💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
How does 'I was there' change the point of what the person he's responding to is saying? He was where, in his daughter's hair follicle conducting metabolism?
He was also there with April and Aaron in the hot tub and he promises you he 100% wasn't swinging...

Until he admitted it, then it's ok to have a concubine, you nerd prudes!
 
I've not seen anything indicating he was planning to accept a plea deal.. What makes you think he was willing?

I know people are interpreting the "anathema" comment that way, but I think that's backwards. There is no universe in which Nick Rekieta characterizes pleading out as "the right thing to do."

To Nick, the right thing is to reject any plea that requires him to plead guilty to something he thinks he didn't do. That's the example he wants to set for his children. The anathema is not taking the deal, b/c he knows the odds ain't great.

This interpretation makes more sense imo.
There was also the comment where he said “keeping it going would kill me.” And this was all hours before the conference.
Plus, while on melton’s stream he said “we got an offer, it’s a good but not great” implying he was more trying to negotiate but still take one.
Nick also only ever had his clients take plea deals because he was an awful lawyer who had no chance of ever winning in court. Add all of this together and we have a pretty obvious conclusion that he was planning to take a plea and likely will still
 
It’s entirely possible that this is what made Rekieta go: “I can’t agree to that! My children and my balldo have come to rely on April’s loving, firm hand!”
There is an approximately 0% chance that any offered deal said he couldn't hang out with April. I don't know why everyone is running with this, it's prima facie fucking retarded.
 
There is an approximately 0% chance that any offered deal said he couldn't hang out with April. I don't know why everyone is running with this, it's prima facie fucking retarded.
Actually what I would believe is deal being other way around. That is April's deal telling her to not associate with Nick. 25 gram share with kid man against barely anything woman...
 
To get in the spirit of AI thanksgiving at the crackets
We had our finest experts compile data of what family thanksgiving. May look like.
Only the finest doritos, alcohol and cocaine.

Happy thanksgiving all.
1732830036838.png
1732830356820.png
 
There is an approximately 0% chance that any offered deal said he couldn't hang out with April. I don't know why everyone is running with this, it's prima facie fucking retarded.

A deal that specifically mentions April? Nope. But a 2 year probation period where he can’t spend time with convicted felons or have them living on his property is a fairly normal condition of probation.


Heya there baby!
 
There was also the comment where he said “keeping it going would kill me.” And this was all hours before the conference.
Plus, while on melton’s stream he said “we got an offer, it’s a good but not great” implying he was more trying to negotiate but still take one.
Nick also only ever had his clients take plea deals because he was an awful lawyer who had no chance of ever winning in court. Add all of this together and we have a pretty obvious conclusion that he was planning to take a plea and likely will still
He also said he was going to do something that is antithetical to his nature to set an example for his sons
 
Nick sending Melton a 100$ superchat saying "I will have to do something because its best for my family and to show my boys how to be responsible".
Praphrasing because I am zoo lazy to find the actual quote.
That's the "anathema" statement I'm referencing. He does not say anything about doing "what's best for his family."
 
How does 'I was there' change the point of what the person he's responding to is saying? He was where, in his daughter's hair follicle conducting metabolism?

Nick still thinks he’s this 5D master manipulator who can shyster his way out of anything.

“Did you have sex with April?”
“God no!”
“So you never inserted a balldo attached to your testicles into her vagina?”
“I didn’t say that!”

He still thinks that if he says it don’t happen loud enough and often enough, his audience will believe him.
 
I think April was 5th degree which at worst is gross misdemeanour Meaning not a felony.

She is a known drug user. It does not matter felony vs. misdemeanour. Once you are on probation, they can fuck your shit up because they set the rules.

Bottom line: We do not know what the deal offered was (or if one was offered at all). This is all theory-crafting to pass the time until the next Balldo happening. It is nothing to get so worked up over. BBN and Scarebro have heard rumours. That is all.

Nick is probably stuck spending time with his children at a family function today. He might get on Twitter and sperg a bit, but do not expect too much activity.
 
Due to the severity and improbability of the scenario, I choose not to believe in this hypothesis, despite the well-researched post you published.

I think BBN is just giving too much attention to rumors to provoke a reaction from Rekieta
Makes sense with the whole "we need to monitor someone all night" incident that happened a while back.
 
He drugs up his daughter, hangs out with pedoforks and is a sexual degenerate.
All I'm gonna say is they made a mistake letting the kids near him. And since nick reads his thread. Just a joke bro! I'm sure you're not actually a molester or anything. Probably.
 
I know people are interpreting the "anathema" comment that way, but I think that's backwards. There is no universe in which Nick Rekieta characterizes pleading out as "the right thing to do."
"Anathema" quite literally means the worst kind of sin, it derives from the kind that gets you excommunicated.

There's no way he considers fighting charges "anathema" unless he actually doesn't know what the word means.
I think April was 5th degree which at worst is gross misdemeanour Meaning not a felony.
It's a felony, it's right there on the docket.
Screenshot 2024-11-28 171718.png
I think the actual odds of her being convicted of it as a felony are very low, even if she doesn't play ball, but she is charged with a felony, albeit one of the weakest felonies you can cop.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole