💰 Grifter Sam Hyde / Samuel Whitcomb Hyde / Million Dollar Extreme (MDE) / COM98 / 1Team / HydeWars / alienmode / @wigger / 'The Candyman' - Millennial anti-humorist, Carnegie Mellon University art student, 'World Peace' writer and creator, born-again Christian and groyper convert. The Marky Post to End All Marky Posts.

I think the best solution is to have a revised and codified OP where it just spills the guts on this, and just has everything. The same topic gets talked about and people either believe the allegations or not, and the litigation gets tiring and pointless.

My suggestion would be perhaps a Prospering Grounds thread (senior members let me know if this is a good idea or not), for this sole purpose, with links, archives and info-graphs. I think fighting each other and speculations are just meaningless. After satisfaction of all the allegations and information, it can perhaps be put here or replace the OP.
I'm working on it. DM me if anyone wants to help. Also, please don't use private tags for anything except NSFW and dox on the first page.
 
"wuh bluh but N-Null said-" god your mind is terminally brainrotted from e-daddy worship to the point you are completely unable to have your own opinions and actually think "but my other e-daddy said it's okay!" is a valid argument. Stop projecting your lust for Null's cock in your ass on me, retard.
Why the fuck would she want to come out and face the thousands of Sam Hyde fanboys who would call her a lying whore and try to ruin her life? She knows it's in her best interest to stay gone because nothing will happen to Sam either way, people will always side with him and it can only end badly for her.
lolcalmdown.gif
You should really log the fuck off tbh
 
It's so dangerous to take a stand against Sam Hyde that Channing had no problem physically showing up to one of his shows to harass him and nearly get him arrested.
 
"wuh bluh but N-Null said-" god your mind is terminally brainrotted from e-daddy worship to the point you are completely unable to have your own opinions and actually think "but my other e-daddy said it's okay!" is a valid argument. Stop projecting your lust for Null's cock in your ass on me, retard.
GdqZQLlW8AAVSDz.jpg
You of all people don't get to say that. Shut up.
 
Something I forgot to mention is when Sam, talks about how seeing people as their economic output is Communism? I've literally said the same thing in regards to euthanasia on this very site!
Honestly, this whole argument in favor of euthanasia can be summed up in one word: Soviet. "You are a burden to the State, comrade. Ergo, you can not be permitted to live."
Maybe I should just record myself coughing into a microphone and people will listen.
 
Can someone explain to me why it's such a big ask for Marky to tell her side of the story? This isn't even "listen and believe women" anymore. It's listen and believe other people who have decided that they have been deputized to speak on behalf of a woman.
Why the fuck would she want to come out and face the thousands of Sam Hyde fanboys who would call her a lying whore and try to ruin her life? She knows it's in her best interest to stay gone because nothing will happen to Sam either way, people will always side with him and it can only end badly for her.
This goes the other way around too, if it's not true why does Sam go out of his way to avoid addressing it or making sure it's not brought up? He could just deny it.

Sam Hyde gets a pass because he's a comedian who deliberately creates confusion about what he does and believes. I'm not sure whether the latest video really is a trial balloon for becoming an edgier version of a Crowder type guy or not but if he really does try to pivot into a more serious and mainstream "RW political commentator who makes jokes" role he's going to have to have a better response than saying nothing and hoping it never gets brought up because he will piss people off and someone prominent will hear about it and bring it up to a wide audience.

Discussing Sam Hyde in the Sam Hyde thread isn't derailment but your impotent seething about me discussing Sam Hyde in the Sam Hyde thread sure is.
That's the name of the game though. Immediately pounce on any posts containing substantive critiques of $EDADDY in the hopes that the only discussion in the $EDADDY thread is advertising the latest content of $EDADDY or wishing $EDADDY a happy birthday or holidays, etc. We are now at the point in the cycle where people demand that substantive but negative discussion of $EDADDY be banned.
 
That's the name of the game though. Immediately pounce on any posts containing substantive critiques of $EDADDY in the hopes that the only discussion in the $EDADDY thread is advertising the latest content of $EDADDY or wishing $EDADDY a happy birthday or holidays, etc. We are now at the point in the cycle where people demand that substantive but negative discussion of $EDADDY be banned.
Imo it's simply because the discussion has already been had in this thread a dozen different times. Lidl adds nothing new to the argument, just more sperging and baby raging at anyone that dares disagree with her.

It's incredibly tiring that the same autistic thread meltdown happens every single fucking time this thread gets featured.
 
This goes the other way around too, if it's not true why does Sam go out of his way to avoid addressing it or making sure it's not brought up? He could just deny it.
No, it doesn't. If you accuse someone else of wrong doing, the burden of proof is on you. Unlike Marky, Sam addressing an allegation like that actually is a lose lose because it would cause people to start speculating again, which is bad for him even if he's innocent.

That's the name of the game though. Immediately pounce on any posts containing substantive critiques of $EDADDY in the hopes that the only discussion in the $EDADDY thread is advertising the latest content of $EDADDY or wishing $EDADDY a happy birthday or holidays, etc. We are now at the point in the cycle where people demand that substantive but negative discussion of $EDADDY be banned.
There isn't any substantive evidence though. A picture and some screenshots of Facebook messages amounts to basically nothing.
 
Imo it's simply because the discussion has already been had in this thread a dozen different times. Lidl adds nothing new to the argument, just more sperging and baby raging at anyone that dares disagree with her.

It's incredibly tiring that the same autistic thread meltdown happens every single fucking time this thread gets featured.
That illustrates the whole point though. Once Sam moves out of his hugbox filled with people who think he's THE Internet legend he has to deal with a more varied audience, a large portion of which will consist of people who like some or most of his recent or past work but still find the Marky situation extremely hard or impossible to move past if and when they hear it. He's still getting off easier than anyone else would in a similar situation
 
That illustrates the whole point though. Once Sam moves out of his hugbox filled with people who think he's THE Internet legend he has to deal with a more varied audience, a large portion of which will consist of people who like some or most of his recent or past work but still find the Marky situation extremely hard or impossible to move past if and when they hear it. He's still getting off easier than anyone else would in a similar situation
Did you mean to reply to the other guy? I'm just talking about the state of the threadly meltdown and why everyone here finds users like Lidl annoying.
 
I thought we all agreed that ignoring baseless bullshit is actually the smart thing to do for the accused
You are innocent until proven guilty. So far the proof has been insubstantial to the point that nothing has happened to Sam. Just gotta ask the obvious questions, why ain't he in jail? Is the funny man that shit talked Elon Musk really that slick? IDK, but channing really didn't help showing up to her interview plastered
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole