Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
His family now won't have to be interrogated about shit they have no knowledge about, saving them and Russ a great deal of embarrassment when he's already on thin ice with the court. AFAIA they're still expecting an explanation for his timewasting, otherwise he's due a hefty fine and/or dismissal.
Remember the whole basis for transferring this back (completely against the rules) to Utah was Russhole's lies about imaginary witnesses, which this idiot judge totally bought.

How many of these witnesses are there that were totally being inconvenienced? Literally fucking none. This clown of a judge has egg on face for buying this bullshit.

How embarrassing!
 
The Grande case didn't take over 4 years. This one should be big, and a lesson going forward.
It cost Null and his counsel a ton of money and way too much time and the only way Russell will learn is with a stiff penalty, deservedly so.
$80085
 
I think Null has said how much Hardin charges per hour, I wanna say like $300.
He's said on MATI approximately how much overall he'd been billed so far a few months back, and with how many hours of work Hardin has to have already devoted, there's no way he's charging that much an hour. Can't remember precisely what he'd said, so I won't throw any specific numbers. Maybe someone with a better memory will recall which MATI it was or how much he'd said.

I remember it being a very reasonable amount considering how long the case has been ongoing.
 
The Grande case didn't take over 4 years. This one should be big, and a lesson going forward.
It cost Null and his counsel a ton of money and way too much time and the only Russell will learn is with a stiff penalty, deservedly so.
$80085

Not just that, but the nominal damages need to be huge so that everyone else badmouthing the Farms takes notice.

Liz Fong-Jones repeatedly brings up that Australian case he won by the other side never showing up, and claims it's somehow "proof" of the Farms being bad. Nobody ever checks the facts of the case, but he has his headline number and posts it everywhere. Null needs to do the same, posting as big a sanction as possible, even if Russ only pays him back $5.
 
As far as I can tell, Hardin entered the case on November 1st 2023. There have been 151 docket entries since then. I'm not counting how many were filed by Hardin because I haven't any access to most of them and I have very limited knowledge on how this is done. But there is no way it's only been five hours especially with all the e-mail communication with Greer over the last almost 14 months he's been on the case. Plus all the times he's had to file and I assume pay to file.
Definitely not five hours for the whole case. Just that dealing with Greer's witness bullshit that the judge could award Null/Hardin due to Greer's delays and refusals to answer basic questions.
 
Not just that, but the nominal damages need to be huge so that everyone else badmouthing the Farms takes notice.

Liz Fong-Jones repeatedly brings up that Australian case he won by the other side never showing up, and claims it's somehow "proof" of the Farms being bad. Nobody ever checks the facts of the case, but he has his headline number and posts it everywhere. Null needs to do the same, posting as big a sanction as possible, even if Russ only pays him back $5.

Meh. I don't think Josh successfully defending himself from a literal retard really shows anything beyond his willingness to defend himself if sued. Obviously if he lost it would probably be the end of the farms because every cow would sue him, but I think winning basically just puts him in the position he was before he was sued.
 
Meh. I don't think Josh successfully defending himself from a literal retard really shows anything beyond his willingness to defend himself if sued. Obviously if he lost it would probably be the end of the farms because every cow would sue him, but I think winning basically just puts him in the position he was before he was sued.
He got costs against Melissa Scott, he's probably going to get costs against Russ, and hopefully he'll get something against Acerthorn whenever that finally gets moving. He gets threats and C&D's all the time, which is when he can shut down new lawsuits. It is well worth being able to tell retards "look I've forced 3 people who sued me to pay me money, you really want to become #4?"
 
How has Russel actually signed a piece of paper that say's he's not a witness in his own copyright explain to me
Kind of like this, but larger, with less strokes. Hope this helps :)

Greersigned.png
 
It's been said before ITT, but his view of what Hardin's role is supposed to be really does reveal that, despite claiming a paralegal degree, he views the legal system as the public school system he's supposed to run and tattle to in order to force the other kid to be nice to him.

Just out of curiosity could Hardin request a competency hearing for Greer to see if he's fit to stand at trial? Even if he could, I don't think any judge would grant such a request, as much as they might think Russ may deserve it.

So that was all just a giant waste of time, court resources, and $84?

Seems rather like a microcosm of the entire lawsuit.

Doesnt this mean that he cant even testify on his own suit?

I think that actually plays in Greer's favor.

I apologize if this is a stupid question, but why is the withdrawn subpoena a mercy for Russell?

Hardin deposing Russ or any of his family members would create a lot of milk. Even if Hardin wasn't trying to be the vindictive prick that he has every right to be at this point, Greer would be a total sperg at his deposition and his brother or father might reveal embarassing details or stories about Russ that we haven't heard before.
 
Just out of curiosity could Hardin request a competency hearing for Greer to see if he's fit to stand at trial? Even if he could, I don't think any judge would grant such a request, as much as they might think Russ may deserve it.
Russ(tard) is not standing trial, but pressing the trial. He can walk away at anytime he wants, unlike a defendant who is at the mercy of the plaintiff and the court. Someone here might be able to pull caselaw where this has come up as far as being "fit" to pursue trial. Usually mental health/state within a lawsuit context is used for things like personal injury to show anguish etc.

This would not factor into a copyright lawsuit, nor needed to assess damages for said copyright.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole