💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Nick ran with the grain of the cocaine, Aaron went against it.

You have to go with the grain of the coke, Ari-bobandy.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Kayla testifying and keeping Nick away from the case entirely would be the best way to do it. If she is going to testify, there isn't any reason whatsoever for him to testify that I can think of. What can he testify to:

A very basic fact that will need either Nick or Kayla to testify is that the photo is of Kayla. Presumably, Geno has never seen her naked so while he can testify that he received A photo, Nick or Kayla would have to establish it was a photo of Kayla.

There are other things I would think Kayla would need to testify about so not sure why it would be Nick. I guess Nick could lie about the Signal app and say Aaron would have had to purposefully and maliciously circumvent privacy features to share the picture "everyone knew was private."

"It was at that exact moment when Aaron removed muh watermark."

 

[ChromaQuack]

"It was at that exact moment when Aaron removed muh watermark."

But if Aaron removed or modified the watermark in any shape or form that means it's a completely different picture and not the one sent by Qayla.

Same deal if it was a mere screenshot of the photo, or the EXIF data was stripped even by automated means, different picture. This is what amazing internet lawyer and fashionista Nick Rekieta has told me.

 

[Desktop User2]

About the CA, this interview about receiving the ATHENA award from the Woman´s Fund of Central Minnesota is pretty telling:

7:10 "Yes, I am a warrior. A warrior for victims rights"

https://www.communitygiving.org/legacy-story/janelle-kendall/

She is focused on DV and women and children rights. Not keen on cameras in court.
Does not seen like man hating but pretty empathetic towards women; it explains why this is going to trial, probably.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

A very basic fact that will need either Nick or Kayla to testify is that the photo is of Kayla. Presumably, Geno has never seen her naked so while he can testify that he received A photo, Nick or Kayla would have to establish it was a photo of Kayla.

You might like to hope that they would need to testify to establish that fact... but they actually don't.

Geno now claims that visible in the image was a tattoo of Nick's name under her left breast, saying:
"It's not a good picture. You have a tattoo of Nick's name under your left tit. IT'S GROSS. IT'S GROSS. IT'S GROSS."

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

3919296-f1e1be9afe2836029bb4059f2333e70d.mp4

That is one ugly, psycho looking woman. The eyes are the window to the soul. This broads eyes say she's a full on unhinged psychopath bitch. Imagine just having a conversation with her face to face and she starts pulling the "im gonna kill you look".

Unnerving.

 

[ChromaQuack]

That is one ugly, psycho looking woman. The eyes are the window to the soul. This broads eyes say she's a full on unhinged psychopath bitch. Imagine just having a conversation with her face to face and she starts pulling the "im gonna kill you look".

Unnerving.

Sorry buddy, this is your new profile picture now.

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

Wyświetl załącznik 7002716
Sorry buddy, this is your new profile picture now.

Christ. Would not bang/10

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Steel Toe needs to subpoena Camelot. The court needs to know exactly how much this witness was spending every month on cocaine and whores.

I assume you're being silly, but Camelot only knows what Nick has told him or that he used his brain power to extrapolate from observation and Nick's words. In other words, nothing.

About the CA, this interview about receiving the ATHENA award from the Woman´s Fund of Central Minnesota is pretty telling:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fy7_WltGjis7:10 "Yes, I am a warrior. A warrior for victims rights"

https://www.communitygiving.org/legacy-story/janelle-kendall/

She is focused on DV and women and children rights. Not keen on cameras in court.
Does not seen like man hating but pretty empathetic towards women; it explains why this is going to trial, probably.

I see nothing wrong with this, and nothing "feminazi" (referring back to another comment) about her.

Knowing what we know, this case is dumb bc the real harm to Kayla is Nick, but from an outside perspective, I can see how it looks. And I don't have a problem with a prosecutor focusing on crimes that typically go unpunished. It's unfortunate that she's not in Kandiyohi County and focusing on smug cokeheads endangering their kids.

@Biggus McDickus apologies! I thought your comment was about Kendall so gave you a mean rate, which I've now retracted.

 

[200MB]

That is one ugly, psycho looking woman. The eyes are the window to the soul. This broads eyes say she's a full on unhinged psychopath bitch. Imagine just having a conversation with her face to face and she starts pulling the "im gonna kill you look".

Unnerving.

Taking Nick's mother into account

maybe he fell for April because she was the first woman in his life that didn't look completely deranged.

 

[Chazzed Up]

About the CA, this interview about receiving the ATHENA award from the Woman´s Fund of Central Minnesota is pretty telling:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fy7_WltGjis7:10 "Yes, I am a warrior. A warrior for victims rights"

https://www.communitygiving.org/legacy-story/janelle-kendall/

She is focused on DV and women and children rights. Not keen on cameras in court.
Does not seen like man hating but pretty empathetic towards women; it explains why this is going to trial, probably.

If I saw that a revenge porn conflict was stemming from a polycule of druggies whose kid tested positive for coke, I'd find something better to spend taxpayer money on. Like taking the Rekietas' fucking kids from them before Nick gets any more opportunities to drug and probably molest his daughter.

(Yes I know it isn't the same jurisdiction, but wouldn't it be nice.)

 

[Swole McPole]

I assume you're being silly, but Camelot only knows what Nick has told him or that he used his brain power to extrapolate from observation and Nick's words. In other words, nothing.

I was being silly -- I didn't really think anybody was going to subpoena Camelot. But it doesn't seem fair that his testimony wouldn't be allowed. People get convicted all the time on the basis of what a jailhouse snitch claims the accused told them. Camelot at least has direct knowledge of Nick's whoring in Las Vegas, and claims Rekieta told him what his monthly spend on cocaine and whores was. Surely that should be at least as admissible as when your celly claims that you told him you shot that guy from the other gang because you didn't like his face. Those cases don't seem to require any confirmatory evidence at all and yet people get convicted on the basis of such testimony all the time. Even when celly has been promised a get out of jail free card in return for their evidence.

But I have no knowledge at all of the rules of evidence in US courts, so I'm happy to take your word for it.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

What could Nick possibly testify about in this case?

• Who took the picture, but only if Nick was the one to take it or send it.
• If the State has the photo, he could testify that it is indeed his wife (although maybe Kayla would have to do that)
• If the picture was sent into a group (Signal) message that he was part of, he could testify that it existed and Aaron had access. If so, any agreement about sharing stuff. (Likely not written anywhere.)
• Any direct impact to him (as Kayla would have to testify about the impact to her)
• Background information that NICK SAW about the qover
• Any supposed harassment Nick suffered from Aaron.

It's just such a nothing burger. If the message wasn't sent in a group message and Nick didn't take it, I don't even know they need to call him. But Lord help the State if they do... Actually no, fuck the State. It's a shit law and a shit case to bring forward.

The original police complaint said KR sent the photo to Aaron in a group signal chat and that everyone knew they were to be kept private. Nick could testify to that.

I've been busy and I'm not caught up, but everyone to remember that it isn't just the state that can subpoena witnesses. Aaron's team can as well. I'm not sure if there is any paperwork out there on how subpoenaed Nick.

It becomes much more obvious if the subpoena came from Aaron's side.

 

[Strix454]

You might like to hope that they would need to testify to establish that fact... but they actually don't.

He does need to testify to establish the fact. The statement however pins him down in terms of what he can say in his testimony. It almost traps him into confirming the photograph is Kayla. Depending how he described the tattoo.

 

[Melty Butter]

About the CA, this interview about receiving the ATHENA award from the Woman´s Fund of Central Minnesota is pretty telling:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Fy7_WltGjis7:10 "Yes, I am a warrior. A warrior for victims rights"

https://www.communitygiving.org/legacy-story/janelle-kendall/

She is focused on DV and women and children rights. Not keen on cameras in court.
Does not seen like man hating but pretty empathetic towards women; it explains why this is going to trial, probably.

Interesting.

People can nitpick at her politics. I'd argue they're very 2nd stage feminism vs 3rd (much worse).

Who in Central MN would argue with going after a right-wing problematic polyicule-member, molly-enjoyed, fired radio morning show host who recklessly sent a naked pic to a pathetic comedian while on a live stream with 400+ people watching?

That's an easy conviction.

@Potentially Criminal spent most of tonight (on his stream and then KC) arguing FOR Destiny's BPD "victims" of revenge porn. Same difference.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

The prosecutor would immediately shut down any question steering away from the case. You people keep forgetting this is not a civil case.

As already stated his credibility is always relevant.

*bunch of stuff I agree with*

Imagine putting Nick under cross-examination and cutting him off with a few........."Sir, yes or no, please. You can explain things with the prosecutor...............Your honor, this is a non-responsive answer. Move to strike"..............he'll lose his fucking mind and start falling apart.

His ODD will be on full display, and he'll get even more upset because he can't string together thoughts and he'll know he's looking like a retard. He'll know that he's fucking things up and this is helping Aaron, which ratchets things up even more. Maybe Aaron looks him in the eye, maybe there's a smirk and he gets even more agitated. Then his "heat allergy" kicks in.

And just wait until Aaron's attorney brings up the issue of Nick blaming Aaron for the drug raid and his guilty plea. That will be fucking hilarious.

When he's up on the stand, he's not going to be able to hide behind the screen and take some hits off his vape or a swig of booze to even himself out.

TBF I have no idea why the fuck would he be summoned to testify, maybe the prosecutor is also retarded; unless it was Aaron´s defense idea which would reach even a new level of stupidity.

Very likely the prosecution has never sat down with him face to face yet and really interviewed him and prepped him for trial. They don't know his brain is fried and that he can't string thoughts together.

Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick.

It's 3 v 1 on the answer of "We all agreed to keep things private"....Juries sometimes eat that shit up.

Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.

No way in hell would I voluntarily subpoena Nick as Defense Counsel. That's like playing soccer with an IED. Also, he "went and picked it up" indicating, to me (a big retard, so I could be wrong) that he and Qayla drove out to St. Cloud to get them.

It's a weird choice because putting the subhuman piece of shit that is Cuckieta up against even a shitty member of the human race is going to make the other guy look better in comparison.

They've probably had the Defense Attorney telling them Nick is a huge turd and likely brushed him off because of course Defense Counsel always says stuff like that. Hell, I do it. They don't know what they don't know.

Wouldn't be the first time that interviewing your witnesses makes you realize your case is a stinker.

even though it was beyond retarded for Aaron to hope that distracting prosecutors with the cybercrime shit would magically get them to drop his own case

Most offices would bail once this started happening along with the issue of witnesses who lived 1,000 miles away are refusing to appear.

 

[Melty Butter]

Most offices would bail once this started happening along with the issue of witnesses who lived 1,000 miles away are refusing to appear.

So, no cybercrime charges then? Care to elaborate?

 

[Potentially Criminal]

So, no cybercrime charges then? Care to elaborate?

No, I mean most prosecutors would have bailed on the revenge porn charges once the victim's husband, and one of your critical witnesses, starts harassing the Defendant and committing crimes against said Defendant.

As I've said before, there are real victims that need real help, and will not dick up a case.

 

[thebigdream]

While not the smartest idea, I can respect Aaron for taking this all the way. How the Rekietas behave in court is a huge unknown with the potential to overturn the entire case and I doubt they were prepared for this eventuality, thinking that he'd take the plea. I must imagine that Kayla would be a nervous wreck on the stand, she can't seem to act normal in even the most brief appearances on Nick's streams, and those were all before the drug use really kicked off. I think Nick on a good day could fool some jurors, Aaron would be prudent to needle him into letting the full cryptid out. Hard to say how the jurors will view them as a couple.

I think the jurors would have to really find Aaron distasteful to press for the full felony, though his past restraining orders (as bs as they are) won't help him. I know if I were in their shoes, the background of the case would make me roll my eyes. Just junkies doing junkie shit, and from a certain perspective, someone getting what they deserve for sending sexual images outside her marriage, and for failing to establish the consent of those images.

 

[Melty Butter]

While not the smartest idea, I can respect Aaron for taking this all the way. How the Rekietas behave in court is a huge unknown with the potential to overturn the entire case and I doubt they were prepared for this eventuality, thinking that he'd take the plea. I must imagine that Kayla would be a nervous wreck on the stand, she can't seem to act normal in even the most brief appearances on Nick's streams, and those were all before the drug use really kicked off. I think Nick on a good day could fool some jurors, Aaron would be prudent to needle him into letting the full cryptid out.

The jurors would have to really find Aaron distasteful to press for the full felony. I know if I were in their shoes, the background of the case would make me roll my eyes. Just junkies doing junkie shit, and from a certain perspective, someone getting what they deserve for sending sexual images outside her marriage, and for failing to establish the consent of those images.

Respectfully, it's RETARDED for Aaron to take this to trial UNLESS he thinks the cybercrime issue is at play which @Potentially Criminal has just cryptically dismissed as an issue atp. (Btw, Sean speaks with Aaron - well documented.)

So, unless Aaron is biding for time in the cybercrime nonsense, he's just waiting for a better deal on the RP case. My deduction.

He's getting convicted. It's on tape.