Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) 1 2 3
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
It's like a joke

I don’t even know what to say.

After two judges and a bar-licensed lawyer have all told you that Hardin did not violate the protective order, you’re still going to insist that he did? How can Greer keep rationalizing this? Is he even rationalizing it? Does he even believe the things he’s saying?

In the same filing, Greer insists he both read and did not read the SPO. “Never saw the protective order”. That means you didn’t read it, you faggot.

“Plaintiff had no idea he had to write “for attorney’s eyes only”.” That’s because you didn’t read the SPO. Ignorance is no excuse in this case. There’s no legal leeway. You either read the SPO or you didn’t.

I also like to think that Greer didn’t even bother to cite any case law this time because he’s fucked himself so badly that there’s no argument that can save him now. He will just scream at the judge that Hardin violated the SPO until the judge just warps reality to make it true (which will not happen. We’ve seen the judge’s opinion on this already).

I’m being mindful not to inadvertently help Greer in his case but I’m convinced he’s not just too retarded, but he’s also too egotistical. I apologize to J.Moony for having to treat this man as a legitimate litigator. The patience required for that along should qualify Josh for sainthood.

“I have no case, and I must scream” -Russell Greer
 
Its like a script from Larry David...

1741192699195.png

2 lines down:

1741192720782.png

I know his mouth is mush, but is he blind, and read a braille version instead?

Edit to avoid double posting...

1741193130052.png

How would Greer know it was published on the kiwi farms, unless he was a...kiwi farms user?!?! And how are you going to prove a kiwi farms user was the one who did the "harass Plaintiff with the information"? It could be any user of PACER, including any member of the 10th District Court! I hope this claim gets struck.

1741193328764.png

You said it Russ. That is my conclusion as well, reading this filing.

Edit, Last one I swear..
1741193795265.png

Simmer the fuck down Hardship, or you're gonna face the Mushlip!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Also the "I'm just a retard your honor" defence makes me so fucking MATI,
Josh should apologize to Ralph. Ralph was just doing his best, but Greer has produced more versions of "I'm just a retard" than anyone else on the site.

By the way:
1741192773030.png

I've lost track of how many times Russ has complained about this. But IIRC not once has he admitted that after the filing, nobody harassed his family. His big fear was unfounded. The "harass Plaintiff" he's whining about was an anon email that literally just sent the info back to him and called him dumb. (And I still suspect he sent it himself.)

He's making his last stand against sanctions, pleading the worst case and reduced to admitting he made groundless assumptions, and he still can't point to any actual harm that happened here.
 
It's like a joke

It's juvenile, in a way, that plaintiff is once again overburdening this court by continuing to file responses to defence motions.

Plaintiff should just bend over and take it up the arse. That's where it's going to end up eventually, he might as well just accept his fate now and set up a standing order to pay Null his miniscule earnings for the next forty years.
 
This is just astonishing, especially coming from someone who (sort of) graduated from paralegal school. I genuinely would like for someone to ask him, in a formal setting, exactly what he thinks the role of an attorney, and especially a defense attorney, is. Does he honestly think that their job is to simply roll over and accept whatever he files uncritically and without reply?

Also: Why do I get the feeling that he's trying (unsuccessfully, of course maybe possibly I hope) to set up grounds for an appeal?
He's said repeatedly that Null's attorney is supposed to be a neutral third party that helps Greer out just as much as he helps Null.

He has no idea what an attorney does. They're like the hall monitors in the eternal high school that is his life, at least while he's visiting the "lawsuit campus."
 
Imagine the laboured, conscious sigh of contempt and resignation the court must experience everytime they receive another one of Greer's. "Ah bloo bloo, I MUST WIN by default for being cursed as a retard!!!" filings.

The judge's coffee cup and stress ball must be used very regularly.
the judge wants it to be exactly this way and no other way and he has done a lot to make it so. no need to feel pity for him.

Lolwut? I'm late to this thread, what has Harden breached? I imagine nothing and Greer is grasping at straws.
nigger, forgetting to lurk before you tardpost could possibly be forgivable but the fact that you havent even read greers fucking motion youre now commenting on... jesus fuck this threads gonna be relocked again in a few hours tops wont it
 
It's been said a few times that Plaintiff thinks that Hardin is his attorney (or at least some neutral party) and is being unethical by advocating for his employer. It sounds insane but the more filings he shits out the more I believe it. Like maybe he thinks that because he chose to pursue this pro-se it precludes the defense's ability to be represented as well.
He doesn't think the 10th Circuit ruling reads "If we assume everything Shitlips says is true, as well as contort the law like an 1800s Russian circus freak and invoke time travel, then he has stated a claim that needs to be examined rather than dismissed." He thinks they said "Russel Greer is the bestest boy who ever lived and a law expert who makes Cochran look pedestrian. He has proven that Moon and Kiwi Farms, a website, have willfully and maliciously intruded upon his copyright and personal rights. We are ordering this case be sent back and for it to be adjudicated in his favor."

That's why Hardin is being petty, juvenile, unprofessional, etc. and why Null is an asshole for not settling. In his mind, the appeals court says Russel Greer won this lawsuit, and the only thing Hardin is doing is delaying for the sake of delaying.
 
How would Greer know it was published on the kiwi farms, unless he was a...kiwi farms user?!?! And how are you going to prove a kiwi farms user was the one who did the "harass Plaintiff with the information"?

If Russ has a KF account, and he somehow knows a complete anon who sent him a Russ-styled email is a KF user...

:thinking:
 
If he ever submits that motion would a bad faith motion for sanctions itself be considered sanctionable conduct?

He's been told repeatedly that the SPO wasn't violated so if he does go ahead and file it there should be some consequences. Although with this court it will likely be a strongly weakly worded denial.
 
Plaintiff Greer is right about everything, and I don't actually need him to prove it in any form. His law skills are frankly stunning and better than both myself and the judge's, which is why he was able to intuit the SPO without ever reading it or invoking it.
The filing reads like a teenager going "no you". It is not I WHO WILL PAY SANCTIONS IT IS YOU WHO WILL PAY SANCTIONS. Enjoy Sanctions Stalker child.

Plaintiff's motion for sanctions incoming. Dis gun b gud.
Anytime anything happens in this Case Greer can't help but make a skinwalker argument that copies whatever someone did to him, but it turns out absolutely schizophrenic and incoherent because courts and lawyers use specific reasons Greer doesn't have the expertise or cognitive ability to understand.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole