Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[BoomerPrime]

Honestly, I just want this lawsuit to end so Null can move onto suing that uggo tranny from Harvard with the shit haircut. Until then, all these hilarious filings are going to be very bittersweet.

Bruh, you're gonna have to be more specific.

Obviously kidding, but you're right. This debacle, while hilarious, is a waste of time and money that could be directed at other more serious threats to the Farms.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

I'm well aware of the Melinda Scott saga. I'm just optimistic about this one. It may be the holiday season effect. I deserve all the .

Pour one out for our poor @Deadpool
He was really mean to Melly and she did not like him and said YHWH struck him down.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

until we got a retard who let something slip.

It was literally the same judge all six times

and now has a preliminary injunction (I think that's the right term) where she now cannot sue Null for anything related to KF without going before a judge first.

Permanant injunction, yeah, and you can view it here:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vawd.119463/gov.uscourts.vawd.119463.142.0.pdf

 

[WelperHelper99]

Wyświetl załącznik 6790107

Thanks for confirming and admitting to willfully disobeying the courts order to disclose in an official filing in a timely manner.

I got to ask, at this point, what does Kiwi Farms do to you Greer? Watch and comment? Eat popcorn at your hooker shenanigans?

 

[Bogliacci]

I got to ask, at this point, what does Kiwi Farms do to you Greer? Watch and comment? Eat popcorn at your hooker shenanigans?

His evidence is so numerous that he can't actually provide it. Enjoy sanctions, hardship.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

I got to ask, at this point, what does Kiwi Farms do to you Greer? Watch and comment? Eat popcorn at your hooker shenanigans?

KF is the clown from your nightmares. The scarecrow from the horror story you were told as a child. The man that looked at you funny while passing you on the street.

It does nothing, and in doing nothing, it terrifies you. It becomes a placeholders for all of your fears. It becomes a receptacle for the blame of all the things you did wrong.

 

[WelperHelper99]

KF is the clown from your nightmares. The scarecrow from the horror story you were told as a child. The man that looked at you funny while passing you on the street.

It does nothing, and in doing nothing, it terrifies you. It becomes a placeholders for all of your fears. It becomes a receptacle for the blame of all the things you did wrong.

Actually though. In reality we're the two old men from the Muppets. Seriously Russ, just don't look at the internet and you'll be fine honestly

 

[Bogliacci]

The reality is of course that it's a convenient collection of all of Russell's retardation that he cant tilt at. Everything about him is spread over the internet in news articles and videos and legal filings, but here it has all been collated and he thinks the world will be his oyster if the kiwifarms hardship was out of the way.

 

[goblin enby]

Meanwhile in ECF 203 EXHIBIT B filed by Mr Greer...

These two unhinged filings are a Christmas miracle. Most of the "justifications" for his behaviour have already been covered as insufficient, inaccurate and/or lies in Hardin's original motions. It's especially funny how he's relying on claiming there was only one request to meet and confer that he "saw" when, again, Hardin already filed multiple exhibits showing the numerous times he attempted to arrange it without response.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Meanwhile in ECF 203 EXHIBIT B filed by Mr Greer...

He is showing Mr. Hardin's exhibit to substantiate his claim.

 

[East_Clintwood]

I didn't disclose the witnesses that I chose, in the case I filed, because I don't want to drag the witnesses I chose, into the case I filed.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Man does Russ'tard cling to that 10th circuit ruling.

Russ, they only said that you might possibly have a case and that it would have to be adjudicated. Not that you won, not that your case has merits, not that you've been harassed or anything even close to what your claiming.

The 10th circuit only said that you can present your case for contributory infringement against Josh Moon, that's it.

 

[goblin enby]

He is showing Mr. Hardin's exhibit to substantiate his claim.

Can he not redact the information himself in that situation and simply reference the previous ECF numbers to substantiate that Hardin's versions weren't redacted? It seems strange that someone would have to effectively re-publish the same private information themselves over again if it genuinely was a violation. Obviously I'm not a lawyer but this seems weird to me.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Kiwifarms is the hardship because if you google this regard’s name it shows up.

That’s it. That’s the sum and totality of it all.

 

[Moths]

Wyświetl załącznik 6790117

This made me lol

Kiwifarms is the Hardinship

I see his new tactic is to try to use his pro se leeway to accuse hardin of knowingly violating the protective order because russel was too retarded to activate it. Lol and lmao.

Maybe he should watch some of the judges litigation for retards videos.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Can the court itself call and deposition witnesses?

They may have to to ascertain the truths of this filing.

Also this nigger claims to be a paralegal but hasn’t even read the first paragraph of the Wikipedia article for deposition or discovery.

Let alone spent an hour reading a Nolo book.

 

[obsdj]

Wyświetl załącznik 6790403
I didn't disclose the witnesses that I chose, in the case I filed, because I don't want to drag the witnesses I chose, into the case I filed.

He keeps making this claim (that his non-disclosure was justified) AFTER the judge has explicitly stated that his non-disclosure was NOT justified, and that in fact it was recalcitrant and willful, and that Greer has to show cause for why he should not be sanctioned for his UNjustified non-disclosure.

Judge: "Your non-disclosure is not justified. Why shouldn't I sanction you?"

Greer: "ACKCHUALLY it WAS justified because I said so. Sanction the other guy."

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can he not redact the information himself in that situation and simply reference the previous ECF numbers to substantiate that Hardin's versions weren't redacted? It seems strange that someone would have to effectively re-publish the same private information themselves over again if it genuinely was a violation. Obviously I'm not a lawyer but this seems weird to me.

I will not opine to great detail on the matter, but yes, he could have chosen better ways to do it

 

[obsdj]

I will not opine to great detail on the matter, but yes, he could have chosen better ways to do it

Indeed, he could have avoided the whole issue in the first place by simply following the (very! simple!) rules laid out in the protective order itself.

 

[Moths]

Indeed, he could have avoided the whole issue in the first place by simply following the (very! simple!) rules laid out in the protective order itself.

Reading is for lawyers and lurkers. Not Russtard and posters.