💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
but because he doesn't recognize he's out of his depth.
donnny-out-of-your-element-big-lebowski.webp
 
You guys are right. Nick has gained quite a bit of weight and has an unhealthy obsession with food. Constantly bragging about how much he's eating and streaming himself cooking.

He should stop eating for a couple weeks to make sure the problem doesn't get worse.
Nick can't even stop himself from paying money to a pedophile or drinking literal LAKES of alcohol to fuel the corn harvest.

There's no way Nick can give up on being FUCKING FAT.
 
Nicky Slaton is so fat that he gave some of his cocaine to his daughter so that she would let him have all of the confectioner's sugar.
 
Highly doubtful as she was either the account owner or an authorized user on the account. It was just a few weeks ago that they got the account separated.
They have been legally separated and divorced for a long time already. By your logic her reading his private communications because she can "access his account" would be legal, which it is not.

Aaron filed for the divorce, at that point she no longer had any right to his private communication and data.
Having a shared mobile plan does not give her the right to dig into his phone records, in particular since she is actually still married to him and cannot testify against him about things which happened during their marriage.

April cannot testify against Aaron about ANYTHING.
 
There is literally an Aaron thread. I get Balldo McSkellington can't keep Aaron out of his head, but you people have no excuse.

I can't wait though for Nick to react, if a PI hired by Aaron (or his lawyer) is digging through Nick's trash.
 
and cannot testify against him about things which happened during their marriage.
You can 100% testify against your spouse. The state just can't FORCE YOU to testify against your spouse.

Edit: Because I just reread your post again to make sure I wasn't missing something, I want to drive this home. If a man beats his wife (or a wife tries to poison him) nothing is stopping either party from testifying about what happened in a court of law. YOU ARE DUMB.

I'm the dumb one, per @AnOminous apparently in Minnesota this is NOT the case.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
It really sounds like Aaron has no fucking clue what's actually happening and what the chances of what's happening will have any effect on his case are. More and more, I think Aaron is an unreliable narrator not because he's lying maliciously, but because he doesn't recognize he's out of his depth.
Aaron's ex (before April) filed charges against him, right?

Aaron is a detestable retard that has a history of retarded, destructive choices that he continues to make because he's retarded.

He went from assaulting his wife to swinging and doing cocaine to ruining his own legal case because he's an attention whore blabbermouth.

The worst part is he's the least awful person in this saga.
 
Aaron's ex (before April) filed charges against him, right?

Aaron is a detestable retard that has a history of retarded, destructive choices that he continues to make because he's retarded.

He went from assaulting his wife to swinging and doing cocaine to ruining his own legal case because he's an attention whore blabbermouth.

The worst part is he's the least awful person in this saga.
That's all well in good, but how does it connect to Nick Rekieta being the size of the fat farting feeder dragon he masturbated to during the coke stream?
 
You can 100% testify against your spouse. The state just can't FORCE YOU to testify against your spouse.
This has been extensively discussed and, no, not in Minnesota you can't.

"A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, without the consent of the other, be examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage." 595.02(a).
Edit: Because I just reread your post again to make sure I wasn't missing something, I want to drive this home. If a man beats his wife (or a wife tries to poison him) nothing is stopping either party from testifying about what happened in a court of law. YOU ARE DUMB.
That's an explicit exception to the general rule, that and harm to children or homicide.

"This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which one is charged with homicide or an attempt to commit homicide and the date of the marriage of the defendant is subsequent to the date of the offense, nor to an action or proceeding for nonsupport, neglect, dependency, or termination of parental rights.This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which one is charged with homicide or an attempt to commit homicide and the date of the marriage of the defendant is subsequent to the date of the offense, nor to an action or proceeding for nonsupport, neglect, dependency, or termination of parental rights."
 
There is literally an Aaron thread. I get Balldo McSkellington can't keep Aaron out of his head, but you people have no excuse.
I think people are only commenting about Aaron because of the possible "hacking"/ invasion of his Google account that Rekieta might have done.

You can 100% testify against your spouse. The state just can't FORCE YOU to testify against your spouse.
I think the Gobermental Supervisor was referring to testifying about the content of Aaron's private messages she got after the separation because she had access to them on her phone.
 
I think people are only commenting about Aaron because of the possible "hacking"/ invasion of his Google account that Rekieta might have done.


I think the Gobermental Supervisor was referring to testifying about the content of Aaron's private messages she got after the separation because she had access to them on her phone.
It's a moot point, either way @Gobermental Supervisor was right and I was wrong. Apologies for calling you dumb.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole