💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[DHugo]

MNPublicRecords comes in before/during the stream to felt Nick. Then Nick felts himself by streaming causing a loss of ~1k subscribers every time.
Wyświetl załącznik 6291786
Congrats Nick! I can't wait for the 400k special.

The good old Jim Sterling special. Can you imagine him trooning out?

 

[Strix454]

I still don't understand how Barnes became so trusted and respected.

He became trusted and respected by foolish people through his association with famous people and their cases which often had a political character. He used the Wesley Snipes case to make himself "famous". He also often tells people what they want to hear rather than anything useful. He tends in my opinion to leverage clients for self-promotion.

 

[Musashi's Son]

He became trusted and respected by foolish people through his association with famous people and their cases which often had a political character. He used the Wesley Snipes case to make himself "famous". He also often tells people what they want to hear rather than anything useful. He tends in my opinion to leverage clients for self-promotion.

Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).

 

[AnOminous]

Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).

I think it was because he is a gigantic faggot, but I do think they also rejected his team of clown witnesses as well.

If they'd allowed his parade of clowns, they'd have lost the case and Rittenhouse would now be not enjoying prison.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

I think it was because he is a gigantic faggot, but I do think they also rejected his team of clown witnesses as well.

If they'd allowed his parade of clowns, they'd have lost the case and Rittenhouse would now be not enjoying prison.

I thought he was shown the door after going into the fundraising business for himself.

 

[The Wokest]

and Rittenhouse would now be not enjoying prison.

What? you don't know that... He looks like he'd enjoy it.
he looks like a stalker child.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).

I think it was mentioned by Rittenhouse and one of his lawyers that Barnes wanted to grandstand and possibly make a legal martyr out of Rittenhouse by bringing in a bunch of nonsense constitutional arguments, while the lawyers Kyle eventually chose just wanted to win the case for their client in the cleanest way possible. Barnes only ever saw Kyle as a cause and not as a person.

 

[sixart]

Look, ma, I'm embedding YT!

This family law libertarian guy has the best video thumbnail for Rekieta, even handed review of Nick's crap. He's based in reality of handling loads of cases likes Crackieta

last edit: his video adds nothing and curves away half-way through, but that thumbnail~

 

[Watching Rekieta]

Wyświetl załącznik 6292810

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

It's the texts you covered on 5/31 MATI. I don't see where he said evidence was planted. He carefully words his lies. His rule is that nothing can be inferred about what he says while he infers everything and it's fine. e.g. He spergs about the .22 shell casing and how he never shot his guns. Well, no one accused him of shooting guns. He inferred it. So inference is okay with but only when he does it.

 

[Null]

It's the texts you covered on 5/31 MATI. I don't see where he said evidence was planted. He carefully words his lies. His rule is that nothing can be inferred about what he says while he infers everything and it's fine. e.g. He spergs about the .22 shell casing and how he never shot his guns. Well, no one accused him of shooting guns. He inferred it. So inference is okay with but only when he does it.

It doesn't have to be a direct statement, it just has to be a rumor that exists. Chrissy obviously seems under the impression that the evidence may be planted.

Someone else sent another clip from the Chrissy video I've added.

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.

 

[Lonely khan]

[/QUOTE]

Can you explain why Barnes was dismissed from the Rittenhouse team? I think it had something to do with the defense team not accepting Barnes's witnesses (or it could be something else entirely not sure).

Part of Barnes pretrial media blitz was having Kyle go to a kenosha bar (while Kyle was underage) and take some selfies with the local MAGA Patriots.

No being underage in the daytime in WI is a gigantic nothing, as you are allowed in bars with a parent before 8 or 10 pm (been about 10 years since I lived in kenosha) but the idea of immediately having him cosy up to the MAGA crowd was bad optics since the media narrative was "maga retard kills blacks" even though the reality was "Retard kills non black retards".

Behind the scenes the rumor was Barnes was creating offshoot arguements about 2-A that would have derailed the proceedings into a 2-A tangent for president setting and appeals as opposed to just winning the 1st degree murder charge.

His professional attorneys were able to drop the long rifle charge as it didn't actually meat the criteria for the statute; Kyle was under 18 but the rifle was not the proper length. So that one just got dismissed outright, which set the table for the 1st degree to be called in question.

Wisconsin has 1st degree murder laws that can circumvent intent if you are doing something needlessly reckless. So you can get a 1st degree murder charge for drunk driving as WI considers the act of driving drunk as so careless that you can derive intent from just the action. Without illegally being there with the weapon the 1st degree murder charges were overreaching. Barnes would have made a bigger spectacle out of a simple dismissed charge, and it was obvious Barnes was clout lawyering as opposed to focusing on the case.

TLDR When the MAGA sing along at the bar came out Barnes was shuffled aside for his retarded optics and aspirations beyond the case.

 

[Redhook]

I know you've been diplomatic in how you've spoken about your contact with Nick, but if he's resorted to disseminating private DM's to use against you then he's well and truly opened the door to have any and all of the texts released, if you're in the mind to do that.

I would never consider a DM to be private. They’re always fair game as are text messages and any other written communications.

 

[OrionBalls]

I would never consider a DM to be private. They’re always fair game as are text messages and any other written communications.

People who display their intimate conversations to win arguments over the Internet have very strange priorities, and shouldn't be trusted.

 

[AnOminous]

I think it was mentioned by Rittenhouse and one of his lawyers that Barnes wanted to grandstand and possibly make a legal martyr out of Rittenhouse by bringing in a bunch of nonsense constitutional arguments, while the lawyers Kyle eventually chose just wanted to win the case for their client in the cleanest way possible. Barnes only ever saw Kyle as a cause and not as a person.

The plodding, boring course was simply to present it as what it was, a clearcut case of self-defense, not to turn it into some giddy crusade over bullshit. And that worked.

People who display their intimate conversations to win arguments over the Internet have very strange priorities, and shouldn't be trusted.

A lawyer is someone who can be trusted with a confidence.

This cunt has done the "Dear John" stream where he betrayed a confidence for literally no reason other than he was assblasted, and now he's done the same with Jersh, but in an extremely bizarre way where he himself was the one doing the "shower call" and somehow thinks disclosing the DMs that completely confirm Jersh's summary of them is an own. I'm completely baffled at what logic made this coke-addled faggot think that was somehow a win.

Who would consider such a completely unreliable douchebag worthy of a confidence?

 

[Captain Manning]

Sounds like the perfect Libertarian party candidate.

Possibly but, fortunately, we have a safeguard called the general election.

"I never insinuated or called anyone a pedophile, It is youuu, Josh, who called somebody pedophiles"

BTW, in addition to him being a drunken idiot in general, I immediately thought of Vito when he said that.

Null is very careful about accusing people of being pedos. He does in Vito's case, because Vito openly admitted to being one. Null being truthful about Vito gets under Dick's skin, and Nick does whatever Dick wants.

Just for 100% clarity, are you saying because he afterwards tried to snake his way out if it saying that'a not what he meant when he called out avatars loli avatars?

Cause mines a man in his 30s.

Mine is his ass with the bottle sticking out of it.

I can understand why he might not appreciate that, but calling it loli would be a weird cope.

 

[I AM RETARDED!]

I still don't understand how Barnes became so trusted and respected.

I'm just impressed he managed to convince so many people he actually a competent lawyer.

 

[Yik]

Okay, so I've got three big things so far. Keep in mind I am specifically exploring rumors regarding activity of the police officers which could be clarified by bodycam footage.

• Yellow Flashs's messages where he denies owning a .22 firearm,.
• Barnes and Frei outright accusing Officer Pomplun specifically of conspiring against Rekieta to protect their corrupt small town.
• Chrissy Mayr's clip where Rekieta says "you don't know what a cop brings into your house either", then backtracks it on confrontation.

Are there any other major points related to the day the search was executed? Was Aliesha Sweep the HHS rep present that day or was it someone else?

After the arrest the position Barnes and Legal Mindset (and others) took and argued for, was that 'the search warrant was unconstitutional.'

This post has the legal mindset stream

ALL OF THESE LAWYERS WHO STREAM OUTSIDE OF A FEW OF THEM WHO ACTUALLY PRACTICE REGULARLY ARE FAILED FUCKING LAWYERS. ANY LAWYER WOULD SAY THIS IS FUCKING BAD!!!


Which is why I said he should actually just kill himself at this point.


LEGAL MINDSET CALLING OUT ALL LAWTUBERS RIGHT NOW SAYING THEY'RE ACTING LIKE BRO'S AND NOT LAWYERS!!!
HAIL MINDSET!!! HE JUST CALLED OUT UNCIVIL INCEL-LAW!!!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0PncJFv5Qk

This post is a summary of LM's description of the violations. Including a repeating of the rumour of police corruption and retaliation.

Constitutional Defenses:
-Nick's defense should be based on the constitutionality of the search warrant and the arrest.

-1st amendment violation:
---Pastor's report should have only caused a wellness check, not a search warrant.
---Week delay in search is suspicious.
---Mandatory reporting is bad, because it removes pastor/therapist confidentiality.
---Barnes asserts that the raid was retaliation for Nick's criticism of Judge Fischer and the prosecutors.
---He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
---This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.

-2nd amendment violation:
---Why is there a gun charge? He should be allowed to own a gun, and it was in his bedroom not with the kids.
---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Guns should only be taken if you use them while on drugs, not simply possessing them.
---The gun charge and the underlying law itself is unconstitutional.

-4th amendment violation:
---Drug testing violates the 4th amendment.
---Shouldn't be able to get a search warrant, remove the kids, remove guns, just because they found "something" in the search.
---A search based on an anonymous report, hearsay (the priest's report) should not be performed. It's the same thing as swatting.
---Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.

-5th amendment violation:
---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
---Having/using drugs around children is not harm by itself.
---No one witnessed anything bad happen to the kids except that the house was messy.

-6th amendment violation:
---The jail not allowing Nick to see his clients while he was under arrest is a violation of the right to an attorney.
---That Nick wasn't told immediately that April was released is a very bad look for the court.

-8th amendment violation:
---Confiscation of guns should not be a condition of bail, it's excessive and also violates 2nd amendment.
---Bail itself should be unconstitutional.

 

[AnOminous]

After the arrest the position Barnes and Legal Mindset (and others) took and argued for, was that 'the search warrant was unconstitutional.'

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Have they ever presented any reason the warrant itself is somehow unconstitutional on its face? Because if they did, I missed it. Just jabbering and gibbering that it is doesn't count. It appears to present vastly more than adequate probable cause, which is all it needs to do. What is the supposed constitutional deficiency in it?

This foppish popinjay has presented no arguments whatsoever to support this ludicrous claim.

Of course he also idiotically claimed that bail is unconstitutional.

That's just hand-wavy defense lawyer bullshit to take your mind off the pile of cocaine they found in his bedroom.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

If there's also any social media posts that seem genuinely concerned about corruption in the county, I'll accept those. I've already archived about a dozen.

Working on a way to archive them, but Nick clicked on a handful of Instagram comments speculating there was some wrongdoing by the police.

Obvious promotion of the grand cop conspiracy theory by Rekieta can be seen in the Instagram comments he likes on his posts. These are clearly indicated by “ by author” above the comment.

He is liking, and implicitly supporting/agreeing with, comments that are basically saying “you were framed by the cops!!!” So funny and weird that he is trying to backtrack on this when it’s so obvious.

Wyświetl załącznik 6292067Wyświetl załącznik 6292068Wyświetl załącznik 6292069

Spoiler: Bonus: “listen to Barnes”

Wyświetl załącznik 6292074Wyświetl załącznik 6292075

(Sorry, I don’t know of a way to archive these because Instagram is awful.)

ETA: One interesting comment from Lord Balldo himself:

Wyświetl załącznik 6292166

“I’m not gonna say I was framed, but uh, you should totally talk to the people who are saying it. wink wink”