💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Chad Zumock had someone write in (anonymously) as a TM Zumock exclusive about Nick's 4th child testing positive for coke.

Apparently, there were multiple tests that came up positive for the kid, including a blood test. Chad's a dummy and couldn't understand some of the words, including I'm guessing "metabolite". The young girl 100% was taking coke, per the alleged source.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=TfmDQjJVtj0
Supposedly the source of the leak was close to the prosecution.

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

Oh to be inside the cocabunker right now. Nick must be punching himself hard. I would like this to be false for the kid’s sake, but I want Balldo to SUFFAH.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.
But that might be different in Minnesota, I am going by what I remember from youtube videos on plea cases and the states might differ on the topic of allowing felons with adjudicated sentences owning guns.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Chad Zumock had someone write in (anonymously) as a TM Zumock exclusive about Nick's 4th child testing positive for coke.

Apparently, there were multiple tests that came up positive for the kid, including a blood test. Chad's a dummy and couldn't understand some of the words, including I'm guessing "metabolite". The young girl 100% was taking coke, per the alleged source.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=TfmDQjJVtj0
Supposedly the source of the leak was close to the prosecution.

Edit to add: Zumock makes his streams members only after they air, so uh... get on it clippers.

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

4:21

Transcription of the message from his "informant":
(In yellow, Zumock's observations; otherwise, the message he is reading from this informant.)
"So my source talks to this person that's very close to Nick, sent me this and I have it confirmed."
"I have some Rekieta dirt for you. Please, please, never mention my name. I do not want to be on his radar." Here it is. "His daughter tested positive for cocaine more than once. It's not that she had cocaine in her hair. She didn't. And Nick is exploiting that misinformation to claim a cop dusted hair with coke. That is not true. His daughter's hair contained a high level..." what's that word? I don't even know what that is... "that the body produces after consuming cocaine. Nick has lied and said they only tested her once. That is false. The prosecution requested multiple tests, including a blood test. The eight-year-old girl tested positive for cocaine across all tests. Every one of the tests she tested positive. She consumed cocaine." an eight-year-old! "I know I'm just being super..." okay, I can't read that.... "If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution. I've been following Nick for years now..." Can't read that... "He's an absolute monster."

I personally find it hard to believe a blood test would be positive.

(edit: changed the video codec from h.265 to h.264 for mobile users)

 

[Strix454]

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

I'd describe it as a dabbleverse rumor mill. Nick is sinking further into the dabbleverse. Zumock is not remotely reliable. All these dabbleverse people have confidential inside sources and it almost always turns out to be made-up nonsense.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Notice also how the site automatically alters your own posts from the one last bastion that was APA Style Manual 6th Edition backed by science to the utterly benighted barbarism that has been the Chicago Manual (and APA 7th Edition apostasy that I'd just as soon pretend never happened), unless you deploy embedded PNGs to get around it.Wyświetl załącznik 6914113Null does enjoy his petty torments.

I am currently being put through similar plights & torment at work because [the people who get to make the technical rules for formal/official documentation] recommend one space and are currently reviewing a huge document of mine. I pettily hope they miss one.

As for Null and most of the rest, I can only meditate on Luke 23:34. But as for the bastards out of Chicago and their followers, they are Philistines at the gate!

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.

Well, it does can matter in the private sector. MN has some huge companies with thick HR manuals, and though a felony isn't always a bar to hiring, it's certainly not a help. If he were ever to (ha ha ha) try to get back to working for a bank in any capacity*, or (ha ha ha ha x 2) aim to be hired as counsel somewhere, a felony can be an effective DQ.

* depending on role, this may require FBI-level background checks, prints, etc. Often the disclosure question is about arrests/ charges, not just convictions, but obvs no conviction is better.

...Of course that's all irrelevant for no-work-Nick, but for most people a felony conviction - or even arrest/ charge - can have a significant negative impact on their futures and that of their family. As it should. Especially for a man in his 40s and masquerading as an ups anding member is society.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I personally find it hard to believe a blood test would be positive.

According to Doctor Google it only stays in the blood for 1-2 days (maybe longer/shorter for children, I do not know).
So if it was true a blood test was positive, it would mean the child used cocaine within 48 hours of the police searching the house.

I personally do not trust this clown to "verify" anything. The fact that he actually talks about the source being connected to the state is absolutely moronic. That mention alone is enough for Nick to go on a fishing expedition and put in a complaint with the judge about confidential information for a SEALED chips case being leaked by the state or CPS workers.

This clown actually talking about that is beyond me.

"If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution."

LMAO, WHAT?
This smells like a super gay attention seeker spreading bullshit tbh



@Potentially Criminal What is your take on this?

 

[Strix454]

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.
But that might be different in Minnesota, I am going by what I remember from youtube videos on plea cases and the states might differ on the topic of allowing felons with adjudicated sentences owning guns.

I tried to look it up. The federal courts apparently consider for purposes of gun rights that state deferred adjudication is equal to being under indictment for the entire term of deferred adjudication. So apparently in such a situation you at a minimum fail the federal background checks for the purchase of a firearm.
I could not find a definitive answer about ownership of existing guns within the state and under Minnesota state law.

 

[Space Pope]

I could not find a definitive answer about ownership of existing guns within the state and under Minnesota state law.

For the sake of innocent skunks and raccoons, I hope the answer is no.

 

[Melty Butter]

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

HOLY FUCK!!!!!!

THERE IT IS. THERE IT IS. THERE IT IS.

"MORE THAN ONCE"

"BLOOD TESTS"

I've watched enough of Zumock to believe him.

(Also, the informant is clearly Aaron or Keanu. Probably Keanu.)

 

[Vibralldo]

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

(If this is true)

Nick gave it to her 100%

We joke around a lot about lolcows who do horrible shit, but Nick giving his daughter cocaine and then trying to cover it up is arguably one of the worst things a lolcow has ever done and I unironically believe that he should be killed by the government because of it

It's worse than anything Ralph's ever done, it's up there with Nick Bate molesting his sister. Genuinely evil

 

[Harm]

Transcription of the message from his "informant":
(In yellow, Zumock's observations; otherwise, the message he is reading from this informant.)
"So my source talks to this person that's very close to Nick, sent me this and I have it confirmed."
"I have some Rekieta dirt for you. Please, please, never mention my name. I do not want to be on his radar." Here it is. "His daughter tested positive for cocaine more than once. It's not that she had cocaine in her hair. She didn't. And Nick is exploiting that misinformation to claim a cop dusted hair with coke. That is not true. His daughter's hair contained a high level..." what's that word? I don't even know what that is... "that the body produces after consuming cocaine. Nick has lied and said they only tested her once. That is false. The prosecution requested multiple tests, including a blood test. The eight-year-old girl tested positive for cocaine across all tests. Every one of the tests she tested positive. She consumed cocaine." an eight-year-old! "I know I'm just being super..." okay, I can't read that.... "If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution. I've been following Nick for years now..." Can't read that... "He's an absolute monster."

All things considered, I believe it.

The court wouldn't one-and-done a positive drug test for cocaine on a child that young, and even Nick admits that the initial positive test did happen. All Nick has to do to disprove this is unseal the records or produce the sealed records himself (which he won't do because it's all true). It just makes too much sense between him pre-emptively trying to discredit the tests before they were even conducted, to him sealing the record as soon as it became public knowledge what had happened.

The more he works to cover up the facts or spin these bullshit tales about contamination from a cop, the more it becomes clear he poisoned her and almost definitely did so on purpose. I mean, if the tests are as faulty as he says, then why would he also be providing explanations for why it's legitimate with the glove story? It's him hedging all his bets when the truth is he poisoned his young daughter with cocaine.

 

[AnOminous]

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.

If the next post is correct, he doesn't.

While the only gun charge was dropped, it was in there and was concerning enough to be brought in the first place. It might be because he's a habitual drug user, though, if he doesn't clear that up.

So apparently in such a situation you at a minimum fail the federal background checks for the purchase of a firearm.

And he's in big trouble if he commits perjury on Form 4473, which it is to claim you're not a drug user when you are.

Also, as for the other question on 4473.


So considering the indictment is still active and we're in a period between plea and sentencing, he couldn't pass.

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

Aren’t there exemptions to probation drug testing? Correct me if I’m wrong but can’t Nick just convince a psychiatrist he needs methylphenidate, or amphetamine for reasons? And continue his stimulant usage more or less. He’s mentioned modafinil before which is a controlled drug. Why not bump it up to adderall and continue to get high.

Any legitimate doctor would immediately recognize his drug seeking behavior a fucking mile away. He'd have to find some charlatan and he'd still have to notify his probation officer and let them know what he's supposed to be taking. They would start him on a lower dose that he would go through in a couple of days and then have to wait a month to get more.

 

[Axiom.]

First time poster here, I don't know if this if this true, and God I hope not, this was one of the worst things I've ever read from a cow ever. If this true then Nick should fucking kill himself, no fucking child ever should be given drugs and he actually cared about his family once to know this.

 

[victor lasagna]

You guys know that Chad Zumock is a career criminal, most recently charged with dozens of counts of stealing credit cards from old men at gyms, right?

And his last big Dabbleverse scoop was that he was attacked by rapid Cumia fans screaming "This is cumia country" before they beat him to a pulp. And of course, the entire thing was a huge fraud.

It might or might not be true re Nick. Personally I dont think it was an accident. But take Chad with a grain of salt.

 

[Scorpion From MK]

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out?

Clips taken from here.

0:52

49:53-50:45
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "The warrant basically violates all the war rules of warrants"

0:52

1:01:38-1:03:42
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "A corrupt cop wrote a fake warrant"

2:04

17:05-18:17
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "The warrant is effectively perjury which leads into suppression of evidence and an illegal/unlawful search warrant"

2:43

1:40:59-1:43:42
Don't know if this was clipped (I apologize if it has) but Barnes and Viva talked about Rekieta on Jan 20th (this was before Rekieta pled guilty on Jan 24th). Barnes seethes about Nick's "haters" and calls them basement dwellers.

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

Is is just me or is your mp4 file audio only?

 

[Blackhole]

Nick gave it to her 100%

We joke around a lot about lolcows who do horrible shit, but Nick giving his daughter cocaine and then trying to cover it up is arguably one of the worst things a lolcow has ever done and I unironically believe that he should be killed by the government because of it

It's worse than anything Ralph's ever done, it's up there with Nick Bate molesting his sister. Genuinely evil

Since Nick loves Africans so so much, maybe the government should culturally enrich him with a tire filled with gasoline.

Is is just me or is your mp4 file audio only?

I'm also having this issue.

 

[Harm]

You guys know that Chad Zumock is a career criminal, most recently charged with dozens of counts of stealing credit cards from old men at gyms, right?

What you're saying is he's talking from an expert perspective of knowledge and experience as a career criminal. This solidifies for me that Zumock is on the money here. These career criminals despise child abusers and place them at the lowest rungs in prison for a reason; they'd never hesitate to snitch on someone harming children.

There's infinitely more proof that Nick Rekieta poisoned his daughter with cocaine than there is proof that Montagraph is a pedophile, and if Nick feels that's enough proof to say that Montagraph is a pedophile then this is way more than enough to say that Nick poisoned his daughter by his own standards.

 

[RodgerDodger]

So my source talks to this person that's very close to Nick, sent me this and I have it confirmed."

Treat this one with a deep deep skepticism. Leaks regarding CPS Child matters generally don't happen due to how brutally the Family Courts hammer them. If this came from Nick's circle of degenerates than question why he would tell them. And what he's trying to distract from.

If that child had tested that high Nick and Kayla would be facing much much worse prosecution. Their bail would have been revoked. And that child would not be back in that house today.