I never said woke, I essentially said exclusively Current Year humor to where the show now exclusively relies or milks a topic like the 2016 election, it isn't woke but I don't think it is as memorable as the older episodes probably since a lot of modern culture is unremarkable and behind the times you could say.
I think it's moreso the case that men naturally have a greater inclination towards polygamy. Males of all species are rewarded for spreading their genes as far and as often as possible, so of course they tend to be less selective than women WRT choosing partners.
When I was a young man, I had people actually laugh in my face when I told them I wanted to settle down with someone special. I honestly can't wrap my brain around why it's so absurd so as to be amusing.
I stopped going to the bars in my 20s because of this. I don't want a random fuck, I want a partner. I've never been in to sleeping around which seems to be quite rare in this community.
A lot of people never realize the difference between happiness and gratification. Some people never do, and get angry at the suggestion that they're separate.
Typing your retarded opinions into a black, glass rectangle that uses electrically charged rocks convinced to do logic isn't exactly natural either and neither is half of the shit you do or consume on a daily basis.
Counter-point: desiring to have sex for gratification IS natural because there would otherwise be little to no incentive to reproduce as a species. I guarantee if this wasn't the case then there would be way less offspring produced in the wild among wildlife. This is an evolutionary trait dating back millions of years. This works against us nowadays in a social and civilized society, but made sense prior.
Actually it is all natural. The computer is a human invention that uses principles and rules of physics that predate us to work. It's not some 'unnatural black magic'. Even processed food, no matter how unhealthy is still a product derived from nature. Conversing and sharing ideas is also a pretty normal thing to do, and the computer augments our ability to do so. What isn't natural is (as I stated) opposing the clear cut purpose of something of which the design, usage, and purpose is beyond our control. You didn't design your own body after all. If you mistreat and go against its own nature, it will cease to work properly. Put simply:
The anus's purpose is not for sexual penetration. I don't have to redefine anything here. Another example being that poop is not for consumption. Would you argue eating poop is 'natural'? If you argue that gay anal sex is of our nature, then where is the cutoff point?
I want to further point out that my point here is that we have the intellect to understand what is and isn't prosperous behavior and have the capability to act deliberately, unlike animals. Animals also engage in unhealthy behaviors for any manner of reasons. Frankly, it doesn't matter that animals engage in homosexual behavior in extraneous circumstances because we know plainly that homosexuality is oppositional to the natural system of sexual reproduction. Allow me also to refine my thoughts on this:
Because it seems like some people got hung up on it. What I am saying here is the plain and objective fact that if human beings did not reproduce sexually, as in there is no female or male. There would be no such thing as sexuality. Because we wouldn't have sex, because we wouldn't sexually reproduce. We wouldn't have male or female genitalia. Sexuality comes from the fact that we do sexually reproduce. Which only works when a male and female copulates. The entire point of that system is to reproduce. By a god, or by evolution, the human body, brain and all was designed and refined to reproduce only via these means. Therefore it stands to reason that following this normal, natural behavior is nurturing to one's brain, and by extension their mental well being.
I will kindly ask fags to stop doing anal when you stop frying your brain with dinosaur porn.
Poopdick. That is all.
Prostate tissue originates from the pelvic part of the urogenital sinus, an intermediate structure that exists only during fetal development. In females, this same tissue differentiates into part of the vagina. Given this, it is likely that the prostate sensory innervation responsible for the "male g-spot" is vestigial, and exists for the same reason that male nipples exist; it is cheaper to let it grow and not be used than to have more complex gene regulation to control an already complex neonatal development process. Just in case anyone wonders why we really have the "male g spot".
I get what you're saying in that I find being pilled while surrounded by non-pilled people extremely alienating. But we should avoid this grass-is-always-greener thinking when assuming idiots and losers and woke types are happier. Troons and redditors for instance generally aren't happy - however, they lack the self awareness to know why. You and I can point to a problem and say "this makes me MATI/blackpilled/alienated" while they're sat at their computers thinking "I got 600 upvotes today and I got my balls cut off, why am I still miserable?!"
Of all the arguments one could lobby against homosexual men this is one of the least valid. Get more fiber in your diet and clean your butt, it'll do you good even if you don't take it up the rear.
Late reply but no, the show didn't go woke, but ever since they made Tweek and Craig a canon gay ship the fandom took a turn for the worse. I don't know about the gays here, but I swear I've seen more pooners obsessed with Tweek and Craig's relationship than actually gay people. Also, I have no idea why this show out of all fandoms has so many young teens and adults who identify as some flavor of LGBTQ. You either bump into self proclaim TIFs (either non binaries or trans men) or lesbians. Pooners I get since the show attracts yaoi addicts but lesbians? The show hasn't done anything with the female 4th graders and has no canon lesbians on the show. Why would so many gay women (if they are even gay) be attached to this show?
Sorry for double post but I did want to ask the gays here about this. What are your thoughts about these "queer" young people and teens obsession with gaslighting themselves into believing an obvious straight character is gay? I never understood how people could find fun in doing that, and I personally think its a very unhealthy thing to do since there's cases of fans outright sending death threats to authors and creators because they dared not to make their gay ship canon. In the case of South Park its very odd since the show has a few canon gay ships in Tweek and Craig, Mr. Slave and Big Gay Al, etc. But these fans were more upset that Stan and Kenny's character sheets for the game Fractured But Whole stated they were straight. They kept trying desperately to find something that would prove that these characters weren't straight like their lives depended on it. Again, its an unhealthy attitude to have because these types make it seem like they can't love their favorite character unless the character was exactly how their interpret said character.
As a TRUE and HONEST cock connoisseur I find the young people who do this to be fucking obnoxious. For one, the term "queer" is used ubiquitously to the point where it doesn't have an agreed-upon definition, and anyone can identify as queer to get victimhood points.
