He doesn't give a shit about kids, unless he can use them as an excuse or as deflection.

In nicks fucked up mind the "inappropriate behavior" was probably They saw the 9 year old eating cocaine like it's a pixy-stix and tried to stop her.

 

[dustnight]

So can anyone tell me what Aaron has supposedly "lied about" and what we've "gotten wrong" now that nick has admitted to literally everything everyone has been saying for 2+ year?

Aaron ate my gooooOOOOooOOooo

In nicks fucked up mind the the "inappropriate behavior" was probably They probably saw the 9 year old eating cocaine like it's a pixy-stix and tried to stop her.

hE pOPpeD mY bAbY gIrl oN tHe hEaD wHEn shE wAS snoRtiN hEr coCaiNE!!!!! What kind of a monster does that to a child?!! Wouldn't even give back to her, but I showed him the ole one two and he folded like a plum at dennys!

 

[August Levasseur]

"The guardian ad litem did not like the fact that one of the children was reporting inappropriate behavior by someone who was around and associated with the county. Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may. When my child reported that, the guardian ad litem said my child was lying and threatened to remove all of our children to out of a family foster care."

Wayment.
The children were being fostered by family members.
One of the kids reports inappropriate behaviour *wink* *wink*
The GAL says if they wanna take this seriously he'll have to remove the kids to an out of family foster care.
They choose not to take it seriously and ignore it

What's the point of disclosing this? To make the state look bad, but its one of Rackets' own family members that's being accused here. Removing the kids to an out of family foster care would be the only reasonable response if you wanted to take a report like that as the truth.

 

[Pentamidine]

It absolutely was retarded, as anyone who ever read and dealt with a warrant/Franks argument said at the time. But Nick can't admit it was retarded. Even if he did, it would be couched as him saying that you have to do everything possible in legal proceedings even if they have a low chance of success. Or that they were good arguments but his counsel was bad. We'll never hear Nick say "yeah, my Fourth Amendment rights weren't actually violated and the warrant was completely good." Part of his cope is that he doesn't have to take responsibility for the crime if he can contest the basis for the search and seizure.

Of course, Nick is totally free to prove me wrong and admit that he was flailing at the time. But I think everyone knows that will never happen.

It's better than that - he'll say the Franks argument was sound and would have won but his lawyer sucks and fucked it up. He's alluded to this multiple times already. Which is funny since his lawyer was a hand-picked Barnes walker

 

[Captain Manning]

SCHOOL ANTI DRUG PROGRAMS UNDER THE CAPTAIN MANNING ADMINISTRATION:


Okay class, today we're gonna learn about drugs.


Awwwwwww!


I know, I know. But the school board says there is a very important video you all need to watch. Now please look at the screen.


Anime sucks... cope... and sneed says...

Now, do you little shits understand why you should say no to drugs? You'll end up like Nick Rekieta here, reading the same superchat 11 times about a farting dragon in a car eating pizza!


We get it! We get it! We'll never do drugs! Turn it off! PLEASE MAKE IT STOP!

---

Parents, can I count on your vote?

 

[Melty Butter]

Just to put a point on this, whether he was referring to a County employee or Dan Sletta (who is broadly a county employee, having fostered numerous kids) ...

- Nick claims that one of his children reported behaviour on the part of someone connected to the county' government that made them 'uncomfortable' and would infuriate people if they knew what it was. The GAL in their got mad at that and threatened to have all the children taken from family foster care if they did not stop.

It wasn't clear. Could have been aimed at a government worker.

"The guardian ad litem did not like the fact that one of the children was reporting inappropriate behavior by someone who was around and associated with the county. Inappropriate behavior that made one of my children uncomfortable, in ways that would infuriate people if I disclosed the details—and at some point, I may. When my child reported that, the guardian ad litem said my child was lying and threatened to remove all of our children to out of a family foster care."

Nick said his daughter told them something that made them uncomfortable at the in-laws house. The GAL offered to move the children to a different foster home. But they couldn't go back with Nick and Kayla. The GAL would have reported any malfeasance to police and would never have said his daughter was lying.

... ANY allegations of this sort to anyone are inflammatory and possibly defamatory. Pics/statements/proof or it didn't happen.

One possibility: If CPS was doing their job (this is easily googled), protocol generally dictates that CPS may have inspected their bodies to ensure no harm was done because drug possession with kids in the house is highly correlated with harm to children. If this report from the child/ren occurred AFTER the positive drug result (likely), they would have every reason to do this.

(In some states, this can involve inspection of intimate areas, but that is unlikely in this case because there was nothing to indicate that kind of abuse.)

Would a basic body inspection by a stranger make any child feel uncomfortable? Of course it would.

IF that's what he's talking about, Nick brought this situation on himself. As for Dan Sletta, I feel like the context of Nick's words highly implicates him. I could be wrong.

Regardless, choose your words carefully, Rekieta. Holy shit.

 

[Not Really Here]

Wyświetl załącznik 7249398

Where's the pepper? And the eggs?

 

[ChromaQuack]

if you want to know the truth about it.

Bish.

SCHOOL ANTI DRUG PROGRAMS UNDER THE CAPTAIN MANNING ADMINISTRATION:

One counterpoint: how do we get to use Nick's likeness without giving him infinite gooberment money? to use the cokestream in all classrooms across America would mean making this man rich beyond measure and that doesn't sit right with me.

 

[Grayback]

Kurt streamed from Denny's - LMAO!

I know that Kurt has struggled with loneliness and with trying to make himself more attractive.
Bold Kurt, going-in-for-the-kill Kurt, doesn't-give-a-shit Kurt, "fuck you I know I'm right" Kurt, Kurt with balls, is definitely the most-attractive version of Kurt. (The beard is an improvement, too.)

The age of "occasional podcast sidekick" Kurt is over. The age of "being his own man" Kurt has begun.

They can detect Galaxy Gas use through a vitamin B12 deficiency in blood tests.

Like everything causes a B12 deficiency though, it's hardly conclusive.

That's not specific enough for use as a drug test.

I get that you couldn't declare a parole violation just from Nick having a B12 deficiency—but if the deficiency is severe enough, I wonder if it could be used as grounds for his PO to demand extra surveillance of Nick.
Like if his B12 levels are in the gutter for weeks in a row, then the PO (or an underling) is going to literally just sit with Nick all day like a goddamned shadow to see what he's doing during the day, watching him like he's an elementary schooler with a behavioral problem.

 

[PixarsTedKennedy]

Don't worry, that one was on locals. There's another one in a couple hours on YouTube for everyone

Aren't his youtube streams unmodded? This should be good.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Bish.

One counterpoint: how do we get to use Nick's likeness without giving him infinite gooberment money? to use the cokestream in all classrooms across America would mean making this man rich beyond measure and that doesn't sit right with me.

Transformative and educational is fair use.

 

[Ivan Daniloff]

Regardless, choose your words carefully, Rekieta. Holy shit.

I assume a county agency can’t sue a private citizen for defamation but like…is there any path of relief available? (And yes I feel WEIRD and FUNNY being outraged on the government’s behalf. Thanks, Nose. Fucking piece of shit.)

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I assume a county agency can’t sue a private citizen for defamation but like…is there any path of relief available? (And yes I feel WEIRD and FUNNY being outraged on the government’s behalf. Thanks, Nose. Fucking piece of shit.)

Releasing the bodycam footage and CHIPS file would be conclusive.

 

[Sir Baz the Intolerant]

Nick's LOCALS show highlights

While I'm very much stating the obvious here, looking over Rackets' coping just makes it even more obvious that he's going to breach his conditions and land himself into even more trouble. He's not just an addict, he's an addict that's both inherently anti-social and now permanently brain damaged from substance abuse. He has neither the humility nor the cognitive ability to acknowledge his mistakes, I mean fuck he wasn't even capable of being pragmatic and saying 'sorry I'll be better' with his pinky crossed behind his back in court.

He'll chafe under the conditions imposed on him until the ever unwavering self belief of his own brilliance will convince him that he can somehow outsmart his probation officer, just as it convinced him that he could outsmart the court. This pattern will continue, as will his spiral into even further degeneracy, until he either fucks up so seriously that he gets some big boy time, or his vices/poor life choices get him killed.

I've known my fair share of druggies, and of the ones that ended up behind bars or dead, all of them were smarter and more capable than Nick, so make of that what you will.

 

[PixarsTedKennedy]

The chat is twisting religion:

Gotta niggas ribs hurtin today!

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

In other words Nick, who was not trying to act like a cult leader, was having Aaron handwrite cultish self-criticism letters which Aaron agreed to because he's that much of a cuckold.

Not really beating the cult allegations there, Rekieta.

I believe this was a letter that Aaron wrote and addressed to April (I think he has talked about it before on STMS) in an attempt (Aaron claims) to win her back.

If true, Nick is really not beating those cult-leader allegations. This is something Scientology and Children of God did--get blackmail material on all its members.

Nick's streams OUGHT to be used as anti-drug PSAs.

Nick had previously argued that school anti-drug programs made drugs sound cool. And to be fair (since I am roughly the same age), I wouldn't say they made sound drugs sound cool, but they were kinda lame. Really limp wristed. We had Nancy Reagan telling us to "Just say No," and that's pretty weak.

You need to scare the SHIT out of kids. You could play Requiem for a Dream in the classroom, or Nick's Cokestream. Yeah, with the latter they'd have to endure "Anime sucks cope and sneed," but that would probably get less parental complaints than "ass to ass" I figure.

Except in the stream he made it clear he has some bizarre drug version of the NAP where it should be legal--until you hurt someone, then you get charged.

Hi Drex.

I actually think that he meant Qalya and April.

How many manchild-hours have already been spent debating the metabolites here? I'm sure he will bring something compelling and new to the table

A Quora article. You are telling me that is not convincing to you? Maybe he can find a Wiki too!

I'm guessing Nick never had much of a childhood. While it's been a good while, I understand why kids may be apprehensive about staying at other places and not others. You have a sleep-over with a friend, hell yeah, you're with a friend, maybe pizza and videogames or whatever you like are involved, hell yeah this is awesome. Compared to being ripped from your home that you're familiar with and being told, you're gonna sleep/stay in this new place; maybe you're familiar with them, maybe you're not, but it's against your will, and it's not gonna be pizza, and videogames, and cool shit like it would be when staying at a friend's house. It also doesn't help that you watched your parents get led away by police, and the police also undoubtedly supervised and put you through weird tests for some reason; even if you don't understand all what's going on, you know shit isn't right, and now you're at a different house with different people, and for some reason, the adults are saying their parents love them and hope you'll be back with your parents and at your house in a short amount of time.

Now tell me why a kid may be uncomfortable, and why it's specifically the fault of the people they're staying with and not related to the events that landed them there.

Wayment.
The children were being fostered by family members.
One of the kids reports inappropriate behaviour *wink* *wink*
The GAL says if they wanna take this seriously he'll have to remove the kids to an out of family foster care.
They choose not to take it seriously and ignore it

What's the point of disclosing this? To make the state look bad, but its one of Rackets' own family members that's being accused here. Removing the kids to an out of family foster care would be the only reasonable response if you wanted to take a report like that as the truth.

They were at their material grandparents' house.

If Nick tried to use the state to shut up his in-laws when the children reported them being critical of Nick (as it sounds to be) he is a a bigger cuck than I thought.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

It's almost like that bullshit was total moron shit and he completely lost on it because it was retarded.

Remember how that Boss Baby looking bitch ass fucking whore Barnes insisted it was totally the best argument of all time and how anyone who was pointing out how completely fucking retarded it was was wrong?

What are you talking about? Nick totally won his case on everything using these rock-solid constitutional arguments. He argued the search and arrest violated his 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 14th and 25th amendment rights. His victory was unprecedented in scope when he won his Frank's hearing at BOTH the trial and appellate levels (the first ever to win at trial court, appeal and win again). His precedent setting watermark arguments were so devastating, the prosecution was left speechless. And total victory when he successfully negotiated a felony guilty plea for 5 years probation. Never bet against Barnes. Name another person that didn't sell drugs, only used drugs in their home, didn't have drugs on their person nor was under the influence when stopped and got off with only a felony conviction. You can't.

Barnes is THAT good.