To say that it's it's not "as devastating as anybody thought it would be" goes beyond cope, and beyond simple lying into delusional alternate reality land worthy of the Law Pope himself.
These two loony toons have shown themselves so abjectly incompetent they should never be taken seriously about anything ever again.
It's fucking sad is what it is. Cope and sneed faggots.
Even the state, in their filing, appeared resigned to another set of briefs on a general challenge to probable cause before the case moved forward.
Tbh it's at least possible that's a point for appeal but it still is going to come after trial, possibly even while Nick is cooling his heels in jail.
I was also anticipating such a challenge, either to some or all the evidence, whether a motion in limine or just another attack on the warrant on its face, and the fact the state appeared to expect one too makes me wonder. Wentzell stated you're supposed to bring all that at once in the omnibus and not litigate it piecemeal, but I really don't know Minnesota procedure in much detail at all (from what some have said here it is pretty quirky).
It just seems there are motions that could be possible but that the omnibus stage, as early as it is in the proceedings, might be at a time when they aren't yet ripe for decision.
While it's entirely plausible for a jew to create fake documents in an effort to extort money, it's just as likely that the judgement was real, but whoever tried to look it up couldn't find it.
I couldn't find it either and I probably searched the same way the plaintiff's lawyer did. Either Nierman got the case citation wrong, the clerk's office fucked up entering it, it isn't in the index for whatever other reason or (the least likely) he outright made it up. I really don't think he just made it up though.
In any event the FDCPA is incredibly unforgiving, and whatever the status of the underlying case (I assume it actually exists despite not being able to find it myself), plaintiff blew the proper subpoena procedure and made some rather overreaching threats which I believe did violate the FDCPA.
This Shaul Levy dude is a bit of a bozo himself. He appears to be a constant deadbeat who is always in court. There are tons of cases, state and federal, involving this clown, just not the one this FDCPA case was supposedly about.
Anyway the scariest part of the FDCPA isn't the debt itself, often a trifling amount, but the fee shifting provision. Look how this guy's lawyers got six figures over a few thousand in debt. As you can see, fucking up once on an FDCPA violation can cost you whatever profits you've made in a year of successful collections.