💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%

  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%

  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%

  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%

  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%
  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wyróżnienie
AnOminous powiedział(a):
Anything he's said in public is fair game. The only issue is whether it's more prejudicial than probative. So maybe some of the more salacious details would be shut down, but not the general existence of the Qover and that Nick rants insanely all day long about the guy swallowing his cum, nor the fact that he's publicly given at least half a dozen different completely contradictory and often unintelligible, incoherent lies about every single event in their shared lives.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Still dont understand why the prosecution would want the stupidest man in Universe anywhere near their case but hey ho...
 
Desktop User2 powiedział(a):
Still dont understand why the prosecution would want the stupidest man in Universe anywhere near their case but hey ho...
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.
 
AnOminous powiedział(a):
It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I dont know if we have the summon but it would be hilarious if it was requested by Aaron´s lawyer because of their goose chase about the hacking. Then we would be dealing with absolute dimwittery.
 
Captain Manning powiedział(a):
Barnes was treating this like the Nick's livestreams are some ethereal realm where the law can not touch Nick.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

This is where that retarded giant baby really annoys me. He acts as if they can’t get a warrant because it’s a copy of the video. It’s like saying that the cops can’t get a warrant because they told a judge they watched the security footage of someone robbing a bank but didn’t specify they watched a copy of the footage. Pure legalistic slap-dick bullshit.
 
AnOminous powiedział(a):
Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.
 
Dixieland Buckaroo powiedział(a):
Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's a weird choice because putting the subhuman piece of shit that is Cuckieta up against even a shitty member of the human race is going to make the other guy look better in comparison.

Even in just the last 24 hours, you have the cuck contradicting a previous lie about the baseball bat story.

It's like a bounty of riches for cross examination. You have more lies than you could possibly go through in a cross examination, and that's even if you leave the disgusting, degenerate sex shit on the ground.
 
Dixieland Buckaroo powiedział(a):
Yesh there's not a lot for the State to get out of Nick, but a whole lot Aaron's team could get out of Nick. Very odd, unless the subpoena was from the defense.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Is Kayla testifying? Because if she is not, there are several details in terms of the case that only Nick could really provide. But the problem is that he isn't going to be a good, sympathetic or credible witness. And he will end up fielding questions about Aaron's relationship with his wife that going to make him look a like cuck to the jury.

A woman in this situation is going to get jury sympathy. But Nick? None at all.
 
AnOminous powiedział(a):
I hope he does. About the only thing that could get Aaron acquitted at this point is this repulsive cocksucker disgusting the jury with what an absolute subhuman mess he is. I know if I were on a jury and this slimy little cuck was a witness against the accused I'd be looking for excuses for jury nullification.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Jury Foreman: "Your honor, we find the Defendant, Aaron Imholte, not guilty, on the basis that nobody... including and especially the victim and her husband... give a single solitary fuck that he showed a nude picture of the victim to Geno."

Judge: "I'll allow it."

Nick: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
:really:

...

Well, probably not, but a guy can dream, can't he?

AnOminous powiedział(a):
It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Something something principle, I guess.

There's a theory making the rounds that the county attorney is a hard charging feminazi, but I don't know if I buy that given it's a Republican leaning county, and she was reelected in 2022 unopposed.

Course, Aaron isn't helping matters by being a fucking idiot, like he always is, and not just accepting the misdemeanor.

With the evidence they apparently do have on him, I wouldn't call her bluff in this case. It's possible he'll be convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor, but not the felony, and the end result would be little different than the plea deal, but that seems like an awful risk to take here.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Strix454 powiedział(a):
Is Kayla testifying? Because if she is not, there are several details in terms of the case that only Nick could really provide. But the problem is that he isn't going to be a good, sympathetic or credible witness. And he will end up fielding questions about Aaron's relationship with his wife that going to make him look a like cuck to the jury.

A woman in this situation is going to get jury sympathy. But Nick? None at all.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Nick said he and Kayla got subpoenaed, at least from the Wil Herren vid I saw. Nick seemed to confirm:

I don't know that I agree Kayla will appear sympathetic. She will need to be at just the right level of drugged out to testify and appear human, and I think that's a very small window. We know Kayla has thought of herself as an actress, but that was before her last couple of braincells were cracked and gassed out of existence.

Aaron's lawyer 100% should hire a female attorney to do Kayla's (cross) examination.
Edit to add: Wil Herren vid with Nick chats, confirming the Kayla subpoena.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Dixieland Buckaroo powiedział(a):
Nick said he and Kayla got subpoenaed, at least from the chats I saw.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Kayla testifying and keeping Nick away from the case entirely would be the best way to do it. If she is going to testify, there isn't any reason whatsoever for him to testify that I can think of. What can he testify to:

"Yes your honor. I used the signal app to transfer a nude photo of my prudent wife to my wife's boyfriend"

"Yes your honor. My wife shared a nude photo with her boyfriend who shared it with one guy and I'm totally put out at the harm that its done to our loving marriage"

The whole case in that it involves a whole pack of drug user swingers airing out disputes in their sex lives is just disgusting and I still don't understand why the DA has not washed her hands of this a long time ago. This is more old-school Jerry Springer than it is courtroom stuff.
 
Nick takes the stand, Aaron's lawyer approaches for his opening question.

Aaron's lawyer: Mr Rekieta, faggot white bread ass niggas say what.
Nick: What?!
 
AnOminous powiedział(a):
It's kind of a mystery to me why they're even bothering to prosecute this bullshit at all, much less with a witless witness like Nick who couldn't tell a believable lie to save his worthless cucked life.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's clearly politically motivated. The feminist prosecutor is on a mission to hold the Patriarchy responsible and will stop at nothing to achieve it. Nick was given a slap on the wrist because the court wants to protect a fellow colleague and fellow alumnus, no such privileges exist for Aaron.

Remember when Boss Baby Barnes was telling everyone how corrupt the MN courts are? That wasn't a cope, that was confession through projection.
 
Rodeo Roadrunner powiedział(a):
Nick will have to testify TO A JURY about how he was sharing his wife with other men, about how other men had sex with his wife, and how his wife was sharing pictures of herself with other men. Nick, in his quest to 'own' Aaron, will have to go on the record FOR A SECOND TIME that he is a cuckhold, and how Aaron and Kayla's relationship made him jealous. How is this a win for Nick again?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Because his humiliation fetish/need to make people uncomfortable with how much of a sexually degenerate reprobate he is are the only things that get the blood flowing to his limp, broken dick.

He is very much like a troon in that regard, he relishes any opportunity to make people uncomfortable in a deranged manner while they cannot fight it back.
 
Father Balldo powiedział(a):
Nick fucks up everything he's involved with and Aaron has the uncanny ability to blindly avoid danger like Mr. Magoo.

In short, ANOTHER WIN FOR THE TOE incoming.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
At the very least Aaron would have to spend 5 figures to dismiss the lawsuit which could very well fuck him

I do think Nick thinks he's gonna win big
 
Captain Manning powiedział(a):
There's a theory making the rounds that the county attorney is a hard charging feminazi, but I don't know if I buy that given it's a Republican leaning county, and she was reelected in 2022 unopposed.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I remember someone researched her when we got the court filing.
This is what I got on a quick search:

“I love it. I personally love it,” Kari Dahlen, a recent law school graduate, said of the team’s outspokenness about equality. “I think it empowers a lot of women the way they’re standing up for women in general in sports, really trying to fight for equal pay.”

On an intimate partner violence prosecution conference:
Case Study: Prosecuting an IPV Case with an Uncooperative Victim – Kari Dahlen, Assistant Stearns County Attorney


ETA: Oh shit, I fucked up. That is just the prosecutor. The DA, Janelle Kendall, is the feminazi:
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole