💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
one of the more telling things

Drex bailed. Grooming and trashy behavior aside, Drex had a limit and took it. I assume drex has seen or understood drug use.

Drexel is a coward by nature. He goes on about how he "adapts" to situations, but his method remains the same.

Hiding from family court, claiming to have nothing in his name (the house he lives in and even his YouTube channel), and everything goes to his brother (claims to not have been served since 2012 though he was sent to collections in 2015). Drexel lives in fear.

Same with avoiding his own mother as well as nuking his server as an epic win over Kiwi Farms. Drexel isn't Nick's friend so much as a partner in crime. This one-note wonder from the Manosphere has never been capable of really standing up for himself where it counts.

So, Nick is in trouble? Never fear. Brave Sir Drexel is here to "adapt" to the situation:

 
Nah, what he really *wanted* to say was that Null is the leader of a gang of online paedophiles who like sucking little boy's dicks.

Sadly for us, Steve 'Montegraph' Quest has taught him that defaming people on line -- like snorting coke when you're streaming -- can have very expensive consequences and can fuck with your life in ways that you might never have been able to imagine.

Who would have thought that Montegraph would have been the person to school Rekieta on the consequences of breaking the law?
I had a good laugh at his "look how many people Null calls pedophiles" bit. Especially since he had to drop in that "it's projection". But it's not the same since he didn't say it outright!!
 
The fact he instantly retreated to constitutional arguments, rather than anything of actual substance, shows signs of desperation.
Barnes is one of those people who believes that the constitution means whatever he chooses to see in it when he reads it. You see that approach among many libertarians. They reject everything including literal original intent and all court precedent back to day one in favor of their own personal ideas.

He isn't stupid. He is just promoting a theory of law that is equal to total anarchy.

Thus is how Reddit atheist argue: Doesn't God says somewhere to love people? That means that no matter what else He says, you can't do anything that makes me angry because I decide what 'love' is.

Nick does the same with his heresy as he does with the law. It has a thin veneer of deep learning as you cite one of the basic principles, but when you fail to move past the basics, it just shows that you are shallow.

My artistic interpretation of the Rekieta's arrest.

Wyświetl załącznik 6293591

Missing ceiling cats. 9/10.

The Balls vs No Balls thing was a long time joke in his chat going back to Weeb Wars.

It just goes to show that the Anime "Degenerates" will make jokes about shit but don't really care for Drug Induced Polycules because they are the ones that left after Nick started to chase Wine Aunt pussy on Locals.

I think they left when he called them 'incels'.
 
Rekieta is fine with challenging and talking about the drug thing and the bodycam footage etc. but has anybody confronted him on livestream about letting Aaron have sex multiple times with his WIFE ? That's the one thing I have not heard him talk about yet, I would like to hear if there is some CRAZY story how that actually did not happen at all
When he gets pressed his go to is"You couldn't possibly know."
Otherwise he tries to play it off with fake oblivious" I dunno, you should ask them".
Many such cases when pressed about April still living with him.
 
Nick is in an elite club with Ethan Ralph for men who have lost custody with their kids and are actively on friendly terms with self-confessed pedophiles (Vito). The guy's a loser and the only interesting thing about hearing him fellate his own supposed intelligence with weasel words is the desperation of behavior because he knows his credibility is totally shot.
 
That was actually my point, though. Barnes and his minions have pointed to nothing about the facial validity of the warrant.

My point was simply that the fact they actually did find cocaine (something I love to point out again and again) is irrelevant to a FACIAL challenge to the sufficiency of probable cause for the warrant, which they had PLENTY OF.

There are several steps the state needs to prosecute possession. Probable cause for the search is merely one of them.

I am not driving at all! I am TRAVELING, as I am allowed to do under the Magna Carta! AND the Uniform Commercial Code. Checkmate atheists!
Would love a poll asking if we think nick will go full sovereign citizen.
That would be highly entertaining
 
Nick is in an elite club with Ethan Ralph for men who have lost custody with their kids and are actively on friendly terms with self-confessed pedophiles (Vito). The guy's a loser and the only interesting thing about hearing him fellate his own supposed intelligence with weasel words is the desperation of behavior because he knows his credibility is totally shot.
He got his kids back stalker child
Enjoy prison
 
Ya think?

It's an uphill battle to argue there existed no probable cause when the cops find the very items that they were looking to find as described in the warrant.

What? Did they just make a super fucking lucky guess there was dope at Casa de Balldo?

The first step in defense for a client is to avoid having to defend anything - i.e. have all the results of the search deemed invalid. And, it has happened where a guilty client - even murderers, drug king pins and rapists - were unable to be prosecuted because the probable cause of the search warrant that obtained the evidence was deemed unacceptable with errors or based on grounds that did not pass muster.

For Nick, there will be no accepting anything as fate, a plea or a given until he has extinguished any and all avenues to have the search warrant deemed invalid. Given that they knew he was a lawyer and had some weight and wasn't a regular Joe, they likely ensured the Search Warrant was airtight and on point as other more informed and better educated KFers have pointed out. If it is made invalid, they've got nothing on him and this entire episode is pretty much over for him.

I do look forward to Nick's disappointment in this, that in itself, will make a fine moment as that candle of hope is extinguished. Bookmark that day because the clouds and doom of reality will fill his skies.
 
I remember someone comparing Barnes to Baby Herman from Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was either on here or Kino Casino. But he really does look like him and the cigar makes it funnier.

Cigar 2.jpeg
 
Nick, do you unironically think I am a pedophile?

Need I remind you of my interests? I have no doubt in my mind I could convince a judge and jury that I like what I like.

I would post my latest piece here but that's a guaranteed ban. (:_(
My dude Nick has PTSD flashbacks every time he sees your name. He stopped reading as soon as he saw it and dropped to the floor burbling "animesuckscopeandsneed" x10.
He's
seeing obese pink farting dragons right now.
 
Because the entire cast of Eva are insufferable cunts. It might be the least likeable cast of characters in television history
I was going to say "Isn't EVA just "insufferable cunts" the anime?" Glad to see I'm not alone.

edit: punctuation
Oh, come on! Even PenPen? PenPen did nothing wrong!

Nick, do you unironically think I am a pedophile?

Need I remind you of my interests? I have no doubt in my mind I could convince a judge and jury that I like what I like.

I would post my latest piece here but that's a guaranteed ban. (:_(
It would be funny if the image he looked at that night were introduced into evidence.

"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client Nick Rekieta was not under the influence of the obviously planted coke that night. That is a vicious lie! That was powdered sugar on his nose, and his behavior that night was attributable to him being sent... THIS!"

*Audible gasps from the courtroom*
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole