The issue for Karl is that he forgot to actually prove that Billy caused the suicide.
A lot of people will know it to be likely true, but without proof to back up that claim its a retarded statement to make publicly without any "In my opinion" caveats.
And that is the only thing the judge is ruling on, because if Billy cheated in an arcade computer game is pretty much irrelevant for the "he caused a suicide" accusation.
No idea who thought up that retarded defense, if it was his counsel they should find another field of work.
I still cannot believe the judge actually ruled like this still, fucking boomer did not understand a single thing that happened in this case on the tech side.
Billy sues a sick guy without a job, destroys his income, guy commits suicide. Making the inference that the lawsuit might have caused that suicide should be protected speech. This is idiotic.