Just some math on Nick's 30 percent false positive drug tests. Nick says he took 4-5 tests for about 24 weeks. That's about 100 tests without a false positive. He would have screamed to high heaven if he had a false positive as "evidence."
His claim means there is a 70% chance that any individual test is negative. The probability that Nick managed 100 negative tests is 0.70^100 or 1 in 3,091,690,408,090,220. To put that in perspective, the odds of winning the megamillions or powerball is 1 in 300,000,000.
If the accuracy was 99.3% accurate, there is a 50% chance that 1 out of 100 tests would have a false positive result. Nick had 0.
So Nick can't do math and doesn't understand the idiotic argument that the drug tests are inaccurate with very large false positives and his claim that his 4-5 tests per week are all clean.