💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[AnOminous]

He delivers jokes like there's an inaudible, invisible laugh track only he can hear.

Somehow the audience never laughs. They sit there in stone-faced silence, wondering when a punch line is ever going to appear.

And Nick, pathetic loser that he is, blames the audience for not laughing at his zero-humor "jokes."

Because in his tiny little mind, it's the fault of the audience that they aren't laughing when he isn't being funny because he is too fucking stupid to deliver a joke that actually makes an audience laugh.

 

[Pagan Min]

I see that this thread is almost at 6k pages. Wouldn't it be WEIRD and FUNNY if we here at the farms got a 6k gift before the locals cucks got their 5k gift from Nick? Perhaps a little piece of celebratory art or something. Preferably featuring cute Kiwis and the slobbermutt. I don't know I just think it'd be funny. I'm not telling you to do anything, or whatever, I just wanted you to know. That it'd be funny.

Wouldn't the REAL 6k gift be all the friends we made along the way?

 

[AnOminous]

Wouldn't the REAL 6k gift be all the friends we made along the way?

The friends we made along the way are always the real gift.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick here is openly declaring that this is a potential conspiracy, since he is claiming the state intentionally only appoints poor council so it can fuck over parents.

Correct.

But let's be real here. Even if he wasn't playing up this evil government conspiracy shit, he'd probably still throw some sort of tantrum because he didn't get what he wanted now now NOW. He's a man baby, and he's going through something he's not fully in control of. A point which he's conceded through his "I am under the thumb of government" caterwauling.

Some people handle things like this with an air of grace. Nick does not.

 

[sweetie_squad_4_lyfe]

Wouldn't the REAL 6k gift be all the friends we made along the way?

Not good enough. I need adorable cartoon kiwis and weird inside jokes in a silly drawing.
I won't outright tell anyone to make it, but I'll just heavily imply it.

 

[parsnip]

He's mad because the county did fuck him over. They reunited him with his kids he doesn't want to take care of. Poor guy can't even depend on the state to keep those damn kids out of his house.

 

[Strix454]

So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick's claims that the entire county government, county judges and local attorneys are conspiring together against parents deserve the fullest possible investigation

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

Imagine being a THIEF. Like Nick. A thieving liar who promised to deliver something and arrogantly refuses and scoffs at the very idea anyone expects a worm like him to live up to his word.

Have you considered that because they don't LOVE him anymore they don't DESERVE the 5k gift?

Add that to the affidavit! I'm starting to feel a sneaking suspicion that Kandiyohi County is conspiring against Balldo enjoyers, and the only remedy is bodycam footage.

I believe there's a Kandiyohi County conspiracy against the true and honest parents.

I want rekieta humbled, his smugness is annoying. When the judge is putting him into pound rekieta in the ass penitentiary?

At this point what could humble him? He may make tactical moves (such as taking a plea deal to bury the bodycams) but I don't believe he is able to be humbled.

So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick's claims that the entire county government, county judges and local attorneys are conspiring together against parents deserve the fullest possible investigation

At this point each and every trial in Kandiyohi County is as credible as show trials under Stalin.

 

[Strix454]

This year! He represented your girl April on her speeding ticket! Remember?

I mean, he DIDN'T DO A FUCKING THING, no-showed, and she was automatically convicted, but he IS listed on the official docket as being her defense attorney on that case.

Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

So now Nick has offered up a new conspiracy involving the county deliberately offering incompetent and/or corrupt legal representation to parents presumably to steal children. After listening to Barnes describe how Nick arrest was political retaliation and an attempt to silence him, I sure think it would be a good idea if as much information as possible about this case were released to the public. Its a serious matter of public interest.

Nick testifying to so many government malfeasances...
I now believe the rumor that some corrupt cop may have planted the cocaine has some credence.
Kandiyohi County officials should publish the bodycam footage to help elucidate these rumors.

 

[Swole McPole]

Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.

It's hard to keep your appointments when you've got an ounce of coke in the house. That crack isn't going to smoke itself.

I'll just have one last pipe and then I'll do it, I promise...

 

[Fungible penis]

SEAN! SEAN! What about the rules of evidence, Sean?!

Wyświetl załącznik 6300280Wyświetl załącznik 6300295Wyświetl załącznik 6300279Wyświetl załącznik 6300308Wyświetl załącznik 6300328

I hope he never stops posting.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Null needs Barnes's bullshit to make his case it is in the public interest to release the Rekieta bodycam.

It should be more. Here's my list YMMV

1. The state took children away from a resident in good standing that is admitted to the MN bar with no criminal history. Part of the basis for that removal was the condition of the home. The PUBLIC has the right to see what conditions triggered that removal beyond the word "cluttered."
2. Rekieta disputes that his home was in a condition that warranted removal.
3. Rekieta has alleged the person that took custody of the children for KCHHS lied to the court.
4. Directly and through proxies, Rekieta has alleged malfeasance by the police, prosecutor, the courts (GAL) and KCHHS.
5. Confidence in child protective services is always a public concern and releasing the body cam footage will help determine if that confidence is misplaced.

At the very least, ask the court to order a redacted version (juvenile faces and identities removed) of the body cam footage to ensure the public that the condition of the home was such to justify removal. The public needs to know what constitutes justification for child removal to remain confident in KCHHS. Statements by Rekieta make the bodycam release even more imperative as he alleges it was not justified. Transparency requires the release of the video so the public can assess whether Rekieta's claims have merit and whether confidence in KCHHS is misplaced.

Parties to the case should be ordered to respond to the motion with whether they consent or object to releasing the video and what would cure their objection.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick loses in both cases. Sean is correct.

I figured, but I wanted to highlight in particular the absurdity and hypocrisy of Nick trying to make hay over where Sean is licensed and practices. Since when has that ever been a problem for Lawtube?

Nick isn't licensed in Virginia (Depp v. Heard) or Wisconsin (State v. Rittenhouse). That didn't stop him from making bank off commentating on either case.

Sean does it in Nick's case and Nick suddenly thinks Sean should kill himself make a million dolkars eat a sandwich. Nick would have a better appearing argument if he pointed out specifically how he thinks Sean is wrong on MN law but, of course, we know why he won't.

Just for the sake of completeness, it should be remembered that Nick no-showed the hearing which was over ZOOM CALL and refused to even make the tiny effort to reschedule it. He didn't even have to leave the house or get dressed to take care of it.

Yes, but even a Zoom would be very problematic for him if he were fucked up at that time.

My headcanon is he was passed out in a pool of his own piss or vomit when that hearing occurred. It may or may not be true, but it's certainly funny, so I'm just gonna keep thinking it.

 

[hamsteak]

Except… When was the last time “Rekieta Law” actually had a case or operated as a law firm?

That one time he "represented his whore side piece and then failed to show up to a virtual hearing.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Rekieta's mod is apparently taking a page out of Rekieta's playbook:


(Archive)

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Why did Rekieta need a court-appointed lawyer for the CPS stuff in the first place?

 

[Bean Sidhe]

(Smug Nick pic)

He looks exactly like Tommy Tooter in this picture. I am sure that is what he was going for.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

The rule of completeness doesn't mean what balldo thinks it means and would likely be worse for him if it were invoked

To Nick, it means the bull HAS to nut in his ass.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I figured, but I wanted to highlight in particular the absurdity and hypocrisy of Nick trying to make hay over where Sean is licensed and practices. Since when has that ever been a problem for Lawtube?

You're right. It's never been a problem. But two things stick out when he complained: 1) he's wrong about the rule in MN. It's why the judge smacked him down very publicly in court and 2) the rule in OH, which he implied was somehow different, is nearly identical to the MN rule. He's trying to discredit Sean as if he is in a place of righteousness when he's just talking out of his ass. Two months after the judge smacked him down, he doesn't understand why the "rule of completeness" doesn't apply. His attorney probably said "WTF are you talking about?" because they know the rules of evidence and Nick took that to mean they didn't understand it when in fact they were calling him an idiot.