💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
If you talked about the balldo in court, Nick would probably coom his pants because he's an exhibitionist

If you want to effectively humiliate him you could bring up how he's a druggie, his failure as a dad, failure as a lawyer, failure as a YouTuber, his lies, how his friends surpassed him on YouTube, etc

He'd seethe so hard
 
If you talked about the balldo in court, Nick would probably coom his pants because he's an exhibitionist

If you want to effectively humiliate him you could bring up how he's a druggie, his failure as a dad, failure as a lawyer, failure as a YouTuber, his lies, how his friends surpassed him on YouTube, etc

He'd seethe so hard
1732394439247.png
heh... heh... *snicker* they mentioned the Balldo in court. heh... NERRRRDDDSSS... *snorts* PRUUUUUDES... heh-heh...
 
Eh, I get it.

The name was censored ("but its already been posted in the thread!") Being respectful when its optional is nice, fren.

This thread is full of a lot of really, really negative, true, but negative stuff about this family. Primarily, the parents and the people around the parents, of course, but his kids might have come across the thread, and if that's the case, I don't think it's such a terrible thing for them to see a gem of positivity in the midst of all this discussion.

Congrats to the honor roll student! It takes strength of character to go through something this young and to still be able to apply yourself academically, even though things have been so stressful. You should be proud of yourself!

Not to doom-post too much, but children often throw themselves into hobbies or their studies to avoid family dynamic issues.

"Good news" : CPS will still come knocking on Nick's door when they want to. (An analogy would be if you have a kid who reports abuse 1x. You don't automatically lose legal custody depending on circumstances. It varies by state, but the period for the monitoring can last for years).

They will also keep your name on a list for a while, so any inkling of trouble, they will be back. This is what irks Nick: the accountability to the point where you can take into account past actions to judge current motivation. He wants to be able to sever the present perception from his past reputation, and by doing so say that there is not enough to call him into question.

"ALMOST none of my infidelity has been sexual"

Lol

"Erm, a husband not being constantly supportive is really hard and basically infidelity, so the same as me being a member of a polycule if you think about it!"

That is incredible projection, Nick

Of course, he is talking about his former pron addiction or thoughts about women, you incel prude Scandanavian! He NEVER admitted he was in a sexual relationship with April where penetration occurred! Their girlfriend-boyfriend relationship was pure!

At hearing this rebuke, David repents and acknowledges his sin. But I can tell you exactly what Nick would say if he was confronted like this because he's done it every fucking time.
Wyświetl załącznik 6677578
"I hate David because I AM DAVID."
Talk about delusions of grandeur. Rekieta must compare himself to some important biblical figure, showing his narcissism again.

Wyświetl załącznik 6677577
That "yet" intrigues me a bit...
"At least my sons have not raised armies against me... yet."
Lads, your armies are right here when you're ready.

Wow. To end with that.

David felt bad about it and genuinely tried to change. He was a good man plagued by his own flaws that kept fighting. Nick has given up and said, 'What is the point when I get grace anyway?', and he gave up trying to be good.

Also, David did not escape punishment, his own sentence was carried out upon him with 4 of his own sons dying for the 1 man he had killed for his wife.
 
We? Who is we? Is he talking about his Locals tards being child neglecting coke heads or is it the royal we? He must have forgotten about the whole KF "We" debacle he tired to start earlier in the year:
Who Is We.png
Original post

LITERALLY ALL OF HIS DEGENERATE DEFENDERS ARE FAT.

JUJU THE COW, VITO, RALPH, MELTON. ALL OBESE. THE FUCK IS HE TALKING ABOUT?!
You forgot his biggest and fattest defender; His Mom!

We wuz kang David
A'yo Nicky write some dem Psalms nigger.
 
If i was the prosecutor this would be a full segment during cross. I'd legit brainstorm all kind of legal jiujitsu to make it happen. I ain't no lawyer or anything like that but there must be a way to make that happen. Some kind of loophole.
If I were the defense I'd file a motion in limine or something to keep it (and other similar justballdothings) out, or at the very least object about it being more prejudicial than probative at trial. It doesn't really prove he had cocaine or guns, it's just being brought in to make Nick look like the weird, ridiculous pervert he is, which isn't really relevant.
"Mr. Rekieta was sponsored by Birch Gold, some power saw thing...it's like a handheld mini saw. Pretty cool tbh. And the balldo...a thing you put on your balls to make it a dildo."
"The prosecution is telling you that Mr. Rekieta is a Balldo user, but it doesn't make sense. Mr. Rekieta, show the jury your balls."
[shows jury his balls]
"As you see, these are the tiniest chickpea-sized balls any nominal man ever had. Now this is a Balldo."
[shows jury the Balldo]
"A man has to put his balls in this to use this marital aid for impotent men. But look at it! See the size of these rings? See the size of Mr. Rekieta's balls? Mr. Rekieta, put on the Balldo."
[tries and fails to put on the Balldo as it just falls off]
"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, this MAKES NO SENSE. He can't put on the Balldo.

If the Balldo doesn't fit, you MUST ACQUIT!"
 
One problem with this: Unless you're a Christian yourself, this cope is dead on arrival. Even then, without being disrespectful towards Christianity for the sake of its practitioners reading the thread, David isn't Rekieta and playing the "he just like me fr fr" card doesn't change his situation. Taking up a moronic fixation with this individual from this book only serves to distract from Nick's current circumstances, and not to anyone's benefit.

And the way he ends it, trying to be cheeky with a bit of humor? Kill yourself, Nick. It'd be nothing short of heroic if his family unanimously turned against him.

Also, if he doesn't care what the Internet thinks about him, as he has constantly proclaimed, then why has he turned the Internet into his diary? It'd be extremely embarrassing and pathetic even if he hadn't decried these behaviors. This dude is nearing half a century in age and he still emotionally vomits out this bullshit for the consumption and validation of strangers. Very sad.
 
If I were the defense I'd file a motion in limine or something to keep it (and other similar justballdothings) out, or at the very least object about it being more prejudicial than probative at trial. It doesn't really prove he had cocaine or guns, it's just being brought in to make Nick look like the weird, ridiculous pervert he is, which isn't really relevant.
There must be some kind of trick that someone can use though right ? Did the Balldo test positive for cocaine ? If it did we can force that description out of it, and if he objects, play the clip of him describing the balldo.
 
Nick should start a show with Destiny called THE CHADCAST, where they give advice to us hopeless incel dorks about how to be big baller pussy hounds through such methods as eating other men’s cum.
With guest spots for Jack Murphy and Nick Fuentes. Maybe occasionally Ralph to discuss the darker path of caca consumption.
 
There must be some kind of trick that someone can use though right ? Did the Balldo test positive for cocaine ? If it did we can force that description out of it, and if he objects, play the clip of him describing the balldo.
Yes, bring it up completely out of the blue in a question and then let the defense objecting to it attract the bored jury's attention by being the funniest and most ridiculous thing they've heard in hours.

You might get admonished by the judge or have the judge give an instruction that they aren't to take that into account in their deliberations, and they'll try not to, but just like us, the normies on the jury will forever think of him as that Balldo weirdo.

Notice how after "wait. . .wait. . .he's SERIOUS about the Balldo" instantly turned him from Nick Rekieta, Internet Lawyer to Balldo Man in most people's minds? It's because it's fucking ridiculous and you can't forget it.
 
This dude is nearing half a century in age and he still emotionally vomits out this bullshit for the consumption and validation of strangers. Very sad.
He's basically an ethot, a dancing monkey for our amusement. Dance, Balldo, dance!
"At least my sons have not raised armies against me... yet."
Lads, your armies are right here when you're ready.
"I have some flaws, like King David from the Bible. But actually, I'm even better than King David. Take that, David, you fucking bozo."
 
Mike Pence and Billy Graham, regardless of what you think about them, were unironically based for deciding to not be alone with a woman that isn't their wife or a family member. They go so far as to decide it's easier (and better) to avoid the mere appearance of impropriety.

You not only don't put yourself in a situation where you can cheat, you don't put yourself in a situation where it looks like you're doing something wrong. That extra level of care isn't there to ruin your fun, it's to protect yourself and your wife.

It is drawn out from 1 Thessalonians 5:22.

22 - Abstain from all appearance of evil.

That's quite a beautiful psalm and certainly what Nick was trying to channel. But of course, what happened after the great repentance? He got to stay king, his "wife" had a baby that died and he was
unbothered, then knocked her up again, happy happy, and then he pillaged another kingdom and took the crown for his head. And then decided, what the hell, God loves me, I'm righteous, I'm going to pillage everyone and make them suffer in hard labor.

This is what Nick thinks is in store for him, be sure.

Except this did not happen... David was at war for the rest of his life and had a coup led against him by his favourite son Absalom (who cucked him with all his concubines in a very public manner), and it was masterminded by his most capable counsellor, Ahithophel, who was the grandfather of Bathsheba. He had to leave Jerusalem in disgrace before he was able to rally enough troops to take back the capital.

This does not even include the fact that another of his sons, Amnon, raped his half-sister Tamar. Amnon was then subsequently killed by Absalom, her brother.

Another son, Adonijah, was killed when he attempted to claim the crown before Solomon was set upon the throne.

With the death of the original son of Bathsheba, David's judgement of 'four-fold' recompense for Uriah (One of his OG commandoes from the time he was on the run from Saul) is complete. Plus all the family issues and constant problems.

Though side note on the psalm - interesting David says he has sinned against God, and God only - erm, the person he murdered doesn't count?

Also a little unsettling that murdered Uriah was the cuckhold.

The idea is that God is the origin and definition of 'Good', so it is His rules you are breaking. Every offense against another is an offense against God first. There is also some poetic hyperbole going on here.

"I am not a theologian" says a man who just spent an entire post interpreting theology. We're reaching brain holes of unforeseen diameter.

But he never SAID he was a theologian of pastor! YOU just inferred it! Since he never SAID it, he cannot be held to the same standard! He can say whatever he wants, and NO ONE should take him seriously! If people listen to him, that is THEIR choice!

This is what he has argued in the past.

We? Who is we? Is he talking about his Locals tards being child neglecting coke heads or is it the royal we? He must have forgotten about the whole KF "We" debacle he tired to start earlier in the year:

He is trying to generalise, downplay, and deflect. 'Everybody makes mistakes (so mine are not that bad!)' 'Everyone sins (so quit judging me already!)'

Nick uses strictly true statements to indirectly make claims. This is the same thing he did when he messaged Josh about his thread--he was implying what he wanted done with the 'I just want to let you know'.

Men, when your GF/SO/Wife says: 'We are low on cat food', or you are sat on the couch and 'I am thirsty', what do they want you to do?
 
They will also keep your name on a list for a while, so any inkling of trouble, they will be back. This is what irks Nick: the accountability to the point where you can take into account past actions to judge current motivation. He wants to be able to sever the present perception from his past reputation, and by doing so say that there is not enough to call him into question.
Basically Russell Greer with his "I moved on, why can't you?" thing he does while continuing to do exactly what got him his shit reputation. I know, I know, it's getting tiresome pointing out how Nick is basically glomming onto and genestealing the negative traits of every other cow after being possessed by the Sonichu Demon, but it's increasingly hard not to see it.

Literally everything this weirdo does is something some other lolcow did previously.
The idea is that God is the origin and definition of 'Good', so it is His rules you are breaking. Every offense against another is an offense against God first. There is also some poetic hyperbole going on here.
Essentially, you can't "sin" against a person, because a person does not have that attribute. So for instance if David were justified in what he did to Uriah, it would not have been a sin.

Think of it like the way that every criminal case is not "Victim v. Perp," but "State of Minnesota v. Perp."

A crime is a crime against the sovereign, in the U.S. often something like "the People of the State of California," and God is the ultimate sovereign, so all sins would be against Him.

Note, this is what Nick admitted in his gay diary entry posted to the world like a 14 year old girl would do. He admitted he revels in defying God.

This is basically Sadean, Satanic shit.

And look what it's earned him. The wages of sin are coming, buddy boy.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole