US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
This reminds of when Hoppe criticized Milei for not doing “libertarian” thing enough.

Ron Paul was always right in his analysis, but wouldn’t know how to approach making a dent in the Fed.
It's a cult that only works because it's built on metaphysical sand. I've had a few page debates about it on my autism containment thread. So I'm not going to sperg about it here. They aren't wrong about everything, but they aren't right about everything either. Hoppe in particular is contradictory in his metaphysics.
 
Ron Paul Against Tariffs

Wyświetl załącznik 7191815
Trump stated many times on the campaign trail that he would be raising Tariffs.


For all the faggots sucking dick in this thread acting like Trump has bent the knee and Nick Fuentes totally isn't gay guys, seriously, their #1 idol is now being an old faggot along with basically every old person BUT Trump.

We can finally throw lolbertarians into a Minecraft building modeled after the fed and make them work in their wagey cubicles for the rest of their Minecraft lives, no amount of trying to grow a beard will save them.
 
Ron Paul Against Tariffs

Wyświetl załącznik 7191815
Trump stated many times on the campaign trail that he would be raising Tariffs.

To go back even further on Ron Paul and Donald Trump's views on trade:
Trump echoing protectionist and "fair share" sentiments in the late 1980s:

Compare that with an excerpt from Ron Paul's “The Case for Free Trade“ essay from 1981:
Although we think of ourselves as a free-trading nation, it takes more than 700 pages just to list all the tariffs on imported goods, and another 400 to inventory all the non-tariff restraints, such as quotas and “orderly marketing agreements.”

A tariff is a tax levied on a foreign good, to help a special interest at the expense of American consumers.

A trade restraint or marketing agreement—on the number of inexpensive Taiwanese sneakers that Americans can buy, for example—achieves the same goal, at the same cost, in a less forthright manner.

And all the trends are towards more subsidies for U.S. exporters, and more prohibitions and taxes on imports.

Trade is to be subsidized or restrained, not left to the voluntary actions of consumers and producers.

In 1930, Congress passed the Smoot-Hawley tariff bill, imposing heavy tariffs on imports, with the avowed motive of “protecting” U.S. companies and jobs. Within one year, our 25 major trading partners had retaliated with their own tariffs on American goods. World trade declined sharply, and the depression was made world-wide and longer-lasting.

Today the policy of protectionism is again gaining favor in Congress, and in other countries. But it must be fought with all our strength.

Not only does protectionism make everyone poorer—except certain special interests—but it also increases international tensions, and can lead to war.

“If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it,” wrote Adam Smith in 1776, “better buy it of them with some part of the pro duce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage. The general industry of the country will not therefore be diminished... but only left to find out the way in which it can be employed to the greater advantage.”

An important economic principle is called the division of labor. It states that economic efficiency, and therefore growth, is enhanced by everyone doing what he does best.

If I had to grow my own food, make my own clothes, build my own house, and teach my own children, our family’s living standard would plummet to a subsistence, or below-subsistence, level.
 
For all the faggots sucking dick in this thread acting like Trump has bent the knee and Nick Fuentes totally isn't gay guys, seriously, their #1 idol is now being an old faggot along with basically every old person BUT Trump.

We can finally throw lolbertarians into a Minecraft building modeled after the fed and make them work in their wagey cubicles for the rest of their Minecraft lives, no amount of trying to grow a beard will save them.
libertarians and libertarian policies are as much responsible for the shitty state of the world as liberals are.
 
The Paul brothers (lel) cannot fathom the idea of using ulterior strategies. Which is why they never have been president. They're the right wing Bernie Sanders.
Which is what is so funny about all of this. Trump has been rather public about doing this and why. It’s why even CNN are now having to slowly tell their viewers ‘this was a stratergy to get people to negoiate deals fast and it is working’
 
Lolbertarians worshiping the """"free market"""" at the expense of the American worker?
Wyświetl załącznik 7191952
I don't always agree with this, which American worker? The one making 20/hr in IT or coding or something with a certification they grinded for and no colleg/denbt, or the one making 40/hr with a mindless union job where they get high and move identical items for 8hr, or the one making 12/hr in food service with a degree in interpretive buttcare and 750,000 in student loan denbt? These people each benefit from very, very different economic conditions.
 
Would you feel safe in your car if you knew it was built by niggers?
I'd feel safer there than in a car made by jeets

Ron Paul Against Tariffs

Wyświetl załącznik 7191815
Trump stated many times on the campaign trail that he would be raising Tariffs.
Are people finally gonna stop worshipping this lolbert fossil just because he said the government was bad 20 years ago?
 
I don't always agree with this, which American worker? The one making 20/hr in IT or coding or something with a certification they grinded for and no colleg/denbt, or the one making 40/hr with a mindless union job where they get high and move identical items for 8hr, or the one making 12/hr in food service with a degree in interpretive buttcare and 750,000 in student loan denbt? These people each benefit from very, very different economic conditions.
I want people who work hard, and are competent to have a better life than people who do a bunch of stupid shit. I also want to make "doing the right thing" easier, and "doing the wrong thing" harder. What we have now is that it is nearly impossible for people to do the right thing, and still have a decent life. You can work 30 hrs a week and go to night school, but you won't be able to meet a woman. What if you live in bumfuck, with absentee parents, and under-aged siblings that need care? Are you going to abandon them so you can go to the better school?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole