💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[TrainWreckWatcher]

This is the second time I am seeing disposable plates for Thanksgiving dinner.
What the actual fuck is wrong with people. How hard is it to drop the dishes into the dishwasher, turn it on?

Considering Nick's kitchen, I would assume he has to use one-time use trash plates because he can't find his dinnerware and cutlery in that hoarder's dream kitchen.

The dishwasher's door is probably missing too.

Everyone beat me to it already damn.
Oh well.

Wyświetl załącznik 6701491

Fucking called it. So basically Nick will get to trot out the old excuse of protecting his kids from people like his own Locals member ever knowing how to best stalk their prey, as the reason why he'll get all the benefit out of the footage that he wants, while cutting out anything and everything inconvenient to his narrative. Whatever happened to his obsession with the "rule of completeness"?

This is about all we'll ever get to see, and his room-temp-IQ audience will fall for it hook, line, and sinker:

Wyświetl załącznik 6701506

Sociopaths like Rekieta need to absolutely control everything they can. You've nailed exactly how he'll go about doing it.
I almost wonder after the case is done if the police could be convinced to FOIA the body cam footage. Especially after they see this knobhead still going about it and shit talking them.

 

[Melty Butter]

Means nothing. All of that can be changed.

Fair enough but let's assume for a moment that this account was created on June 17, 2024.

What was happening on June 17? More shenanigans!

@Useful_Mistake revealed Nick's traffic violations.

Link to post
Then (same day), @Himedall All-seeing Waifu posted multiple screengrabs from Nick's Locals of "-geg-" trolling Nick about the tickets. She (in a fun way) accused one of us (the Farms) of being -geg-.

Link to post
Maybe a coincidence. Maybe not. However, if -geg- is the person behind the fake April Law account, it seems this person just wants to stir up shit in a harmless way. They probably made the account and then changed the name to April Law 1111 after the real April came out with the name in October.
Edit: Clarity

 

[Chazzed Up]

The pictures we have seen suggest everything in that room is his. It's all dude stuff.

Lol I was being sarcastic... any space Nick predominantly occupies appears to be a wreck, I doubt he's better at keeping things tidy than the kids and Kayla are. Plus we already know what kind of stupid purchases he makes.

 

[Vibralldo]

Remind me please, how did that go?

Don’t forget the hardcore “Nick is a good boi!” Balldowashers who have been strung along for months with Nicks vague promises of: “When I’m able to speak out, you’ll get to hear DA TRUTH!”

And what will Nick tell them?

“Well, I did a bunch of coke and had some swinging sex and it fell apart and I got busted! Had to take a guilty plea!”

"The officer rubbed my cocaine that I lied about for months in my daughter's hair and then arrested me, my wife, and my girlfriend that I also lied about for it! It's bullshit!"

 

[Fapcop]

This was......................................... interesting.

• Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
• Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."

TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers

• No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
• Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
• Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
  • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
  • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
• Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
• Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
  • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
• Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time

You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=P6wCm1WAFR4

Wait…

If Barnes was so right, then how come he got felted at every appeal and is about to plead guilty?

Also pretty funny that Viva says EXACTLY what Nick was claiming was a TERRIBLE idea: That he should check himself into rehab for legal reasons.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I just want to touch on this tidbit from the hearing because it's so amusingly bizarre to me. I know Nick gets dunked on for being a "fake lawyer" and all that jazz, but dude is a licensed attorney, has been inside a courtroom and should be aware of basic courtroom etiquette. Why does he need to be told not bring shit into back like he's some random schmuck who got pulled in for drunk driving? I mean it's funny that the bailiff gave him a bit of a felting, but holy shit, dude should know better. Then again, if he knew better, he wouldn't be in this mess in the first place

I think you understate his NPL condition. He has problems with authority AND a lack of courtroom practice. (Remember how how told us that he told off the police during his arrest?) Why would you expect him to give deference to ANYONE?

After all, he is JUST like King David! Are they like David? No... More like JEZEBELS!

This is like the old joke about Pierre, Pierre the Cocksucker.

"I gave my daughter cocaine on just ONE occasion and that happens to be the day that the cops show up wanting to do hair tests!"

Speaking of which, hair tests can pinpoint the date on which the cocaine was consumed. If Rekieta is so convinced that the cops were responsible for the outcome of the test, surely he'd be happy to have the test's outcome revealed publicly, so we can all know the date on which the test shows her having taken the cocaine?

I won't be holding my breath though.

I believe the hair test is able to confirm a range of time--not an exact day.

 

[drsb]

This was......................................... interesting.

• Barnes: "I'm not simping for Rekieta! I'm simping for the constitution!"
• Viva: "Criminal charges or not, Rekieta desperately does need help and he should be checking himself into rehab."

TLDR: Viva & Barnes are still balldowashers

• No video just audio (cuz Barnes is post-hospital?)
• Viva doesn't want to keep talking about Rekieta because it's "too close" to them but then talks about it for an hour
• Barnes says any attorney esp. @Potentially Criminal, Legal Mindset, and Nate are not for the constitution let alone Nick
  • They need to remove Nick's name from the affidavit and realize it's against anyone's amendment rights
  • Anyone not supporting Nick are grifting and don't understand the law
• Barnes says ALL of Lawtube owes him a personal apology because he is right but runs around in circles on why and what he's right about (4:00)
• Barnes goes on again how the mandated reporters were "biased haters"
  • Viva agrees and says Rekieta went after people and that's why he's being targeted
• Viva says there's no proof of child abuse/neglect because kids say they're hungry all the time

You will lose braincells listening but it does pull back the flap and explain the mentality of these two retards. Listened on 1.75 speed and still heard it clearly.

EDIT:
Forgot the most important point! Around 12:00 both say there is "no white powder on his nose" in the video, NONE! Viva says "he zoomed in and looked really hard to see if he saw it and didn't see any." Both believe that point is "church and social media gossip" and if there really was white powder on his nose in the video, a picture would have been included in the affidavit. WILD!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=P6wCm1WAFR4

Thanks for the TLDR. Saved some of my braincells by not having to listen to these two retards!

 

[Melty Butter]

I'd like to point out that this...


... is not nearly enough to feed a family of seven. The pot should be nearly full. One teenage boy (he has two) could eat that on their own and most aren't picky. This has been bothering me since the "beef wagyu" stream. He said 'the kids will eat something else' (paraphrased). I'm sorry, what??? What kid over the age of ten (he has three of those) doesn't eat steak? Is it all Spaghetti-Os and Hot Pockets for them?

Are the kids even there to eat this slop?????

 

[Fapcop]

Thanks for the TLDR. Saved some of my braincells by not having to listen to these two retards!

They’re really embarrassing.

Especially Barnes. (Who of course doesn’t mention that all of Nick’s retarded legal wrangling has FAILED.)

At the end of the day, it’s a pretty simple case. A bunch of people went to a mandatory reporter and said they suspect Nick is doing drugs. The mandatory reporter added his own observations and went to the police.

The detective assigned to the case was notified of this, and was aware of some other facts regarding Rekieta. He then watched his streams, used his training and experience and went: “Yup! He sure acts like he’s high as a kite! And that kinda looks like coke!”

He then went to a judge and went: “Based on these facts, we think there may be drugs at the balldo mansion!” The judge went “Meh, sounds reasonable!” And lo and behold…

THEY ACTUALLY FOUND DRUGS THERE!

Barnes pretends it’s all “hearsay and church gossip” and complains that the detective “only has six years of experience” and doesn’t have “medical or psychological training!” (LMAO WUT?!)

According to Barnes, police needs to go and have half a dozen expert witnesses sign off on a probable cause affidavit or something.

It’s, as I said: Embarrassing and stupid to listen to.

Jesus man, just take an L like a grownup Barnes.

(And on top of that he attacks @Potentially Criminal because he has zero experience or whatever. AND is in debt to Nick, so therefore shouldn’t grift… Wait, that kinda sounds like corruption and nepotism?! Wasn’t Nick according to Barnes a victim of corruption?! How does this work exactly?)

It’s cringe. And Tbf Viva sounds pretty uninformed about the case but not nearly as retarded as Barnes.

EDIT: This is really making me MATI lol! Now they’re going off on how PREPOSTEROUS it is that the search warrant affidavit didn’t include EXACTLY when and where the children reported that they were hungry.

But… The affidavit wasn’t for criminal child neglect! It was merely supporting the basis for the warrant since (surprise!) dirty and hungry kids are often what you see when there’s drug abuse going on.

 

[Vibralldo]

I'd like to point out that this...

Wyświetl załącznik 6701851
... is not nearly enough to feed a family of seven. The pot should be nearly full. One teenage boy (he has two) could eat that on their own and most aren't picky. This has been bothering me since the "beef wagyu" stream. He said 'the kids will eat something else' (paraphrased). I'm sorry, what??? What kid over the age of ten (he has three of those) doesn't eat steak? Is it all Spaghetti-Os and Hot Pockets for them?

Are the kids even there to eat this slop?????

The kids put on a bit of weight at the grandparents' so Nick's having them skip a few meals until they're skinny and fit again like him

 

[All becomes gunt]

They’re really embarrassing.

Especially Barnes. (Who of course doesn’t mention that all of Nick’s retarded legal wrangling has FAILED.)

At the end of the day, it’s a pretty simple case. A bunch of people went to a mandatory reporter and said they suspect Nick is doing drugs. The mandatory reporter added his own observations and went to the police.

The detective assigned to the case was notified of this, and was aware of some other facts regarding Rekieta. He then watched his streams, used his training and experience and went: “Yup! He sure acts like he’s high as a kite! And that kinda looks like coke!”

He then went to a judge and went: “Based on these facts, we think there may be drugs at the balldo mansion!” The judge went “Meh, sounds reasonable!” And lo and behold…

THEY ACTUALLY FOUND DRUGS THERE!

Barnes pretends it’s all “hearsay and church gossip” and complains that the detective “only has six years of experience” and doesn’t have “medical or psychological training!” (LMAO WUT?!)

According to Barnes, police needs to go and have half a dozen expert witnesses sign off on a probable cause affidavit or something.

It’s, as I said: Embarrassing and stupid to listen to.

Jesus man, just take an L like a grownup Barnes.

(And on top of that he attacks @Potentially Criminal because he has zero experience or whatever. AND is in debt to Nick, so therefore shouldn’t grift… Wait, that kinda sounds like corruption and nepotism?! Wasn’t Nick according to Barnes a victim of corruption?! How does this work exactly?)

It’s cringe. And Tbf Viva sounds pretty uninformed about the case but not nearly as retarded as Barnes.

I am not gonna pretend that i am a legal expert like these retards but DUDE WHAT DO YOU EXPECT EM TO DO TO GET A WARRANT ? They are not gonna go through 10 different courts and then 10 years later act on a warrant. Fucking retarded argument all around and if i was that detective i'd be offended by this nigger saying "i am inexperienced". Even people that aren't detectives could see he was flying high as a kite and that was his fault not the detective's fault he just did his job. How about not getting high in the first place, did your client think of that ? Maybe if he didn't break the law ? Everyone in this thread isn't a lawyer or a legal expert for the most part but everyone in the thread can say they dont have the troubles with the law Rekieta has. Just such a retarded situation all around and the county prosecutor must be getting pissed right about now.

 

[AnOminous]

Are the kids even there to eat this slop?????

Why is he even showing this repulsive pig slop? It's embarrassing that a grown man is this sad and pathetic of a cook. It doesn't even look like chili.

Even people that aren't detectives could see he was flying high as a kite and that was his fault not the detective's fault he just did his job.

I'm not a big fan of the whole "police are expert witnesses on everything" bullshit, and have seen some sketchy claims of this sort, but this isn't one of them. Rekieta was obviously coked out of his gourd to the point AND drunk to the point everyone watching this shit was like he's totally on cocaine even before he showed up with cocaine on his nose, rocking back and forth and gurning crazily like a loony bin inmate with tardive dyskinesia.

Barnes pretends it’s all “hearsay and church gossip” and complains that the detective “only has six years of experience” and doesn’t have “medical or psychological training!” (LMAO WUT?!)

It also doesn't even matter. Tons of search warrants are based on literally nothing but hearsay. There's a limit to this. It has to have some indicia of reliability and some effort to corroborate it helps with that (Gates).

It has to be truly threadbare, like a single anonymous informant, before it's clearly insufficient. Even then, the cops can start with an anonymous informant, then at least look at the public activity around the property, note that there are vehicles of known drug users making brief visits at all hours of the day and night, and that this is consistent with drug dealing activity, and then seek a warrant.

Nick is just a losing loser who loses.

 

[Fapcop]

Everyone in this thread isn't a lawyer or a legal expert for the most part but everyone in the thread can say they dont have the troubles with the law Rekieta has. Just such a retarded situation all around and the county prosecutor must be getting pissed right about now.

Again, it’s not rocket science.

(Yup, also not a lawyer.)

All of the individual factors in the search warrant affidavit may by themselves be dismissed as “no big deal” and not enough for a warrant.

(“Nick lost weight… He could be on OZEMPIC!” I shit you not.)

But if you add them together, they all indicate… Drug use! Which is why the judge approved it.

And of course Barnes and Viva don’t mention that all the legal attacks on the search warrant… Failed!

EDIT: NGL, I found this pretty hilarious.

Barnes claims, as a gotcha, the definite proof of the judge being biased!

Namely: The affidavit mentions swatting phone calls! WHICH WERE FALSE!!

“AN UNBIASED JUDGE WOULD HAVE NOTED THAT THE SWATTING CALLS WERE FALSE!”

He really is a retard, isn’t he? Did I just hit my head severely, or aren’t swattings BY DEFINITION false?!

 

[Vibralldo]

I am not gonna pretend that i am a legal expert like these retards but DUDE WHAT DO YOU EXPECT EM TO DO TO GET A WARRANT ?

I think he hates the government enough to be against them even when they actually do something right (like the warrant)

 

[Seafarer]

With Destiny attempting to steal Lolcow of the Year from Rekieta at the last minute by having his sex tapes released, will Nick up the ante by releasing sex tapes of his own before the new year?

 

[Burt Macklin]

Dude, I don't know why the reuploader decided to date this video as Nov 28th, but from what I've heard, this audio is from an old stream on May 28th (https://youtu.be/UEHqZJqHBeA?t=527).

Everything you posted is in that May 28th stream, it's nothing new.

Been trying to wrap my head around how and I bet it was this Viva just uploaded that confused the uploader. Good catch @Third World Aristocrat, sorry to confuse. What a listen tho, never heard before.

I was taken aback by the idea of them continuing with this bullshit now.

After the confusion, I hope they do now. Get the thread to 10k by December 31, 2024

 

[Melty Butter]

He defends the one he loves the most 'n stuff. Nick's spunky tonight. Go Chad!

.



Archive (Someone should check my archive work. I went to Chad's account to get context. Thanks.)

 

[Iron Hamster]

 

[Captain Manning]

Wyświetl załącznik 6702082

Chad is right about this, BTW. Melton used to go in super hard on April when she was with Aaron, and he monetized all of it.

Nick doesn't seem to care about this at all.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

He defends the one he loves the most 'n stuff. Nick's spunky tonight. Go Chad!

.Wyświetl załącznik 6702080
Wyświetl załącznik 6702082
Wyświetl załącznik 6702085
Wyświetl załącznik 6702097
Archive (Someone should check my archive work. I went to Chad's account to get context. Thanks.)

You should archive the individual tweet pages. You archived the reply tab--which will change with each new post. Click each tweet and archive the pages individually.