💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[thebigdream]

Every apology he gives has a ", but" with an excuse.

The best you'll get is "even if something did happen, I've since made it twice as good!"

I've noticed this a lot with how he speaks about his current relationship with his children. He makes constant reference to having patched things up, about their bond being better than ever etc. etc. This seems patently absurd when, even if you believe his ridiculous narrative about what transpired, it's just not possible for their relationship to be fine (and even improved!) after they've just had to live away from home as a direct result of neglect and drug use, and having experienced a literal police raid on their home. There's no acknowledgement of even the possibility that they're hurting, or that they could be experiencing mistrust, just that he has apparently fixed everything with his magic words.

Exhibit A

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Sequel to The Journey of Sir Balldolot, and the final installment in my medieval Lord Balldo trilogy.

Outstanding. Using @Potentially Criminal 's uncut voice when he whined about not being in the other one is awesome. Also, him taking downs Barnes and Frey - chef's kiss. Macbeth as a movie choice and the music was excellent.

 

[Iron Hamster]

Kino Casino is back covering Rekieta (give it 3 hours before they get around to it) for those interested.
Wyświetl załącznik 6821760


Agree, but he's leaning in:

Wyświetl załącznik 6821736
I regard narcissism as a spectrum issue. That is, it CAN be treated and mitigated over time. From what I understand, the psychological community is split on the matter. At the very least, Nick will performatively try to take accountability.

Is 'JF' the Canadian killer?

 

[AnOminous]

I've noticed this a lot with how he speaks about his current relationship with his children. He makes constant reference to having patched things up, about their bond being better than ever etc. etc. This seems patently absurd when, even if you believe his ridiculous narrative about what transpired, it's just not possible for their relationship to be fine (and even improved!) after they've just had to live away from home as a direct result of neglect and drug use, and having experienced a literal police raid on their home. There's no acknowledgement of even the possibility that they're hurting, or that they could be experiencing mistrust, just that he has apparently fixed everything with his magic words.

As with anything this piece of absolute garbage says, you can assume anything he says is diametrically opposite to the truth.

If he says they're on great terms, they all view him as an absolute piece of shit. Which he is.

There's no acknowledgement of even the possibility that they're hurting, or that they could be experiencing mistrust, just that he has apparently fixed everything with his magic words.

Never mind that even still calling himself "Rekieta Law" is a lie, and maybe even fraud.

He isn't a lawyer any more. He isn't anything. He's just a faggot.

He should be forced, legally, to rename his account "Rekieta Unauthorized to Practice Law" because he is no longer a lawyer. He is just an utter faggot.

He is also probably on thin ice if he streams again with his usual "small law firm" bullshit, because his "law firm" is no longer a "law firm" since a non-lawyer, which Nick is, is not allowed to control a law firm. It's actually a crime if Nick holds himself out as a lawyer who could practice law at this point.

He's just a faggot, with no license to practice law, and all he can do is talk shit, and that's what it is, pure shit.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Every sad-sack mediocre salesman PRAYS for a cuck like Nick to walk in. He’s exactly the kind of moron who will believe that because he’s paying a lot of money for something it means it’s betterer.

For all his family’s oil money, they are textbook nouveau riche retards.

Totally agree. And it may be small and petty of me, but this is one of the things that most irritates me about him.

Kino Casino is back covering Rekieta (give it 3 hours before they get around to it) for those interested.
Wyświetl załącznik 6821760


Agree, but he's leaning in:

Wyświetl załącznik 6821736
I regard narcissism as a spectrum issue. That is, it CAN be treated and mitigated over time. From what I understand, the psychological community is split on the matter. At the very least, Nick will performatively try to take accountability.

Performatively taking accountability means he internally does not believe he did anything wrong, therefore, he's not going to modify his future behavior.

I've personally never seen effective treatment for this condition because I've never known one who acknowledged that their behavior was destructive. Nick does not have the capacity to go back from this. At his height, he was living a lie to get attention and got bored with it because narcs often seem to become dopamine addicts sooner or later. He finally succumbed to the narc thought pattern that any attention is good attention, and negative attention requires much less effort to get than positive attention.

I commented about narc rehabilitative prospects in the Russell Greer thread earlier today.

Definitely there is a spectrum of narcissistic tendencies all the way to clinical narcissism, and then there are gradations of clinical narcissists.

Personally, I think Nick is clinically a narcissist. Mid/moderate-level.

Clinical narcs can learn, if they choose (lol, don't trust it), to mimic normal human perspectives. This requires acknowledging that their deepest views are wrong thwarting their goals, and doing things they don't believe are correct bc they intellectually understand that their natural perspective is fucked up and causes harm to themselves (and others but that's not among their natural concerns) - & that their life is better by behaving differently.

Very rare, usually only occurs after they are dramatically humiliated and humbled, in danger of losing everything...if ever. To sustain the imitation, they will have to constantly rely on someone to tell them what to do and to practice making non-intutive non-harmful choices. They are still a narc, and they will never have a solid moral compass, but they can work on taking action to override their natural drive. Very few ever even attempt it (though many fake it/perform it very short-term).

 

[Peace Through Power]

Here is a bit of a distraction.

0:05

Posted by Bob Rekieta on his Youtube channel a week before christmas.
Titled: "Raccoons hanging out"
I hope it's not Nick's yard

 

[Swole McPole]

Clinical narcs can learn, if they choose (lol, don't trust it), to mimic normal human perspectives.

I knew two sisters. Both were serious narcissists. Both had BPD. The older of the two had the more severe manifestation. She ended up serving a long prison sentence because she set one of her neighbours houses on fire. Neighbour was an old lady. She didn't die, but she did suffer serious smoke inhalation and probably had her life shortened. After they arrested her, they found a pattern of arson that followed her around. They'd never noticed it until they jailed her for trying to kill her neighbour.

The younger sister was terrified of her. I didn't even know she had an older sister until she told me she was being released from prison. She was able to manage her issues sufficiently that she didn't go around burning people's houses down while they were asleep in bed, but she wasn't able to sustain relationships at all. It was really kind of sad, because she was very funny, could be kind, charming and was highly intelligent, but when her insecurities struck her, she was completely insufferable. I cut her out of my life multiple times, and she'd work on behaving like a normal human for a while, and win me over again. Ultimately though, she had to go. Like her older sister, every problem was always caused by somebody else, She never did anything wrong. But she'd get hysterically angry with people over things that seemed utterly trivial -- perhaps even non-existant. But they were always about percieved slights of some kind.

I always assumed it had something to do with their upbringing. I'm pretty sure they were raised by their mother and she was cut from the same cloth. The youngest daughter -- who was in and out of my life for about ten years -- never really talked about her at all. She left the family home at 17 or 18 and never went back again.

 

[Waldo Geraldo Balldo]

My thoughts exactly.

---

Wyświetl załącznik 6819341
Wyświetl załącznik 6819340
This caught my eye (from the chats just posted from the memorial stream last page) because he finally said his show was shitty. Too little too late, but be sure that Cuck will claim this throwaway line as some form of accountability at a later date.

The funnier stuff is him talking about “plugging holes in his back office work.” He means his family life. Not the majority of ex-peers he was just on stream with for the first time in a year+, they don’t affect him at all. It was the family that got to him, that he hated. “That damn back office work made Nick a druggie drunkard & made him do a shitty show.”

Just because, what the fuck else could the illusive back office work be? Remember it’s hole plugging back office work, too.

Is it fair to assume Nick was also hoping Aaron would be plugging holes in his "back office work"?

 

[Boingboingboingboi]

Agree, but he's leaning in:

Wyświetl załącznik 6821736
I regard narcissism as a spectrum issue. That is, it CAN be treated and mitigated over time. From what I understand, the psychological community is split on the matter. At the very least, Nick will performatively try to take accountability.

"I'm sorry you feel that way".
"You would have done the same thing if you were in my shoes"
"My goals are actually noble, but I'm a victim of circumstance."

he is still in the deepest denial of any unrepentant addict. i don't see any corner having been turned. this is not the start of a redemption arc. this is a PR stunt.

 

[A Very Big Fish]

Is 'JF' the Canadian killer?

He mashed the Potato.

 

[daniel day]

Last night proved to me that Nick will have a medium-successful comeback. This is a counter view to many people here who enjoy the "it's never been so over' refrain. That's a fine perspective, and often funny. I just don't think it's accurate.

The instinctive love for him from a few dozen people last night was unsurprising.

I'm not going to write a long defense of my view bc time will prove the answer but the short argument:

• No one ever gets canceled unless they cancel themselves
• Americans love a comeback
• Nick has among the most loyal fanbases around. His Locals subs proved it. Many will be back.
• The political mood supports it. See Trump's comeback. Like Trump, Nick is something of a trustfund populist that people love despite their better instincts.
• Nick's always possessed self-deprecating humor (that hides a gigantic ego until it doesn't). That serves a comeback mission well.
• Nick's not Ralph despite the many parallels.

Instead of Ralph, a more accurate parallel might be Destiny. Besides looks, they share a fiercely loyal fanbase, edgelord history (sort of), sexual scandals, sexual orientation issues, and known drug abuse. (I'd also argue that they both hate women but that's another issue.)

Destiny rides out his scandals with honesty about his vices and a good work ethic. Nick can easily achieve the former. It's the latter that's in question.

nick isnt particularly funny, interesting, well educated, intelligent, or experienced enough to outperform all the other law channels, that dont have the massive scandals attached to their name. He only got so big by complete luck. 2 once-in-a-generation cases back to back, prior to lawtube being founded as it is now, with dozens of different lawyers on as guests. Even if you dont follow or have even heard about his drama (unlikely if you follow other lawtubers, and if you havent then you probably just followed him for those few interesting cases anyway), Nick doesnt offer anything unique or interesting that other lawtubers dont already do.

IF he comes back to streaming, itll be to a dwindling locals audience that cant expand because if he streams on an unmoderated platform he'll get completely fucking toasted. People really hate child abusers, even the vaguest hint that you are one is a stink that never goes away and fills a whole room with ease. Nick isnt going to be allowed to the party anywhere else either. Anyone that would have been on his side with an audience, he alienated by being a complete retard and by not shutting up when he got arrested.

 

[AnOminous]

"I'm sorry you feel that way".

Or in Nick's case, "I'm sorry you MADE me do what I did." Pure narc shit. He should be put against a wall.

 

[Strix454]

Is it fair to assume Nick was also hoping Aaron would be plugging holes in his "back office work"?

I'm almost certain Nick had dreams of Aaron one day being his (bankrupt) houseboy living in his second house and plugging his holes all day long.

 

[SanicBlackMagic]

What I want to know is what he is using to drive the a18s. I highly doubt it is sufficient enough, or anywhere close to revealing how good those IEMs are. That level of IEMs you need a very nice DAC/AMP setup to take advantage of the detail. He probably just has them plugged into his audio mixer or something, they should really have a dedicated setup.

The impedance of the a18s is 8 ohms so he can drive them with just about anything, but you're right. Unless he's got a quality DAC and lossless recordings in FLAC, ALAC or WAV formats he wont really be utilizing them to their full extent.

That being said, im sure with 18 fucking drivers they sound REAL nice. Makes me wonder if anyone has had the idea to make a similar headset with independent drives and control over each one so that you can tweak the response and level of each 'speaker' to taste.

Anyway, audiosperging aside, he's still a retard and I'm looking forward to buying those a18s at the inevitable bankruptcy auction for a fraction of the price.

 

[Red Frida]

well well well... Wyświetl załącznik 6820619

What was the context of his kiwifags quip?

 

[Grayback]

I'm intrigued by the psychological dynamics at play when content creators experience a public downward spiral, yet maintain a devoted following despite clear misconduct.
What cognitive mechanisms enable such steadfast loyalty in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary?
Does this phenomenon have a name?

It basically always comes from ignorance, largely just out of happenstance.

Spoiler: all the ways that people miss stuff

- People don't follow a creator closely enough (they don't watch that regularly, just listen in the background, etc.), so they don't notice the creator's changes in behavior.

- People just aren't that invested and they just don't care that much about this online stuff, so they can't be bothered to investigate anything that gets said about a creator beyond what they can see for themselves. If it doesn't come up obviously in the show, then it doesn't exist, and they've already forgotten what was alleged.

- People don't have any experience in their own lives with alcoholics or drug addicts, so they aren't able to recognize what's going on with the creator.

- People don't follow the creator on other sites, and/or they don't follow adjacent communities online, so they don't ever hear about news or rumors related to the creator.

- People can't reconcile a rumor that they hear with all that they've seen from the creator over the years and all that they think they know about the guy—and since the rumor is just a sliver of information compared to everything that they've seen from watching the creator, they just dismiss the rumor (it must just be another creator's jealousy, slander, shitposting, etc.), and they don't look into it any further.

- People dismiss issues that come up with a creator over a long period of time, one by one, thinking that each of them is just an unsubstantiated rumor, a one-off thing, or a minor quirk where, sure, it's weird (like the bottle-sniffing), but you can look past it—so they just don't notice the overall pattern that well, since half of the evidence for it is stuff that wasn't sufficiently proven at the time and got filed away in their mind as "excused." The more slowly a person encounters bits of evidence and excuses them one-by-one, the more any new piece of evidence will seem like "just another attack against this poor guy whom people are always persecuting."

- Some people are just too nice and guileless, so much so that they can't even imagine some of the stuff that's being accused, and they just don't want to believe that a creator could be as bad as people say—so they reject the rumors out of hand, they listen to the creator when he denies it because they want to believe that version of reality, and they don't double-check any of it.

I know that "mental illness" and "retardation" are the fun meme answers, but I think that, for the overwhelming majority of stragglers in an audience like Nick's, they just haven't yet noticed or understood the stuff that people like us know about. Whatever it was that finally pushed you over the edge, they just haven't come across that stuff yet.

Sure, there are the "sunk cost" people in an audience who have just invested too much in a creator, either emotionally or through superchats, to ever believe what's being alleged—but I don't think that this can account for that much of Nick's remaining audience. Superchat whales are rare, and so are insane people who will outright deny reality even when they're forced to confront it.

Even for the people who have just been drip-fed rumors and are primed to disbelieve them now, or for the nice soccer moms who have never even seen drugs in their life and can't imagine that a good Christian man would bring them into his family's home, *gasp*, I think that even they could be convinced if you just sat them down and showed them enough evidence. It's not impossible for them to come around. But it would take a long fucking time, if it ever happens. Most people are normies, perfectly content to never look into any of this shit.

 

[AltisticRight]

>Sniffs a line of coke

>a line

Is 'JF' the Canadian killer?

Yeah, the one that killed his wife (allegedly).

Posted by Bob Rekieta on his Youtube channel a week before christmas.
Titled: "Raccoons hanging out"
I hope it's not Nick's yard

It seems like his parents like wildlife while their psychopathic son tortures them for his own gratification.

 

[Dr. Jaime Reyes]

Smile, laugh, and learn more about yourself.
Archive
Wyświetl załącznik 6818304

“I’m sorry, Mister Rekieta, but the terms of the loan are very clear.”

 

[anionfarflung]

Sequel to The Journey of Sir Balldolot, and the final installment in my medieval Lord Balldo trilogy.

Just about every time Camelot sang "bye" I was dying.
Thanks for the cameo!

 

[AnOminous]

What was the context of his kiwifags quip?

He was gloating about how he was totally getting another gorillion dollars when his Rumble deal got renewed, while we were dumbly saying that obviously it wasn't going to get renewed.

(It didn't get renewed.)

It's basically emblematic of the Retardkieta policy of prematurely and smugly gloating about future victories he's absolutely certain about, which Kiwis point out are obviously not going to happen, then he gets curbstomped by reality (while smugly and skeletally eating a single Dorito).