💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

The price of 5k of such exquisite hallmarks of dedication hedges into that coke and swinger slut budget.

Hey now, Nick was definitely going to spend the money regardless of the coke and swinger budget. It was that damn Monty and his damn lawsuit that is preventing Nick from putting out the 30k or whatever he said it was going to cost.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

How long you reckon before Nick makes inapropriate advances to the new housekeeper and leaves her a nervous wreck google searching "narcissistic abuse" to learn about what he did to her, too?

Am I missing something? Is there a new nanny? Have Nick's parents hired a service to clean the cracks home?

I would assume that there will have to be something of the kind in place while the CPS are inspecting the home several times a month, and I doubt Nick, Kalya, or April will be up to the task of cleaning. The sad answer would be that the parents do the cleaning.

This reminds me. Nick DID try something similar. From the lawsuit OP:

He said as much on stream. (Paraphrased) 'I don't have evidence that he is NOT a paedo. All these people said for years that he was, and that gives me a good reason to think so. Monty, show me proof otherwise'.

It was insanity, and the thread had a few pages with jollies about 'Show me proof you are not a cuck, Nick.'

 

[AnOminous]

Barnes is very flash and bang but I've found over time the actual legal substance of his arguments is oftentimes flimsy or quite pigeonholed.

Remember that trial lawyers are generally not aiming their arguments at other lawyers, but at a jury that doesn't know the law. They may have been instructed about the language of the law and the jury instructions, but that's all they know.

This is why someone like Johnnie Cochran was one of the greatest defense lawyers of his century. Did the shit he said make sense all the time? Not really. If anything, his premier technique was to make the whole case not make sense. That's why even the Chewbacca defense scene satirizing him worked. He wasn't just good at spouting nonsense, but at making everything about the case look like nonsense.

The thing about Barnes doing this on stream, though, is it's one thing to spout nonsense at people who were specifically chosen for not knowing anything, and spouting nonsense at people who are already thoroughly sure you are completely full of shit.

It's difficult to say if Barnes would have harmed Kyle (the state's case was weak, and Binger was an absolute faggot), but I am very glad he wasn't on the case.

I literally nearly flew into a rage every time I even saw that guy talking. Binger I mean. My blood pressure went up. From the outcome, I think the jury felt the same. That dude is one of the sleaziest, greasiest pieces of lying shit I've ever seen in my life, and I just already automatically detest prosecutors. They are the worst people in the world. People who do criminal defense for fucking child rapists are better people.

And Binger is the worst of the lot. He's one of those "you better hope the revolution never comes" guys.

To get the copcams, does it really matter if Nick said it explicitely or not?
Isn't the important part whether or not there are rumors or widespread belief that the cops did something wrong?

Nick's whole schtick, and it becomes blindingly transparent once you see it, is to pull his shitty, faggy Vlad the Implier trick until you point out what he just said, and then he sucks a gigantic dick and then says "I never said that."

And that's the time his smug fucking face needs a fist on it.

I certainly agree that Randazza should have advised Nick that consistently repeating the defamatory statements you are being sued for (ones that you and your attorney failed to find evidence as to their accuracy) is a bad idea, and that he shouldn't do it.

What, and stop Nickhole from endlessly racking up billables? Every time this dumb faggot says something new about Monty, Randazza's cash register just goes ka-ching.

An obtrusive thought bubbled up last night as I was driving home from work: the 5k subscriber gift.

Don't forget the knives he was supposedly going to auction off for Vic. How many years has it been?

Nick isn't even just lazy. He's a fucking THIEF.

For extra credit, he even misrepresented and directly lied about things he had said. In particular repeadly misrepresenting the defaming comments themselves.

And not just that, but he arguably defamed the judge trying the case too. At least he made gross anatomical slurs about her. I mean possibly it wasn't defamation because the weird shit he said was so drug-addled and incomprehensible nobody has yet figured out what he was even trying to say in his altered state.

 

[Captain Manning]

"Your honor, Mr. Quest cannot prove he's not a pedophile, therefore, checkmate Monty"

This reminds me. Nick DID try something similar. From the lawsuit OP:

He said as much on stream. (Paraphrased) 'I don't have evidence that he is NOT a paedo. All these people said for years that he was, and that gives me a good reason to think so. Monty, show me proof otherwise'.

It was insanity, and the thread had a few pages with jollies about 'Show me proof you are not a cuck, Nick.'

It feels like that was a much simpler time. Now it's "show us the bodycam, Nick." All the way up to Null himself.

Like, I get it, it's a criminal case, and the burden is on the government to prove things, but in the public sphere Nick still expects people to prove negatives, but he does not apply that standard to himself.

I literally nearly flew into a rage every time I even saw that guy talking. Binger I mean. My blood pressure went up. From the outcome, I think the jury felt the same. That dude is one of the sleaziest, greasiest pieces of lying shit I've ever seen in my life, and I just already automatically detest prosecutors. They are the worst people in the world. People who do criminal defense for fucking child rapists are better people.

Well, the judge certainly didn't like him. That dressing down Binger got was the second best part of the trial. Second only to the part with the prosecution witness admitting Kyle was acting in self-defense.

 

[Smithfield Ham]

Nick failed a piss test?

 

[Reverend]

Here is a complete PDF copy of all requests received by the Kandiyohi County regarding the Rekietas. Have fun. I'm still processing it.

Shoutout to Josiah Munoz.
Wyświetl załącznik 6278595

Also shoutout to EWU. "WHAT'S NEW EWU CREWWWWWWWW??? Today we've got a SPINE CHILLING case of CHILD NEGLECT that will make you SICK."

edit: hopefully this one actually attached
edit2: lemme unfuck this sec.

https://files.catbox.moe/wi5l3j.zip

EWU is an amazing channel and the stories they have are far better detailed than 90% of the true crime garbage on streaming services.
This is going to be exciting!

 

[SargonF00t]

Nick's whole schtick, and it becomes blindingly transparent once you see it, is to pull his shitty, faggy Vlad the Implier trick until you point out what he just said, and then he sucks a gigantic dick and then says "I never said that."

And that's the time his smug fucking face needs a fist on it.

When a mafia goon says to a shopkeeper "this is a nice business you got here, would be a shame if something were to happen to it", is the mafia goon not making a threat.

According to Cuckieta's logic, the mafia goon could say I never made any threats and we would all have to believe him.

 

[AnOminous]

When a mafia goon says to a shopkeeper "this is a nice business you got here, would be a shame if something were to happen to it", is the mafia goon not making a threat.

According to Cuckieta's logic, the mafia goon could say I never made any threats and we would all have to believe him.

At least when a Mafia goon pulls the protection racket thing, you're probably not getting robbed by any other criminals.

But if Cuckieta promises to auction off some knives or give you a 5K g(R)ift, it's a lie and he's just stealing your money, like the worthless lying THIEF he is.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

But if Cuckieta promises to auction off some knives or give you a 5K g(R)ift, it's a lie and he's just stealing your money, like the worthless lying THIEF he is.

This is why it always cracks me up when Nick gets all self-righteous about how disappointed he is in “those who know my character” and won’t support him publicly. Nigger, everyone who knows your character knows you’re a fucking dirtbag liar who shamelessly deceives, steals and glazes your own cock whenever possible.

 

[This Machine Milks Cows]

And not just that, but he arguably defamed the judge trying the case too. At least he made gross anatomical slurs about her. I mean possibly it wasn't defamation because the weird shit he said was so drug-addled and incomprehensible nobody has yet figured out what he was even trying to say in his altered state.

I am ready for trash cans here. When he said that Judge Fischer had liquor coming from her vagina, wasn't he calling her a lesbian?

Vagina liquor = pussy liquor = pussy licker.

That seems like his kind of funny, weird and silly humour.

It's such a weird, funny and silly thing to say otherwise.

 

[HONKHONKTIME]

Montegraph is the Afghanistan of uh....all this bullshit we follow.

 

[Maraschino]

To get the copcams, does it really matter if Nick said it explicitely or not?

What do we know of what Nick has said?

-He has said that he has talked to numerous people in private.
-After the fact, several of those people have claimed that there is a police conspiracy.
-In addition, one of the people he has talked to publicly (Chrissie), after hearing Nick speak, asked if he was saying the police planted drugs in his home, to which he states he didn't say that.
-In his stream leaking the messages from Null, he states he explicitly avoided saying the police were trying to plant drugs in his home, which is an odd thing to go out of your way to mention, unless you're speaking too much.

The question, therefore, is why would he say that? And my answer is very simple. Nick, with his legal training, is going out of his way to suggest conspiracy to his friends without saying it is conspiracy, because if he overtly states it is conspiracy, those statements can be used to justify releasing the bodycam footage, and those statements have more weight when the person being charged (himself) states it, not just his friends.

It has happened multiple times, with people who have spoken in private, and at least one person in public. A reasonable person hears Nick speak and understands his implications, and his "I didn't say that" cope doesn't work when multiple different people all come to the exact same conclusion. If reasonable people all hear Nick's words and then see him say he's explicitly not saying something, but people keep coming to the same conclusion, you can't make the defense you didn't at the very minimum suggest something because it's obvious you didn't want to say it overtly. You going out of your way to mention you did not say something but coming to a specific conclusion leads an average person to understand you are trying your fucking best to suggest a particular conclusion without saying it out loud so that you as a person with legal training can state (accurately, but disingenuously) that you didn't say something, and it sounds like shitty lawyer word games when you do it...and it's because it is shitty lawyer word games.

"You were found with cocaine in your house."
"It's not mine."
"So how did it get there?"
"Do you know what the police bring into your home?"

If you read the above conversation (probably eerily close to what Nick has stated in private to his friends), you get the immediate assumption that if he's telling the truth, then his explanation for the events is that police brought cocaine into his house, because he wouldn't go out of the way to bring it up unless he wants to plant the idea. If he's telling the truth and he is being framed, it deserves to be investigated, and if he isn't (he's not), it deserves to be investigated.

I don't think Nick has to say it for it to matter. I think it's possible that Nick trying to talk to other people to get them to say it could be enough. At least he isn't an obnoxious asshole that has been going out of the way to be as difficult as possible to deal with while driving away damn near everyone in his life so there's no incentive for his local government to agree that maybe the footage should be released, after all.

Because that shit would be embarrassing.

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

When he said that Judge Fischer had liquor coming from her vagina, wasn't he calling her a lesbian?

Maybe. My line of thinking was going "everyone sucks up to her in the local court system, like she has whiskey for pussy juice"
Because he is a drunken wastrel and can't comprehend someone being respected unless sucking up and booze is involved.

 

[AnOminous]

I am ready for trash cans here. When he said that Judge Fischer had liquor coming from her vagina, wasn't he calling her a lesbian?

When you're a cuck, you really don't get to make sexual insults about anyone, because you are literally the lowest form of human existence.

 

[Swole McPole]

He could have easily done a rocks glass with his logo on it

New Nick should do a glass pipe for smoking rocks with his logo on it. How expensive could a few hundred pyrex stems with a Rekeita Law transfer on the side be?

 

[Gorton Colu]

Nick is just a retard. Trying to figure out his 'jokes' is fun, but futile for it presupposes that Nick is not a vessel for a smoothed out Swiss cheese brain.

Also, Nick should just say he donated the Locals gift to charity and give everyone the finger. No one except true nimrods believe his bullshit anyway. Go big.

 

[Captain Manning]

I am ready for trash cans here. When he said that Judge Fischer had liquor coming from her vagina, wasn't he calling her a lesbian?

Possibly, but I wil note she was married to a man named Stephen, with her divorce from him being finalized in 2022. You can find that on MCRO if you're interested. So I am guessing it's unlikely she is a lesbian. Unless you wanna argue she is, but married a man anyways.



I think it's like the Denny's joke all over again. Trying to make sense of it is futile.

Remember, Nick looks up to Dick Masterson. A man who seems to believe comedy never advanced beyond calling women fat.

The difference is, when Dick tells a joke, people roll their eyes. When Nick tells a joke, people scratch their heads. Dick's jokes are comprehensible but stupid. Nick's are incomprehensible and stupid.

 

[Pelican Bones]

I hate to break it to everyone, but Nick doesn't have any points to his jokes. The absolute extent of his comprehension of humor is shock/offense, non-sequiturs, and racism. He just blabbers shit stream-of-conscious style and hopes something will land. If the joke doesn't land, he'll just force it until it's awkward and then pretend that the awkwardness was the joke.

The worst thing that ever happened to Nick and his family was him going online and having someone think he was funny. It's what lead him to where he is today.

 

[genericwhitemale]

I am ready for trash cans here. When he said that Judge Fischer had liquor coming from her vagina, wasn't he calling her a lesbian?

Vagina liquor = pussy liquor = pussy licker.

That's far too smart for Rekeita

 

[John Andrews Stan]

The only thing stupider than Nick’s attempts at jokes is trying to figure out what the fuck the drunk is talking about. Your time would be better spent doing literally anything else. And this thread would be better off quiet than filled with this horseshit.