💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
I'll admit I didn't read the full thing because Nick types like a moderator for r/atheism, but isn't this him explaining in extreme detail exactly what he's been doing to manipulate his audience this whole time?

Dammit Nick, a good magician never reveals his secrets!
Why is he so desperate for people to believe the cum thing?
It is, ironically, a manipulation tactic. You distract your audience with one thing to stop them focusing on all the stuff that makes you look really bad.

Nick does this a lot, the biggest example I can remember is how he would not shut up about probable cause after the Balldo Bunker raid, rather than explain why he had a dealer's worth of coke in his house. Same with focusing on how his kids were not dirty and hungry, instead of explaining why they were in the house while he was having fucked up swinger parties with his zomboid wife and the side piece.
 
Isn't it kind of weird and funny that Aaron never mention's Nick cum, but Nick is completely obsessed with Aaron and his own cum?

Nick is seeming like the most extremely gay person in this situation. He is an extremely angry jilted gay lover.
It´s even weirder because his other BFF Juju, the cow, is also addicted to cummies....

It seems like Nick is displaying his sexual availability to a whole new audience, like a bonobo presenting its ass, but it must be for naught because I imagine the average dabbler never saw a grown woman before; I gather the sexually active ones are more geared towards the younger.
 
Remember when Aaron mentioned naked twister? Nick's way of owning Aaron was to point out that Aaron got an erection during the game.

This own only makes sense to Nick. Everyone else is like "Seems kinda gay to say that..."
In that situation, the one thing keeping nick’s attention was the status of Aaron’s penis.

One of the reasons he imploded was because he was only trying to snatch April to get at Aaron. That’s why he lost his shit when Aaron left
 
Curious to know how many times Nick mentions or hints at Aaron compared to mentioning Kayla or April over the last year of his posts and (ack ack) streams. I'd bet Aaron wins by a landslide.
I think Nick has to hear an Aaron story to cum. I'm sure he just exploded in a heat rash of orgasm when April whispered the cum eating story. He fantasizes about that encounter continuously.

I think it would be just like Nick to need April to whisper Aaron stories during sex and she made up tons of stuff but the cum eating one is his favorite.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I think Nick has to hear an Aaron story to cum. I'm sure he just exploded in a heat rash of orgasm when April whispered the cum eating story. He fantasizes about that encounter continuously.

I think it would be just like Nick to need April to whisper Aaron stories during sex and she made up tons of stuff but the cum eating one is his favorite.
Really makes you wonder how strong Nick's control is over Kayla that she is still married to him, or how the financials are arranged so that she cannot leave him.

Nothing other than coercion makes sense to me. No way on earth a sane person would chose to stick with Nick in his current state. He has completely lost it. Paypigging for pedos and and other retards, while hemorrhaging money to a degree that he could potentially lose their house.
Inconceivable how her family is sitting by idly watching this trainwreck unfold.
 
Really makes you wonder how strong Nick's control is over Kayla that she is still married to him, or how the financials are arranged so that she cannot leave him.

Nothing other than coercion makes sense to me. No way on earth a sane person would chose to stick with Nick in his current state. He has completely lost it. Paypigging for pedos and and other retards, while hemorrhaging money to a degree that he could potentially lose their house.
Inconceivable how her family is sitting by idly watching this trainwreck unfold.
I think the theory Kayla pushed Nick into a life of debauchery is stupid but she did indulge in all of this and, at this point, what would she get out of a divorce? He has no income, a truck load of legal expenses to come (as does she, in a lesser degree because she didn´t call anyone a baby cock sucking pedophile), their only free asset is the cuck shed being sold... I dont know if you can sue the grandparents for pension in the US but that would be her only option.

Also, she cant handle the house and the kids even with Nick´s begrudging help, I cant imagine handling them on her own - it would demand her family to basically do everything.

ETA: it would be pretty funny to see his paintings and dolls auctioned off because of divorce proceedings tho.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Nothing other than coercion makes sense to me.
The other extremely popular theory in the thread is that Kayla is completely lobotomized by pills, though this could still fall under coercion depending on who's making sure she takes them.

From her various court appearances she seems much more lucid than Nick, but I'm not an expert on white collar junkies.
 
Inconceivable how her family is sitting by idly watching this trainwreck unfold.
He'll justify and twist it to them as his great comeback, like, for reals this time and with a 150% guaranteed chance of success with his new dabbleverse fanbase who will lap up his comedy like Aaron does with ballsack juice.
 
I think the theory Kayla pushed Nick into a life of debauchery is stupid but she did indulge in all of this and, at this point, what would she get out of a divorce? He has no income, a truck load of legal expenses to come (as does she, in a lesser degree because she didn´t call anyone a baby cock sucking pedophile), their only free asset is the cuck shed being sold... I dont know if you can sue the grandparents for pension in the US but that would be her only option.

Also, she cant handle the house and the kids even with Nick´s begrudging help, I cant imagine handling them on her own - it would demand her family to basically do everything.

ETA: it would be pretty funny to see his paintings and dolls auctioned off because of divorce proceedings tho.
If they divorce she has a right to expect alimony payments that allow her to keep her standard of living for about the same time as the marriage lasted, minor children can extend this period if she is the primary caregiver and she would be entitled to child support as well.

Of course there are legal ramifications around this, but Nick's previous income would be the foundation for the assessment, and payouts by a trustfund would likely be considered. If the trustfund itself could be legally required to pay her and/or the children is an entirely different matter, but she could pretty much garnish any and all payouts from said trustfund to Nick, and if the payouts were to be suddenly reduced for no discernible reason, I do not think that would go over well with a judge either.

The "standard of living" included a nanny to help with the household, so realistically I do not think Kayla would have to deal with everything on her own. If she wanted, she would have a real possibility of getting out. Before Nick entered her life she seemed to have actual personal ambition, she dropped out and left it behind for Nick. Which might explain her escape into pills, triggered by self-loathing and despair over her life choices.

[EDIT] Divorce law and custody generally favors women, I am not sure how Minnesota law is set up exactly, so her rights might differ a bit from what I am expecting.
 
I think the theory Kayla pushed Nick into a life of debauchery is stupid but she did indulge in all of this and, at this point, what would she get out of a divorce?
I suspect that the time Nick went on Elijah Schaffers show and claimed he blacked out after a night of drinking was him either outright cheating or doing something inappropriate that Kayla found out about, then after that she had her little online Star Trek romance and all of it just led to a tit for tat descent into debauchery.
 
I suspect that the time Nick went on Elijah Schaffers show and claimed he blacked out after a night of drinking was him either outright cheating or doing something inappropriate that Kayla found out about, then after that she had her little online Star Trek romance and all of it just led to a tit for tat descent into debauchery.
You dont become deviant, he just didn´t have the means before. Maybe there was some social trigger to his deviancy but it was all within them.
 
What are the implications of Nick intentionally targeting viewers who enjoy watching pedophiles? Why would he think that's the audience that will enjoy watching him?

It's just so funny and weird!
 
EDIT] Divorce law and custody generally favors women, I am not sure how Minnesota law is set up exactly, so her rights might differ a bit from what I am expecting.
Divorce law and custody doesn't generally favor women, but that aside, MN is very explicitly gender-neutral. It's been discussed many times here and elsewhere. They prefer kids have 50-50 parenting time. Child support is a mixed calculation of income (real and imputable) and parenting time and coverage of insurance. Child support base calculations max out at about $150k income. Base child support in this case at 100% time, with some plug assumptions for healthcare insurance costs, came to around, iirc, $3300/month. Did the most recent numbers itt not that long ago.

As for spousal support, presumption is 0 for under (iirc) 5 years, transitional (1-2 years, time for getting some training) for up to 20 years, and permanent after 20. I don't know the standard of living expectations, but given that though children are supposed to maintain standard of living after divorce and virtually NEVER do (and base support calculation in no way accomplishes that, given how low it can be even when one spouse has kids 100% of time and does not work (like $50/mo)), I am sceptical that that pans out.

Of course all of that is for plebes who earn a living, and hnw folks often litigate above ...though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.
 
Divorce law and custody doesn't generally favor women, but that aside, MN is very explicitly gender-neutral. It's been discussed many times here and elsewhere. They prefer kids have 50-50 parenting time. Child support is a mixed calculation of income (real and imputable) and parenting time and coverage of insurance. Child support base calculations max out at about $150k income. Base child support in this case at 100% time, with some plug assumptions for healthcare insurance costs, came to around, iirc, $3300/month. Did the most recent numbers itt not that long ago.

As for spousal support, presumption is 0 for under (iirc) 5 years, transitional (1-2 years, time for getting some training) for up to 20 years, and permanent after 20. I don't know the standard of living expectations, but given that though children are supposed to maintain standard of living after divorce and virtually NEVER do (and base support calculation in no way accomplishes that, given how low it can be even when one spouse has kids 100% of time and does not work (like $50/mo)), I am sceptical that that pans out.

Of course all of that is for plebes who earn a living, and hnw folks often litigate above ...though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.
No wonder the manosphere doesn't pull up and analyze the actual verbiage of the legislation. They act as if a divorce in year 2 entitles the woman to 1/2 assets and 1/2 income for life. The reality is much more balanced.
 
though it appears that now would be a very bad time (for Kayla) to divorce based on Nick's apparent dearth of earning power.
I think she would be entitled to half of the sale of the main house, if they dissolve the trust that owns it.
And if the trustfund income was used by Nick to pay for general expenses during the marriage it should be included in the income calculations.
If it is capped at 150000$ anyway, I would think the trustfund income alone would get there considering Nick's spending habits.

He is also still a lawyer and can be expected to work in that capacity to earn money.
Money is never easy in a divorce, but given Nick's behavior in the past months and that there appears to be no indicator of him fessing up and admitting his guilt and moving on with his life, but rather a continued attempt to explain away his criminal behavior and degeneracy, I would think it might be a great time for a divorce in terms of custody. Nick is clearly unstable in a very public manner.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole