💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%

  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%

  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%

  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%

  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%
  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wyróżnienie
What could Nick possibly testify about in this case?
  • Who took the picture, but only if Nick was the one to take it or send it.
  • If the State has the photo, he could testify that it is indeed his wife (although maybe Kayla would have to do that)
  • If the picture was sent into a group (Signal) message that he was part of, he could testify that it existed and Aaron had access. If so, any agreement about sharing stuff. (Likely not written anywhere.)
  • Any direct impact to him (as Kayla would have to testify about the impact to her)
  • Background information that NICK SAW about the qover
  • Any supposed harassment Nick suffered from Aaron.
It's just such a nothing burger. If the message wasn't sent in a group message and Nick didn't take it, I don't even know they need to call him. But Lord help the State if they do... Actually no, fuck the State. It's a shit law and a shit case to bring forward.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Rodeo Roadrunner powiedział(a):
Nick confirmed that the baseball bat incident happened, but in Nick's version, Aaron had the bat because he was afraid of Nick because Nick is so much taller and stronger. Nick's version was Aaron was a scared pussy bitch that couldn't fight with his fists so he had to get a bat to feel safe around Nick because Nick is such a stud.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's amazing what this noodly-armed scrawny fag thinks people will believe.
 
Desktop User2 powiedział(a):
I dont know... this absolute bullshit is going to trial while Niggieta´s shut and close drug case ended with a plea and probably nothing of substance but some restrictions for a while.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I think Aaron wanted it to go to trial because even if he takes an L he can use it as an opportunity to humiliate Nick or get him to admit to accessing his accounts on the record.

I mean the dude's already made some fucking questionable choices in the past. I think Aaron is playing the long con in hope that he can bring Nick down with him.
 
Sketchy Minecraft Mod powiedział(a):
I think Aaron wanted it to go to trial because even if he takes an L he can use it as an opportunity to humiliate Nick or get him to admit to accessing his accounts on the record.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
That would make them all way stupider than Nick... which was my initial point.
There is no world Nick will testify he accessed his accounts.
 
Desktop User2 powiedział(a):
If you are on trial for a crime of harassment, the stupidest thing one can do on court is to harass a witness going through humiliating particular details. Aaron´s lawyer seems to be pretty shit but that would be a new low.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I hope they do it for our entertainment. I never said it was a good idea.
I want Nick to seethe on the stand.
 
Desktop User2 powiedział(a):
The prosecutor would immediately shut down any question steering away from the case. You people keep forgetting this is not a civil case.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.
 
AnOminous powiedział(a):
Anything reflecting on the credibility of a witness can be used to impeach. Nick is clearly an extremely biased witness who can't be trusted because a) he is a pathological liar; b) he openly detests the defendant; and c) he would benefit from harming the defendant.

The fact that he hates the defendant enough to commit felony level crimes against him clearly reflects on his motive. His testimony derives from his personal animus against the defendant from being his ex-gay lover and cucking him.

That's completely relevant.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Sure and you can establish that by their regular interactions not asking which edible panties were his preferred. The extremely personal questions that were suggested to which I responded to would be tossed and his lawyer would look like an asshole before the jury.

TBF I have no idea why the fuck would he be summoned to testify, maybe the prosecutor is also retarded; unless it was Aaron´s defense idea which would reach even a new level of stupidity.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Desktop User2 powiedział(a):
Sure and you can establish that by their regular interactions not asking which edible panties were his preferred. The extremely personal questions that were suggested to which I responded to would be tossed and his lawyer would look like an asshole before the jury.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Anything he's said in public is fair game. The only issue is whether it's more prejudicial than probative. So maybe some of the more salacious details would be shut down, but not the general existence of the Qover and that Nick rants insanely all day long about the guy swallowing his cum, nor the fact that he's publicly given at least half a dozen different completely contradictory and often unintelligible, incoherent lies about every single event in their shared lives.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole