Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I'm just assuming russell put $2,000 in to offset the sanctions already incurred against him, so that now null would have to pay him a grand (instead of the ~grand Russel currently owes). Yet another, "Nuh uh, you!" logic. Yes I realize the sanction would be against Hardin, but Russell only sees things in how it impacts him.

 

[reactionary]

E: Oh, he also put the Keffals article in the exhibits.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Once again, Russ argues his whole family should be put in witness protection from the kiwifarms mafia!

They should, but to keep them safe from Russ himself. You never know when a Russ will spring out of the dark web, demanding they be witnesses again.

(No seriously he seems to think he can still do this, with the only penalty being that witness stipulation he made with Hardin goes away.)

 

[obsdj]

Wyświetl załącznik 7147495

Literally anyone who receives "death threats" should immediately contact the authorities in their local jurisdiction and get the names and badge numbers of whoever takes the report, as well as a copy of said report. In the United States of America, in the 21st century, anyone who claims* to have received "death threats" but declines to involve the authorities and makes excuses for not having done so can be safely assumed to be lying.

*I am referring to people who make repeated claims of such on the internet, at great length and high volume. People with genuine and legitimate fears in real life such as those with abusive spouses, who do NOT make a living trying to get attention and sympathy online, may be granted the benefit of the doubt or at least understanding when expressing reluctance to go to the cops, though they should still avail themselves of legal resources.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Literally anyone who receives "death threats" should immediately contact the authorities in their local jurisdiction and get the names and badge numbers of whoever takes the report, as well as a copy of said report. In the United States of America, in the 21st century, anyone who claims* to have received "death threats" but declines to involve the authorities and makes excuses for not having done so can be safely assumed to be lying.

*I am referring to people who make repeated claims of such on the internet, at great length and high volume. People with genuine and legitimate fears in real life such as those with abusive spouses, who do NOT make a living trying to get attention and sympathy online, may be granted the benefit of the doubt or at least understanding when expressing reluctance to go to the cops, though they should still avail themselves of legal resources.

Friendly reminder, that Russ has made only a single police report regarding harassment and it was done before KF ever made a thread on him. In that police report he blamed the News, (what appears to be) Taylor Swift, Reddit, and (what appears to be) Facebook alongside people he was personally familiar with, for all the harassment.

I have invested substantial time and effort into the matter, and I cannot find a single piece of evidence suggesting that the above is not true. He has, however, filed ~4 restraining orders against KF users, none of which were ever granted.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

I could be wrong but it seems to me that a lot of dumbass's complaints boil down to "I didn't know I had to do X because no one told me to do X and everyone should've worked around my dumbass and did X for me." It's a good thing he is such a pathetic creature. Now if only the court would do something about this fucking retard instead of punishing Null with this faggotry because they can.

Greer's damn email is hiding the evidence! I guess him thinking he did something is good enough.

Barnhardt also believes that plaintiff Russell Greer inadvertently sent him an email message detailing the time he got his dick partially ripped off when Greer stuck it in a vacuum cleaner. Further corespondence was spent discussing different vacuum cleaners and their power settings to best achieve simulated fellatio without causing undo damage to the plaintiff. Barnhardt, however, has a glitchy email (it's just email and not a server or service provider or app) and can't find this totes real message, for sure. Barnhardt asks the court to move this statement into evidence of plaintiff Greer being a nasty ass vacuum fucker.

In a court of law you can just say things and they'll be true.

 

[and six goriilion others]

Greer says in this motion that people see the "unredacted" filings, so personal information in there is dangerous. He also now says one of the addresses he provided is of his family, and then proceeds to publish that address himself in this filing (exhibit E). While also arguing he (after initially inadvertently failing to designate it as such) later designated that address as confidential so it wouldn't show up in filings that people can see.

So he's saying he himself now violated the SPO with this motion? Surely you you can't be believed it's confidential, and in the same motion still publish it yourself.

 

[AnOminous]

Without having read the entire motion, it appears facially invalid from the get go

But poor crippled disabled retarded Russhole didn't READ the email he got from Hardin informing him of FRCP 11(c)(2). He THOUGHT he could just file a sanctions motion without doing that.

So Hardin should be SANCTIONED for constantly SPAMMING HIM WITH EMAILS notifying him of the rules he had to follow!

Also, quite the trick filing a Rule 11 motion that is itself sanctionably frivolous under Rule 11 itself.

 

[obsdj]

I am really looking forward to how the court bends itself over AGAIN to ignore this absolute wealth of retardation and straight up contemptuous behavior.

Seriously, the Zoom meeting is going to be a thing of beauty. I can't wait to watch the judge try to keep himself composed.

Oh, he also put the Keffals article in the exhibits.

He pasted a screenshot of a news website's headline into the exhibits.

I could be wrong but it seems to me that a lot of dumbass's complaints boil down to "I didn't know I had to do X because no one told me to do X and everyone should've worked around my dumbass and did X for me."

And yet, several years of recorded history at this point shows that the retard is fully capable of researching and citing all manner of extensive caselaw in his filings. Granted, he is generally full of shit and his citations are fanciful at best, but it's plainly obvious that he knows how to look things up. His protestations of not being able to find much less read the SPO beggar belief. I desperately hope Hardin points this out to the judge, succinctly and without paragraphs of fanciful prose and sarcasm.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF No. 264 and 265

 

[The Man With No Name]

Russ really trying to take as many bites of the exact same apple as possible, and now trying to punish Hardin for...the court agreeing with him.

I think what's also funny is that Russ's proposed monetary sanction does not make anything whole, even if there was any validity to his claim. He'd be seeking an alternative type of sanction for this typically, and he's just seeking money so he doesn't owe Null anything and also can get more whore bucks. His recalcitrance is transparent at this point.

 

[AnOminous]

His protestations of not being able to find much less read the SPO beggar belief. I desperately hope Hardin points this out to the judge, succinctly and without paragraphs of fanciful prose and sarcasm.

The judge literally personally told him what the SPO was and where he could see it and directed him to a helpful video with a tard-level explanation of the rules he needed to follow, which he made specifically for tards like Russhole.

Russhole just ignored it.

This is just like when the judge in the Taylor Swift case explained to him how to serve Taylor Swift, in tiny tard words even a tard like Russhole should have been able to understand, and Russhole just ignored the judge and lost his case.

And it's also just like when the previous judge in small claims (Ariana Grande I think?) explained to him what it meant to state a cause of action, that he needed to do it, and how he could do it, and Russhole ignored the judge and lost his case and then screeched autistically about the "bias judge."

This is the one case where despite the retard ignoring every single rule, he's been hand-held like a little piss baby for four FUCKING YEARS.

One thing I have to hand it to Hardin for. It was quite prescient for him to cite the specific rule to Russhole the day before he frivolously filed his motion, informing him he had to provide a copy 21 days in advance. Retard boy went and vexatiously filed it the next day out of spite, literally DELIBERATELY violating the rule.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Lol, Greer says it took him two fucking months to research the SPO



Also says he's a full time student, has he actually provided proof he's enrolled in any school now?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Isn't every single filing of Russ' at this point contain this exact same phrase?

Lol, Greer says it took him two fucking months to research the SPO

It takes like 5 minutes to read the SPO. He had no caselaw on what either of the definitions were interpreted as, so I'm not sure how he wasted away two months

 

[obsdj]

Wyświetl załącznik 7147691

Hee.

Hee.



The hell? ECF 260 is the judge's order setting the Zoom meeting.


IT'S MY TURRRRRRRRRRN


Now this is interesting. Greer includes screenshots of a suspiciously-truncated email from Hardin in which Hardin most helpfully offers Greer a chance to talk his way out of further sanctions. What I would like to know is whether Hardin has (privately) now proceeded with sanctions on ECF 213 by duly notifying Greer 21 days in advance of filing, as he correctly did on his previous sanction request (ECF 234). The fact that Greer cut off the email screenshots in that spot suggests to me that Hardin had more to say that might be juicy, but that Greer didn't want to risk us seeing.

 

[BoomerPrime]

Isn't every single filing of Russ' at this point contain this exact same phrase?
Wyświetl załącznik 7147715

He probably thinks this is one of those magical phrases that makes the Judge give him what he wants, like "pro se" and "the 10th Circuit said..." ..and to be honest why wouldn't he think that, given the Judge has coddled his shitlipped ass since this case came back to Utah.

It takes like 5 minutes to read the SPO. He had no caselaw on what either of the definitions were interpreted as, so I'm not sure how he wasted away two months

When humans construct something to be retard-proof, nature comes along and builds a bigger, more retarded retard.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

With each passing day, the District Judge's decision seems more and more wrong...

 

[The Un-Clit]

One problem is that this wasn't served on Mr. Hardin prior. See (from ECF 262):
Wyświetl załącznik 7147334
Without having read the entire motion, it appears facially invalid from the get go

What an absolute numpty. Hardin even TOLD him that he has to be served this 3 weeks before it can be filed with the court ffs! It'll be tossed instantly. If Ratmouth wasn't pro se, he would be sanctioned again for this failure too.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

If Ratmouth wasn't pro se, he would be sanctioned again for this failure too.

Pro se individuals are entirely subject to sanctions, even ones for failing to follow court rules.

 

[CansOfCant]

I love this admission.