Trump administration contends it has no duty to return illegally deported man to US - The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return.

1744636599626.webp
A member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus holds a picture of Kilmar Abrego Garcia during a news conference last week. | Alex Wong/Getty Images


The Trump administration insisted Sunday that it has no legal obligation to arrange for the return of a Maryland man illegally deported from the United States, arguing that a Supreme Court ruling last week only requires officials to admit him into the country if he makes it back from a high-security prison in El Salvador.

Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge that they don’t interpret the Supreme Court’s Thursday ruling — that the administration “facilitate” Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s release — as obligating the administration to do anything more than adjust his immigration status to admit him if El Salvador’s government chooses to release him.

With El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele set to meet President Donald Trump Monday, DOJ attorneys argued the courts have no power to require the administration to engage with the Salvadoran government to reach a diplomatic solution. They contend such a potential order would amount to a violation of the separation of powers and an intrusion into what they allege is unfettered presidential power to conduct foreign relations.

“All of those requested orders involve interactions with a foreign sovereign — and potential violations of that sovereignty,” Justice Department attorneys wrote in a seven-page submission to U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis. “[A] federal court cannot compel the Executive Branch to engage in any mandated act of diplomacy or incursion upon the sovereignty of another nation.”

The administration’s position suggests officials do not view the Supreme Court’s order as compelling them to seek Abrego Garcia’s return. The Salvadoran native entered the country illegally around 2011 and had been living in Maryland. The Trump administration has admitted it deported him to El Salvador in violation of a 2019 immigration court order barring his deportation to that country. Though Abrego Garcia was denied asylum, a judge found he could not be sent to his home country because of a legitimate fear of persecution by a local gang.

The administration continued Sunday to flout a Friday order from Xinis to deliver “daily updates” to the court describing its efforts to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. Sunday’s update from Evan Katz, the assistant director of removal operations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the administration had “no updates” for the judge. A day earlier, in a similarly threadbare update, the administration turned to Michael Kozak, the State Department’s senior bureau official in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, who said Abrego Garcia was still alive in El Salvador’s CECOT prison.

The administration is also bucking demands from Abrego Garcia’s attorneys that officials detail the arrangement to ship hundreds of foreign nationals to a notorious prison in El Salvador. One of the Sunday filings insists those details are classified and could be subject to attorney-client and state secrets privileges.

“It would be inappropriate for this Court to hastily order production of these sensitive documents,” Justice Department lawyer Drew Ensign wrote.

The administration also said it would resist efforts by Xinis to demand testimony from officials about their thinking on Abrego Garcia’s potential return, saying such disclosures “could interfere with ongoing diplomatic discussions — particularly in the context of President Bukele’s ongoing trip to the United States.”

Still, the administration’s narrow view of its obligations under the Supreme Court’s ruling appears to up the stakes of a hearing Xinis has scheduled for Tuesday afternoon to assess the steps officials are taking to arrange for Abrego Garcia’s return.


Source:
 
The entire "deport him anywhere, just not back to El Salvador" ruling is WTF.

Doesn't qualify for asylum, yet can't be sent back. Not because of persecution by state actors or anything, mind you. But "gangs".

Who the fuck would ever take him.

The whole thing sounds like a deliberate scheme to keep illegals from being kicked out without openly admitting to it. Order them deported, but forbid deporting them to the only place that'd ever accept them, so they get to stay indefinitely.
 
All of that and and you still skipped the part where he had a several year ,standing stay order against Deportation and then you skipped the second , NEW , stay order. That's due process bro. It's always telling how people hate the law when it doesn't give them the results they want expose themselves.

When the law gives you what you want, IT WORKS
When the law doesn't give you what you want, IT DOESN'T"T WORK
When someone violates the law and you like that person, THE LAW IS AGAINST THEM
When someone violates the law and you hate that person, THE LAW IS JUST

This is America bro and The Law of America said, he stays.
Faggots and Russian Bots breaking the very laws that make the America strong, say he doesn't.
This guy, supposedly running from gang violence, jumped over 11 countries from El Salvador to the US (damn imagine how scared he was to jump over 11 entire countries! That must have been the sole reason), came into the country illegally and did NOT request asylum until he was caught several years in, and then demanded he not be sent back to the only country he is a citizen off because he fears gang retaliation (despite not being a gang member himself of course).

Man what the fuck is this, I've seen kids caught with their hand in the cookie jar come up with better excuses.
 
You don't care about illegality because you're defending an illegal immigrant who broke the law to come here and a member of MS-13.

Its authoritarian to remove illegal immigrant gang banger back their own country? And since when did leftists, like you, care about authoritarianism when you tried to lock up Kyle Rittenhouse for actually following the law, tried passing illegal student loan forgiveness, or shutting down businesses with illegal COVID mandates? You're the pot calling the kettle black.
I called you a faggot, don't conflate me with leftist ideals.
 
If you want to be happy in life, find yourself a woman who will fight for you like leftists will fight for people who prostitute children, threaten to kill pregnant women and enjoy an afternoon of skinning faces and attaching them to footballs.
 
These people literally have no fucking clue how violent MS13 and TDA actually are, because they've never had to experience it.
 
It's funny how many Kiwi Farmers here want to see Americans raped and murdered just to stick it to Trump.
 
This guy, supposedly running from gang violence, jumped over 11 countries from El Salvador to the US (damn imagine how scared he was to jump over 11 entire countries! That must have been the sole reason), came into the country illegally and did NOT request asylum until he was caught several years in, and then demanded he not be sent back to the only country he is a citizen off because he fears gang retaliation (despite not being a gang member himself of course).

Man what the fuck is this, I've seen kids caught with their hand in the cookie jar come up with better excuses.
Also, El Salvador has started cleaning up their act over the last few years in regard to gangs and gang violence (as hinted by the massive superdupermax prisons). The gangs in 2019 aren't the same in 2025.
 
I'd care about the law, if we haven't had 30+ years of ignoring immigration and the border. You don't get to claim foul when someone goes through the process via their vested powers. Someone gets sent back and you scream some rule or whatever is being broken. 30+ fucking years of this shit, and you suddenly care about the rules? Hmm, very interesting, face the fucking wall you snake.
 
Also, El Salvador has started cleaning up their act over the last few years in regard to gangs and gang violence (as hinted by the massive superdupermax prisons). The gangs in 2019 aren't the same in 2025.

El Salvador before Bukele was a total shithole, prior presidents had tried negotiating with gangs instead of fixing the problem. Bukele, like Trump, had to fight both parties to get anything done in the country, including fighting the Salvadoran court system. All you need to do to fix these sorts of issues is punish criminals. Who would've thought?
 
Too many people even on this site who worships the anarcho tyranny where criminals are free to be criminals, and get special protection against prosecution, and where revoking that privilige is treated as heresy. How come judge asshole is the only one who gets to ignore the law?
Give me one good reason why we should respect the decision of a rogue judge that give immunity from the law to criminals
 
It is indeed problematic. The Court should just rule correctly to avoid the problem and then noncompliance would no longer be the just outcome.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole