Unpopular Opinions about Video Games

I kind of dislike when the majority of discussions around modifiable games became more about mods than the base game itself.
It's less that and more that great moddable games are great games that can be built on. Doom, Half-Life, Skyrim, Xcom. Games like Rimworld have no meaningful content in the base game and exist as a platform for mods.

Tax. I mentioned these before but-
nu-devs see tech as something you just slap on and don't need to optimize, so everything is just "meh, it runs".
On the one hand, there's shit made with plug ins that chugs despite being basic. And then there's the other side who expect Starfield to run at 4k ultra 144fps on a 15 year old laptop. When I see people complaining that a SATA (not a SSD, a SATA) hard drive is an unreasonable ask, I have to wonder what is wrong with these people.

I have zero respect for indie developers as a whole since they are only capable of making pixel shit or RTX tech demos.
Because every avenue is closed to them. Pixel art = Shit. Low poly PSX = Shit. Low poly flat = Shit. Stock assets = Shit. Creative workarounds = Good once, then shit.
 
I feel like I'm the only person who thinks Skyrim's gameplay is fucking dogshit. Seriously, I see plenty of comments about how Morrowind's gameplay is bad because a level 1 character with long sword picked as their major can't use an iron dagger to kill a fucking Ordinator. But the paddle spamming of Skyrim is so much better despite the fact that you're really just spamming the same attack over and over until someone falls down. Also, I find it funny that FF13 gets (justifiably) roasted for it's hallway-ass level design, people seem to give Skyrim a pass despite its "dungeons" being hallways that always loop back to the entrance. While I'm bitching about Skyrim...
Most of Morrowind's dungeons aren't any better. Outside of a few you go to during the main quest, they aren't particularly complex or interesting. Hell, Oblivion's are more complex. The only mainline Elder Scrolls games with good dungeon crawling are the first two.
Agree about the mods, but nigger people have been shitting on literally every single thing in skyrim since it came out wtf are you on about? There's just as much hate as there is blind praise.
That's the case for every TES after Morrowind. Bitching about games you have clocked 9000 hours in is practically a requirement if you're a fan of Bethesda games.
 
Most of Morrowind's dungeons aren't any better. Outside of a few you go to during the main quest, they aren't particularly complex or interesting. Hell, Oblivion's are more complex. The only mainline Elder Scrolls games with good dungeon crawling are the first two.
First off, the first two games had dungeons that were procedurally generated and Morrowind's was the start of them being hand crafted. Second, Second, Oblivions dungeons are terrible. If you're seen a Ruin, Forst, Gate, and Cave, you've seen what every single one of them has to offer. Not to mention that the lack of rewards makes it not worth exploring. All of which isn't helped by the lack of teleportation magic. Lastly, Morrowind's dungeons are more reflective of actual places than the precursors to the eventual Skyrim rollercoasters.

but nigger people have been shitting on literally every single thing in skyrim since it came out wtf are you on about?
Yeah, they are... now. After years of Bethesda updates fucking over modders. After the Creation Club made it a nightmare to deal with modding. After burning all their good will. After people went into great details of the failings of Skyrim. After showcasing Elder Scrolls 6 in 2018 and nothing since. After Starfield released, showing how Bethesda can only produce Todd Slop. Yeah, people shit on it now. But that doesn't stop people from putting out defence videos about how Skyrim is actually good. Or the people I run into to this day that still say the "gameplay" is good.

Also, thread tax:
People really only hate Grummz because he's not on "their side" and I know this because someone else will make the exact same point months later to nothing but praise and applause.
Best example: Grummz saying that the Starfield's menu is reflective of bland and insipid UI of modern development. Literally not even a month apart.
1738801124822.png 1738801104424.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
People really only hate Grummz because he's not on "their side" and I know this because someone else will make the exact same point months later to nothing but praise and applause.
Best example: Grummz saying that the Starfield's menu is reflective of bland and insipid UI of modern development. Literally not even a month apart.
This also applies to Asmongold, Rev Says Desu, AVGN, and Side Scrollers. And for non-gaming examples, Elon Musk, Critical Drinker, and RLM.

And then there the opposite. Every trash fire from Concord to Ghostbusters 2016 has a legion of so called "people" praising them not because of their merits, but because it's on "their side".

I would like a derangement syndrome thread, but I haven't got the original sources and linking to drama youtubers resulted in the thread being a complete mess of, well, derangement syndrome.
 
Maybe I'm just shit at it but I find CS:GO/CS:2 pretty boring and full of chess-tier memorization. I want to like it because its a competitive, legendary FPS game but it just doesn't give me any actual enjoyment.
 
Maybe I'm just shit at it but I find CS:GO/CS:2 pretty boring and full of chess-tier memorization. I want to like it because its a competitive, legendary FPS game but it just doesn't give me any actual enjoyment.
Its a bit of both. Pro-tip: Try to use the map to your advantage and walk. You can be creative and stealthily kill your opponents, just don't get greedy.
 
Its a bit of both. Pro-tip: Try to use the map to your advantage and walk. You can be creative and stealthily kill your opponents, just don't get greedy.
I figured that out pretty easily because I've played some of the other CS games a few times, but memorizing smoke grenade spots and training spray patterns? I want to play an FPS not do homework.
 
Sonic 06 was alright and I liked it as a birthday gift way back in the day.
 
They've been hating Skyrim since day one. Before that they hated Oblivion since day one. Internet wasn't what it was when Morrowind came out but I was a Morrowind hater on day one.
I hated Daggerfall on day...okay, it took me a while to figure out that some of those dungeons were nearly endless spiderwebs of repeating corridors.
 
Ironically, EarthBound might be the weakest entry in the trilogy. Zero is more cohesive, 3 doesn’t overstay its welcome and it's a 'movie' you actually want to watch.
This also applies to Asmongold, Rev Says Desu, AVGN, and Side Scrollers. And for non-gaming examples, Elon Musk, Critical Drinker, and RLM.
I'm probably giving people too much credit here but I think we’ve made some progress in this area. Now, it’s all about parasocial relationships with podcasters and pundits, not the random online reviewer who’s just some dude in his basement. No one’s letting Rotten Tomatoes dictate their whole existence anymore, and that’s a W. Of course, we could be swinging a bit too far in the other direction (Miami Vice and Speed Racer are somehow misunderstood masterpieces). Fine, at least those folks are out here marching to the beat of their own drum.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Whenever I hear Rimworld and mods, its almost always a terrible sight. I didn't know a game could even be considered as "worse with mods". Meanwhile I'm in offline CS2, trying to find a way to mod the fucking thing (other than weapon skins, like music kits) and it hurts my soul when a game that was once renowned for being moddable turns into unmoddable trash.
It's less that and more that great moddable games are great games that can be built on. Doom, Half-Life, Skyrim, Xcom. Games like Rimworld have no meaningful content in the base game and exist as a platform for mods.
Rimworld is pretty much more of a mod platform these days than games and I think some mods are improving the gameplay. - but I just don't like how some mods are circlejerked into 'lore' of the game, especially on reddit, where there's an expectation that you must download it if you ever want to ever talk about the game witho 'these people' online, because that's all they're posting about. New players tend to get recommend certain circlejerked mods and end up downloading things that would bloat, confuse and unbalance the game. They'd end up with poorly documented game breaking features (because these people won't read mod descriptions) and a shitload of new items they wouldn't know what to do with.

The 'community' just made my skin crawl for some reason, too, in some way worse than Fallout modders even. (...and Fallout modding scene is a total cesspit, a lot worse than Skyrim. - This is not just my opinions, I know a few people who can say the same)

Anyone who dares to question these circlejerked mods get these same canned aggressive responses from gooners with anime pfp that you should let people enjoys things, it's a single player game!. While big name modders are vaxing about how their mods are better than vanilla games. It's also a game where I see people shamelessly talking about NSFW mods in open in the way other games (that has NSFW mods) don't have. Most people there like to admit that they have thousands of hours in the game which I find pretty weird. It's as if there are barely any casual players left, they wouldn't be posting on reddit...

but maybe it's just reddit. The game itself is a bit bare bones but it's not too bad.... It's becoming like Fallout to me, a game to enjoy privately but the fanbase is cognitohazard.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Why is the gaming industry hoping that AAA games would cost $100 upfront? I know Take Two was the first to charge $70 for AAA games, a SPORTS title no less. The consumer should not have to pay the cost for inflated development costs that they believe is worth the cost of the product. All these microtransactions in games aren't enough?
It has to be a bit more than just greed and the cost of game making (which isn't out fault as customers) but that is what it seems like. Keep in mind that they want $100 standard as in just he video games itself not counting inevitable special, deluxe, ultimate, etc editions for the games.
IMHO, no new game itself is worth $100 alone. When was the last time I've spent more than $30 for a video game? If it's a collector's edition of a game series that I've enjoyed, then MAYBE. But that is just for me.
For me i would count Atomic Heart which i brought at full price when it released but that is it. I cannot fathom anyone even with good income and finances reasoning with themselves that this standard hypothetical video game is worth the price of $100. I see people use the "well back then" argument but people that say this keep forgetting the obvious of how different it is for us now. Even with this argument i still have to say that someone looking at $100 dollar prices tag for a video game would question the hell out of it.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
It has to be a bit more than just greed and the cost of game making (which isn't out fault as customers) but that is what it seems like. Keep in mind that they want $100 standard as in just he video games itself not counting inevitable special, deluxe, ultimate, etc editions for the games.
IMHO, no new game itself is worth $100 alone. When was the last time I've spent more than $30 for a video game? If it's a collector's edition of a game series that I've enjoyed, then MAYBE. But that is just for me.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole