💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Nick LOCALS Chat Highlights Part II:

1731810356466.png

1731810379823.png

1731811054779.png

1731811658166.png

1731813439218.png

1731813663534.png

1731813840327.png

1731814159941.png
 
Well, I mean, he mocked Keffals. Let's not get ridiculous.
Keffals cooked a decent pasta dish (he's Italian), never had a child test positive for cocaine, but was also adjacent to gross nonces and potentially a groomer himself; with the collars and shit.
Weighing the various criterion, I think skelly slightly better. He deserves a sticker for this, alongside the ones for his daughter not testing positive for cocaethylene and norcocaine. :really:
Ron did himself no favors saying "I'd rather be a cuck with Monica, than live without her," but I attribute that more to him being a fucking idiot, and not a confession.
I don't know, it just sounds like he's simping for his ex/girlfriend whatever, where he thought the emotional bond was tighter than it really is.
Unless he watched other men or women fuck his wife, he's not a cuck. I'd agree it's a foolish arrangement of words and makes him sound pathetic.

Wait, how many balldos does he own?
He had a grey one as well, it was Drexel's which he claimed wasn't used (big X to doubt). Drexel got it back I think.
Imagine this, at some point he had TWO of these devices lying around. I'd love to be a specter in the walls to see what happened.
Actually, no. I take that back. :really:

Yeah that's the thing, if it was just over or around the cut off, I could maybe buy "accidental" exposure, but ten fucking times the cut off??
How the fuck do you pop a 10 times the cut off dose, a level that indicates regular or habitual use by accident?
This is a hair test, not a piss test, so that level is accumulated over a period of time, it's not just one large dose, what she "accidentally" managed to get into his stuff multiple times?
I know that 10x the reference value seems very high, but it really depends on the tests. Some tests consider 10x the reference value as nothing, while others see 2x as a huge difference. So, I think it’s better to leave this kind of analysis to people who really understand the interpretation well.
I'm going to collate everything I've written on the subject in one big post later. I might even get an old colleague to proofread it, I'm not skelly and his paedophile friends and I don't want to spread disinformation.
In general, x10 the cutoff will not come from contamination. The lab that tested these samples have a decontamination protocol that they used which works very well according to the papers I've read (in full, not just the abstract). With their protocol, rates that indicate heavy use dropped to somewhere above the ordinary cutoff at 150pg/mg at the maxima. <150pg/mg is used for average workers. Public servants require <100pg/mg and medical staff are at <300pg/mg. 500 is used for the general public.
They also retest the sample in the case of a child.

>5000pg/mg (greater than) just will not happen with skelly's delusional glove story. I'm not sure why it's >5000 rather than an actual number like 4572. However, if you think about it, it will send shivers down your spine. Perhaps the test they ran had a determination of only up to 5000. Generally, a smaller range gives higher resolution, it could just be 0-5000pg/mg for this test that's able to discriminate between a tenth of a picogram. >5000pg/mg could be 10,000 or even more, ie beyond the GC-MS configuration.
1731817273945.png
The way cocaine interacts in a child's system isn't well know, because, well, we can't ethically evaluate this. We can't just gather a bunch of children that uses cocaine to see how the drug interacts with their system. Based on this, I think the police will not be perusing action. They can already pin child endangerment on the qover because they had loose firearms and cocaine around children.
 
As an ultimate UFC/MMA fan who is watching the fights, you can tell this faggot knows nothing about the sport. He didn't grift off the Paul V Tyson fight like everyone else last night because he's a dumb faggot that doesn't know sports, so now he thinks he can make up for it. Dumb pussy cuck faggot.

EDIT: Old Stream went down. Here's a new links if you don't want to PPV $100 for the fight https://jj.mmastreamlinks.com/detail-match/2600049124
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
He didn't grift off the Paul V Tyson fight like everyone else last night because he's a dumb faggot that doesn't know sports, so now he thinks he can make up for it. Dumb pussy cuck faggot.
Nick makes a smart decision by keeping his mouth shut at first, and immediately ruins it by running his mouth and getting involved in shit he has no business being involved in.

This is just a summary of his entire life.
 
Keffals cooked a decent pasta dish (he's Italian), never had a child test positive for cocaine, but was also adjacent to gross nonces and potentially a groomer himself; with the collars and shit.
Weighing the various criterion, I think skelly slightly better. He deserves a sticker for this, alongside the ones for his daughter not testing positive for cocaethylene and norcocaine
Keffals helped get a ton of kids to ruin their lives for his sexual pleasure by taking bathtub hrt and sending catboy progress pics

Nick only ruined his own and Aaron's kids' lives

Nick is an irredeemable piece of shit, but Keffals is magnitudes worse
 
Aug. 21: Nick's omnibus hearing. Kayla's mother, Sharilyn Sletta, consoles Kayla in the gallery.
Oct. 26: Dan Sletta, Kayla's stepdad, posts a heartbreaking comment on Kayla's FB account.
Oct. 27-Nov. 11: Nick returns to Locals streaming 4-5x, often with Kayla out of frame. They allow several of their children to be shown/talk to them. Celeste and Bob are present for one.
Oct. 28: Kayla's omnibus hearing. Kayla's family does NOT attend. Nick does.
Laying out that timeline really does make it feel like there was a power struggle between all parties and Nick's side managed to hang on barely. My personal theory isn't that Nick himself succeeded in this, but that his parents (probably mostly his mother) were the ones to really apply pressure, and I wouldn't be surprised if Celeste and Bob basically gave an ultimatum to Kayla's parents about a possible divorce and money from that. Kayla's family isn't well off, and if Nick's family used pressure like "if you divorce Nick you won't get any money and you won't get the house, or if you do we will make sure it takes a long time," then I can imagine Kayla's family being 'forced' to stay out of the situation because they couldn't financially support Kayla and the kids. Why would Dan make a public comment on Kayla's FB account, when I would think normally he could just call her (or just drive to her house and see her in person). Something must have happened to cause Kayla's side of the family to seemingly step back, especially since they seemed to actually care and be more aware of the bad things happening than Celeste and Bob.

All speculation of course.
 
1731819402844.png

Wouldn't the joke be that an Irish slaveowner fucked one of his slaves? Them being a slave (presumably African) would be the reason for the cornrows, and the Irish given name would come from the "someone" who fucked them. If it was an Irish slave, then them being fucked would have nothing to do with anything because they'd already embody the traits necessary to have that hairstyle with that name. The holes in his brain must be expanding if this is him making a joke off the cuff.

If you want the snappy delivery, you could say "some slave got fucked by its Irish owner." If anything, giving the reader a breath with the full stop undermines the snappiness of his joke. If he had put the more crude element in the second short sentence, it might work better. "This Irish guy had a slave. He fucked it." The way he wrote it seems undercooked and like he was overeager to make some dumb sexual remark. Maybe I'm overthinking this at this point.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6654199

Wouldn't the joke be that an Irish slaveowner fucked one of his slaves? Them being a slave (presumably African) would be the reason for the cornrows, and the Irish given name would come from the "someone" who fucked them. If it was an Irish slave, then them being fucked would have nothing to do with anything because they'd already embody the traits necessary to have that hairstyle with that name. The holes in his brain must be expanding if this is him making a joke off the cuff.

If you want the snappy delivery, you could say "some slave got fucked by its Irish owner." If anything, giving the reader a breath with the full stop undermines the snappiness of his joke. If he had put the more crude element in the second short sentence, it might work better. "This Irish guy had a slave. He fucked it." The way he wrote it seems undercooked and like he was overeager to make some dumb sexual remark. Maybe I'm overthinking this at this point.
Historically the Irish were only a few degrees separated from niggers, but instead of slaves they were called "indentured servants."
 
1. Kayla in Locals reinforces my theory that Nick's being babysat and/or monitored by Kayla. This is her first appearance in, what, 18 months? (PLEASE tell me she knows what's happened on Xitter.)
If Kayla has checked out of the marriage and is only sticking around for the kids and/or the house, why would she feel the need to babysit his online presence? She surely knows that anything, including his Locals, will be archived and easily accessible to her, her attorney, and her family. Her reappearance online seems more to be (at least to me) Nick desperately attempting to keep up appearances for whatever reason by dragging her and their kids into the spotlight than Kayla acting as some sort of watchdog.
 
If Kayla has checked out of the marriage and is only sticking around for the kids and/or the house, why would she feel the need to babysit his online presence? She surely knows that anything, including his Locals, will be archived and easily accessible to her, her attorney, and her family. Her reappearance online seems more to be (at least to me) Nick desperately attempting to keep up appearances for whatever reason by dragging her and their kids into the spotlight than Kayla acting as some sort of watchdog.
Maybe because she's fucking worried after he bragged about the shit that went down with Aaron's email? I dunno, there are lots of reasons to be more "present" when your husband is a fucking nutjob. There won't be anything left to take if he fucks up enough to lose all their assets before she can divorce him.

Damn he wants to talk shit but lets every person rile him up. One dude with 50 followers is enough to get Nick kvetching like a Karen trying to use an expired coupon.

Not the behavior of someone who has better things to do with his life, kids and dog(s) to feed, wife or girlfriend to fuck...
 
Any parent would, and should, be horrified by Kayla's decision to stay with Nick.

I get that it's 20 years of marriage and 5 kids. I could understand sticking around in spite of the polycule fallout and even the drugs fallout since that's on both of them. If both of them went radio silent and there was a short message that they were going to take time to fix their shit, I'd be applauding. But it's conduct during the aftermath that causes me to scratch my head and wonder why we haven't seen a divorce filing. April is still in the picture. April, who has said some awful things about Kayla and the marriage ("she doesn't love Nick for who he truly is," "looks like it's going to be me and you, baby," etc) and continues to live at the house next door while according to Kiki, also continues to be the side piece getting action when Kayla's not around.

April is secondary to Nick's actions. He who continues to have April's presence in their lives. He who allows April to continue saying horrible things, only putting his foot down when April mentioned Kayla's alleged tweeting (but not for anything prior). Nick who continually makes bad decisions that jeopardize his chances to be around his kids: the data breach, going on streams haggard and questionably sober, etc. Nick, who professed to miss his girlfriend and says how her vagina "is awesome."

If I'm Kayla's mother or father, I'm having the come-to-Jesus talk: It's better to be a single mother flipping burgers for minimum wage than tolerating this circus at the expense of her dignity. Better for the kids, too. What lessons re: motherhood and wifedom does she think her daughters in particular are going to take away from this, esp when they're older? When the daughters are old enough to conceptualize exactly what happened, I don't think they're going to be moved by the, "I stayed for you, sweetheart"-line.
 
The time between something being 'confirmed' on the Farms and Nick admitting it is shrinking... Hedo II took ~3 years. The non-monogamy slightly shorter, drug abuse a few months shorter, and so on... We are down to mere months!
Eventually it will be negative. He'll just be admitting to stuff he hasn't even done yet. "Hey guys, next month when I rape that pug, I mean fuck that pug, the pug will have consented, okay, guys? Don't get WEIRD about this!"
 
If you want the snappy delivery, you could say "some slave got fucked by its Irish owner." If anything, giving the reader a breath with the full stop undermines the snappiness of his joke. If he had put the more crude element in the second short sentence, it might work better. "This Irish guy had a slave. He fucked it." The way he wrote it seems undercooked and like he was overeager to make some dumb sexual remark. Maybe I'm overthinking this at this point.
The guy he's talking about is Marcus "The Maniac" McGhee. From Detroit. Father went to prison when he was a kid. Raised by a single mom. Got in trouble in his youth, started going to the gym, MMA straightened his life out. Instead of Nick making jokes that aren't funny, maybe learn about the fucking dude and garner some inspiration to turn your fucking life around cuck!

EDIT
Lol please, Lord Balldo. Guaranteed Nick's parents are the grantors. There would be little point in having the trust if Nick and Kayla are both the grantors and trustees with retained interest. Especially for a trust that owns real property.
Didn't KF prove the house is in his father's name?
 
Historically the Irish were only a few degrees separated from niggers, but instead of slaves they were called "indentured servants."
And by some accounts it was worse since indentured servants were servants for a set term and weren't paid until that term ended, so their owners were incentivized to literally work them to death first so that they never had to pay them, and then they could be replaced with new indentured servants. Also, none of this makes Nick's joke any more or less funny, I just really like pointing out this quirk about indentured servitude vs. nigger slavery.

The guy he's talking about is Marcus "The Maniac" McGhee. From Detroit. Father went to prison when he was a kid. Raised by a single mom. Got in trouble in his youth, started going to the gym, MMA straightened his life out. Instead of Nick making jokes that aren't funny, maybe learn about the fucking dude and garner some inspiration to turn your fucking life around cuck!
Hold on though, Nick can't be racist because his best friend is bla- oh, right. That black best friend openly mocks him and has nothing to do with him now. So, Nick is just a racist.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6654199

Wouldn't the joke be that an Irish slaveowner fucked one of his slaves? Them being a slave (presumably African) would be the reason for the cornrows, and the Irish given name would come from the "someone" who fucked them. If it was an Irish slave, then them being fucked would have nothing to do with anything because they'd already embody the traits necessary to have that hairstyle with that name. The holes in his brain must be expanding if this is him making a joke off the cuff.

If you want the snappy delivery, you could say "some slave got fucked by its Irish owner." If anything, giving the reader a breath with the full stop undermines the snappiness of his joke. If he had put the more crude element in the second short sentence, it might work better. "This Irish guy had a slave. He fucked it." The way he wrote it seems undercooked and like he was overeager to make some dumb sexual remark. Maybe I'm overthinking this at this point.
It's a joke making fun of the Irish because you'd expect the master to be Irish and the slave to be black. Or maybe I'm being too charitable to Balldo here
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole