US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
All anime. It's the collective output of the repressed Japanese soul damaged by WWII fed back into itself in a never ending loop which is why the earlier stuff SEEMS more sane.
At least earlier animanga tended to be influenced by mainly non-animanga works, which is why older animanga seems more "normal". The problem came when anime and manga started to take influences from other anime and manga, starting an incestuous cycle that flanderized all the worst aspects of the medium. It didn't help that Japan's post-war economic prosperity came to an end in the 90s with the Lost Decade(s), contributing to the NEETification of much of Japan's populace and making it so that the animanga industry had to cater to a niche group of otakus and their degenerate tastes in order to survive since they consoomed much more than the broader normie populace.
 
Seethe impotently as the Russo-American Co-Dominium becomes the global powerhouse.
I find it very unlikely but it would be really funny, especially if the US turns Canada and Greenland into US territories, that the Arctic would be both parties' collective hat.
 
I’m reasonably confident the Trump administration conceded no such authority to the WHCA because that would be really off character so far.

I am really enjoying watching libtard judges flail about trying to find some authority the President has to submit to that can tell him who to invite to parties or what color tie he's allowed to wear. Here, you fucking retards, here's the list of authorities over the President:
  1. The Constitution
  2. Congress
That's it. No, there is no authority over the President when it comes to which reporters he's required to invite to White House events. How are you confused about this? Are you stupid?

Why was AP even granted standing? Nobody should have standing to demand access to the White House or Air Force One. Somehow, nobody has standing to contest election fraud, but a private corporation has standing to demand that the President allow them into his house.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 7021513
Apparently the Eagles are visiting the White House. They are just waiting for the invite. So, The whole they are skipping out on the visit was just people trying to wish it into existence I guess.
Think he'll feed them McDonald's in white house again. Trump really is Andrew Jackson in how he don't give shit about being "presidential".
McDicks.jpg
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Anyone hoping trump seizes power over Democrats for life if Dems and Globehomos try the most craziest shit possible to dethrone him?
Again, Trump is old. What good is "President for life" if he just croaks in 7 years. Hell, he may not even live to the end of his term. He's at that age where the Widowmaker Heart Attack or a Stroke could hit him completely out of the blue. It would do irreversible damage to his cause. Trumps goal at this juncture should be to plow over the weed infested field that is the American State, and plant the seeds that will bring forth good and use plants in the future.
 
And now I'm caught up.

I wonder if DOGE will be posting the number of e-mails they recieved and how many have been accepted as possibly legitimate and how many have been rejected as nonsense?
I hope they publish a selection of the worst responses they got.

And just to throw my hat in the ring: At my job I report what I did weekly to my supervisor and sometimes daily if I'm working on a project with a lot going on. I cannot imagine having a job where this is an unreasonable request.
 
W

Which is funny because Fascism isn't even intrinsically racist. Nazism is but Fascism isn't Nazism. In fact, Fascism literally cannot compare to Communism whatsoever if you look at just fascism and don't count the Nazis (Who weren't Fascist). With Fascists you have Franco (Who abandoned Fascism), Mussolini, and Mosely. Compare them to Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot. It's night and day with just how destructive and totalitarian the latter were. Also the latter were more racist too.
Libtards, and frankly most people don't understand what fascism is. Fascism does not have any singular doctrine or system, the main goal of fascism is to obtain power through whatever means necessary so you can revolutionize the spirit of the nation and bring about whatever your group decides is utopia by changing mens souls through force. You can be a libertarian fascist, an anarcho-fascist, a vegan fascist, a carnivore-fascist. Because fascism is just marxism but without a singular defined goal other than to bring about whatever the nations idea of utopia is through violent force and rebirth of the human spirit to bring about a man who will make that utopia possible.

In other words, fascism is marxism but honest and without a singular doctrine of the utopia it seeks to bring about.
1: Use whatever means possible to gain power
2: Violently crush your enemies
3: Somehow remake the soul of man and create your own personal/national utopia

To paraphrase both Hitler and Musollini "What is our plan? Our plan is to govern Italy".
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
i used to browse /r/askreddit back in the mid 10s, wanted to see if it cucked out. sorted by top this month and it's almost all trump shit

Wyświetl załącznik 7021500

even the "fun" parts of reddit are cucked

It's been like this ever since inauguration like clock work.

*trump/musk says/does [X]*
*literally 10 seconds later*
/r/AskReddit: "Conservatives/Americans/Europeans/Canadians, how do you feel about Trump/Musk/USA doing [X]?"
 
I really don't know what the big deal is. I've worked jobs where I had to summarize what I did for the past week, every week, for years while working there.
It didn't have to be super complicated or detailed just giving management an idea of what I did, what I tended to focus on, and what longer term things I was working on (job related education, projects in the department outside of the day to day stuff).
It was tedious but it was part of the job so they could see who was overworked versus who was stagnating, if more people needed to be added to a given department (e.g. if everyone was indicating they were taking on too much), or if the department could be downsized and people shifted around to other departments or projects for the time being while it was quieter (smaller company in one case did this to best use who they had)
Feds getting bent out of shape over being asked to do this as a one time thing is ridiculous.
Everyone should reply easily. Even the ones where it feels obvious what the answer should be so the larger shape of the department can be scoped out by the people doing the review.
These fucking fed worms are spoiled as fuck.
I had a job that did maintenance work and we had to write down our entire shift at shift change, every day. You could go back 15+ years and read the documents. Were they detailed notes? Hell no. But you could go back and read about some piece of equipment having minor failures months before it broke down.

It's not an unreasonable ask. At all. They just are having a tantrum that their boss -- and Trump is their boss and Elon is his agent, eat shit and die fedboys -- is imposing rules on them. Rules they think they should be immune to. From someone they don't think should have authority over them.

They're spoiled children pissed that they're being told to behave. That's the mindset. I ruined several jobs myself back in the day with that fucking mindset. It's horrifying to see it crop up in our government servants, but perhaps not unsurprising.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole