State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[ye's Official KF Burner]

Kayla’s case update
Wyświetl załącznik 6734818
Wyświetl załącznik 6734825
Wyświetl załącznik 6734824
Wyświetl załącznik 6734823
Wyświetl załącznik 6734821
Wyświetl załącznik 6734820
PDF attached too.
ETA: Denied

I can feel the passive aggressive nature of this denial.
Very interesting how they focused on Aaron's videos for a good chunk though...I guarantee some shit is about to go down.

 

[thebigdream]

Wyświetl załącznik 6734871
There's that word again

The prosecutor really dropped the ball here, it's meant to be a bolded and capitalised like so: DENIED. Based on my understanding of Rekieta Law (the highest law of the land), this makes their entire argument invalid, nah nah nah, you lose, bye bye etc.

 

[HONKY DESTROYER]

0:02

SUFFAH BISH

 

[Useful_Mistake]

@Vibralldo your community post is incorrect. The court made no ruling

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

How many more stamps before Rekeita is entitled to a muffin?

 

[Desktop User2]

Kayla’s case update
Wyświetl załącznik 6734818
Wyświetl załącznik 6734825
Wyświetl załącznik 6734824
Wyświetl załącznik 6734823
Wyświetl załącznik 6734821
Wyświetl załącznik 6734820
PDF attached too.
ETA: Denied

Today there were only paralegals on the Kiwi Farms Law Couch, rare Rackets W. That´s not the ruling, as it was pointed out already. Informative either way.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Uh, the court didn't make that statement, Kayla did.

Kayla is the defendant. The screencap is from the State's response to her motion

 

[RussianParasite]

There's that word again

The more important words in this filing were the two prior to it.

 

[3MMA]

Today there were only paralegals on the Kiwi Farms Law Couch, rare Rackets W. That´s not the ruling, as it was pointed out already. Informative either way.

No where did I call this a ruling, what are you talking about?

 

[Desktop User2]

No where did I call this a ruling, what are you talking about?

VIbraldo´s community post.

 

[Vibralldo]

The prosecutor really dropped the ball here, it's meant to be a bolded and capitalised like so: DENIED. Based on my understanding of Rekieta Law (the highest law of the land), this makes their entire argument invalid, nah nah nah, you lose, bye bye etc.

Not enough emphasis

Try this:

DENIED

 

[Professional Noticer]

For a Lawyer, he sure loses a lot.
I would not hire this man to defend me or watch my kids and/or cocaine.

 

[Vibralldo]

@Vibralldo your community post is incorrect. The court made no ruling

Apologies, I got excited

I deleted the community post if someone wants to make a correct one

 

[Captain Manning]

Today there were only paralegals on the Kiwi Farms Law Couch, rare Rackets W. That´s not the ruling, as it was pointed out already. Informative either way.

Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.

Nick can celebrate when the warrant is tossed.

Right?

 

[Desktop User2]

Nevertheless, we all know it's gonna be denied.

If he wants to be smug for a week or so because some Kiwis jumped the gun and assumed this was the ruling from the bench, let him.

The celebration may be premature, but I think it's hardly off base.

Also, I must say this is WAAAAY better than what Kayla's attorney wrote.

Oh yeah, but his Ls are so common that it would be funny if he took a victory lap in a meaningless mistake and got cocky. We need kahntent badly.

 

[AnOminous]

The prosecutor really dropped the ball here, it's meant to be a bolded and capitalised like so: DENIED. Based on my understanding of Rekieta Law (the highest law of the land), this makes their entire argument invalid, nah nah nah, you lose, bye bye etc.

Only the judge gets to use that voodoo. The prosecutor is merely asking for it. The one with the gavel is the one who actually does it.

 

[Kosher Dill]

How many more stamps before Rekeita is entitled to a muffin?

If he stamps his card with an additional fentanyl charge he can get one free Dindu Muffin.

 

[The Un-Clit]

Kayla is the defendant. The screencap is from the State's response to her motion

I couldn't nuke my failpost fast enough I see.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick can celebrate when the warrant is tossed.

Right?

Technically, sure, but the warrant is valid for him. Wentzell ruled on it. The Appeals Court refused to grant interlocutory appeal. At this point he's taking a plea deal, or going to trial. He's out of pre-trial fuck-fuck games to play.

Meaning that, yes, it's possible for the unusual situation where the warrant is invalid for Kayla, but valid for Nick. I don't think that'll happen though. I think Wentzell will rule it's valid for Kayla too.

With both sides of the argument now submitted, Wentzell should make a decision soon.