Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
If the judge does not impose some form of sanctions at this point I will be actually MATI.
I think we've reached the point where it would be reversible error not to take some action at this point.

The Judge however may give Hardin a stern talking to for not acting as Russ's lawyer too, and failing to correct that he neglected to label his witness list as Confidential as required by the courts standard order.

But here's the even more hilarious thing. In order for Russ to make any arguments about Hardin publishing the phone numbers (which he, Russel caused) and his family getting harassed, he will have to present his witnesses to give testimony to such. And to be deposed by the Defendants. Russ simply claiming something is not good enough. Especially when he claims to not have known his brothers address.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out with the order to show cause. The Judge appears to have set a trap for Russel. One which Hardin seems to have recognized and has played into. He's dotting his it's crossing his T's and making sure to remind the Judge in every filing what the escalating problems are.

And Russel has fallen into the Judge's trap as only a cow can.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6770141

MATT HARDIN!
MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE!

MATT HARDIN!
LAWYER IN DISGUISE!
I can no longer maintain my dignified silence on this matter and must speak the truth.

The man who is known to these forums as Hardin is in fact a pokémon of the Hādin species - a hare-like creature who the defendant in this case, Joshua Lake Superior Moon, captured while holidaying in Japan. Moon has been covertly training his Hādin by pitting it against pokémon that he orders from wish.com. Because pokémon fighting is illegal in the U.S. these battles are commonly framed as legal trials. In a recent Newsweek article it was estimated that 80% of all court cases in the Untied States are really underground pokémon fights.

Naturally, as seasoned competitor, Moon's Hādin has a evolved a set of abilities far beyond what you might see in an untrained member of its species, hence Greer's bafflement.
 
Russ helpfully provided it in his filing.
Wyświetl załącznik 6770273

To be fair he should be sanctioned simply for including phone screenshots in his filings.
I'm nearly 100% sure that the raw image file was posted in one of the threads relating to the fundraiser, (either the fundraiser thread itself or the "Domain Registrar & Epik Seizure" thread that had the poll on whether Null should do the fundraiser) but I wasn't able to find it by highlight skimming. I'll leave hunting between the highlights for someone else.
 
Petition to add the following CSS to the thread (or however XenForo handles it):
CSS:
div[data-lb-id="thread-174285"] .message-userContent::after {
  content: "Sent from my iPhone";
  padding-bottom: 1em;
  display: block;
}
1734656120454.png
 
And so the day's Early Christmas feast ends with a dessert of mashed bananas topped with fresh Kiwi fruit and whipped GreerCream. Couldn't ask for finer!

I swear the judge is going to take a bat to his PC when he has to look at and deal with this shit, and would I EVER love to be that proverbial fly on the wall of his chambers when it happens!
 
Hardin should just go all the way on seeking sanctions and dismissal. Fuck any rules of civil procedure or attempts to play ball. Those are unnecessary to sanction bad faith conduct. This is covered in any law school remedies course:

There is, therefore, nothing in the other sanctioning mechanisms or prior cases interpreting them that warrants a conclusion that federal court may not, as a matter of law, resort to its inherent power to impose attorney's fees as a sanction for bad-faith conduct. This is plainly the case where the conduct at issue is not covered by one of the other sanctioning provisions. But neither is a federal court forbidden to sanction bad-faith conduct by means of the inherent power simply because that conduct could also be sanctioned under the statute or the rules. A court must, of course, exercise caution in invoking its inherent power, and it must comply with the mandates of due process, both in determining that the requisite bad faith exists and in assessing fees, see Roadway Express, supra, at 447 U. S. 767. Furthermore, when there is bad-faith conduct in the course of litigation that could be adequately sanctioned under the rules, the court ordinarily should rely on the rules, rather than the inherent power. But if, in the informed discretion of the court, neither the statute nor the rules are up to the task, the court may safely rely on its inherent power.
Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 50 (1991).

Because of their very potency, inherent powers must be exercised with restraint and discretion. See Roadway Express, supra, 447 U.S. at 447 U. S. 764. A primary aspect of that discretion is the ability to fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct which abuses the judicial process. As we recognized in Roadway Express, outright dismissal of a lawsuit, which we had upheld in Link, is a particularly severe sanction, yet is within the court's discretion. 447 U.S. at 447 U. S. 765. Consequently, the "less severe sanction" of an assessment of attorney's fees is undoubtedly within a court's inherent power as well. Ibid. See also Hutto v. Finney, 437 U. S. 678, 437 U. S. 689, n. 14 (1978).
Id. at 45.

Greer's conduct goes far beyond failure to prosecute, in my opinion. It's legal subterfuge. His failure to disclose any Utah witnesses in his disclosures is fraudulent. It approaches fraud on the court. His attempts to interdict lawful depositions is evidence of the extent to which he believes he may demean the authority of the Court and its procedures. He has zero excuses at this point—his pro se excuses lost potency years ago.

The failure of the Court to deal with this degrades the authority of the judiciary. Within living memory, a district court judge would have long ago called Greer and Hardin into chambers and reamed out Greer for his failure to engage in good faith. This case is not only a waste of judicial and litigant resources, but its continued existence immensely depreciates the authority of the judiciary to resolve cases or controversies in the mind of the public. It's unremediated nonsense is a failing of the Court, not of Greer, and can only be resolved with harsh sanctions.
 
I had a very shitty past couple of days. Thank you, Russell, for the timely filing. I haven't laughed this hard in too long.
 
The failure of the Court to deal with this degrades the authority of the judiciary. Within living memory, a district court judge would have long ago called Greer and Hardin into chambers and reamed out Greer for his failure to engage in good faith. This case is not only a waste of judicial and litigant resources, but its continued existence immensely depreciates the authority of the judiciary to resolve cases or controversies in the mind of the public. It's unremediated nonsense is a failing of the Court, not of Greer, and can only be resolved with harsh sanctions.
I dare say that in the earlier days of our storied Republic this kind of shenanigans would get a judge tarred and feathered and the public would uphold it as a good because such behavior on behalf of the judiciary undermines the very fabric of a polite and rules based society.
 
Petition to add the following CSS to the thread (or however XenForo handles it):
CSS:
div[data-lb-id="thread-174285"] .message-userContent::after {
  content: "Sent from my iPhone";
  padding-bottom: 1em;
  display: block;
}
Wyświetl załącznik 6770496
Can't we have the floating text like the gunt board?
I assume that way it would be less troublesome
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole