💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wyświetl załącznik 6271150

Hear ye, hear ye. It is the 4th day of August in year 2024 since the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. I have been contacted by King Balldo through a series of ropes and pulleys and given a missive. In accordance with the Unspoken Agreement, the body of such missive will be presented as accurately as possible without direct copies, thereby granting the benefit of a doubt that I am simply making this all up.

Sir Rekieta finds it necessary to impart the following upon the undeserving and unwashed masses.
  • Sir Rekieta dearly wishes the footage may be made available, however, due to the court order in the CHIPS case, as a result of a request he filed himself, discovery is sealed.
  • Sir Rekieta states that consenting to such a release would make him look irresponsible in the eyes of the court, revealing intimates of his home for the benefit of only an evil doxing website, which the court would not find amusing.
  • Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars', which makes us even less deserving of seeing the divine footage. I will allow the absurdity of such a statement sit as it is.
  • Sir Rekieta would like to inform everyone that they are retarded and that the children will be returned (though I think almost immediately into the thread, people with hands on experience working for state CPS have said that children almost always are returned the homes barring extraordinary abuse cases, because a household must be a true horror show to be worse than 'the system', and I also don't really think the prevailing winds of the thread have been against him ever having custody again, especially supervised custody).
HEREBY ENTERED INTO RECORD.
Totally not reading his thread and totally not seethe watching any of the streams about him because he's entirely too busy.
 
It's one of those cases where I hate to defend CPS, which is full of lunatics and sociopaths, a fairly large number of absolutely burned-out former idealists who have completely lost their faith in humanity, and a few rare people who have maintained their sanity enough to try to do good.
On a scale of no big deal, to wanting to slit your own throat just to stop the nightmares. the Rekieta CPS case is one that any sane CPS worker would love to have. Most CPS cases are not something that you put a quick fix to and wrap all up with a happily-ever-after bow. These cases stay on your desk for years, often generations, and all you do is document, document, document, until the suffering of children becomes just so many words on the computer monitor. The people who survive being a caseworker are those who realize that they cannot save anyone. They can only try to mitigate and minimize the damage. Like law enforcement personnel, you will see the worst that humanity has to offer; the difference being that you see it happen to children and you are expected to fix it. And you will see unimaginable horrors again and again and again.
Sadly, no matter how we may feel about how Nick and Kayla parented their children, in the big, horrible picture of CPS cases, the Rekieta children are lucky. They have a beautiful home, extended family that love them, strong community ties and they come from a privileged socio-economic class. They may not feel like it now, but the children have been empowered and now will be in communication with, and under scrutiny from, extended family, medical practitioners and the State. The children are safer now than they have ever been, because harmful family secrets have been exposed. I cannot know what their GAL's investigation is revealing, but from what I have read and surmised, I do believe it is in the children's best interest to return to their home and some semblance of normalcy, and that their parents continue to be closely monitored. School should start soon, which I think may speed up the timeline for the children being re-integrated into their home.
Nick and Kayla have been thrown a lifeline; for the sake of their kids, I hope they grab hold.
 
Nick was trying to say that the art piece was the explanation for the loose ammunition found in his room, because said ammunition was part of said art piece.
He's really thinking he's winning because he has an explanation for the ammunition, and not the fucking cocaine, which he now is of the opinion he "doesn't believe necessarily was in his house".
Soo.. we may now have to accept that there is an explanation, albeit a somewhat shaky one from the mouth of Nick Rekieta, for the single loose shell casing that doesn’t fit any of his guns.

BIG FUCKING WOW NICK YOU SPASTIC, WHO CARES???

Nobody here was in agreement about its significance anyway, the “brown brown” theory was pretty far out, and at the end of the day it just doesn’t matter other than being one small item to the overall terrible looking scene.
 
Well, the bodycam footage becomes public if they go to trial. If in Rekieta's mind he can deny Null and KF the body cam by going to prison, he'll do it. He'll become spitecow seething in prison about how his fight for privacy for all of us was worth it. He's fighting cancel culture for us!
Nick would enjoy prison. He’d be the prison bitch lawyer and everyone would come to him to rape him because he’s too much of a stick to fight back because he could help them with their cases.
 
Instead, Nick decided that he's smarter than everyone else, that going "Nuh huh you didn't see me snorting the drugs so the law doesn't apply to me" is enough, and that sacrificing his kids wellbeing, stability, and mental health, is an OK price to pay for his right to keep his throuple alive (because Rekieta knows that if there are no more drugs, April won't have as much reason to stay).
Idiots like Nick are exactly why you have laws like drugs+guns+children=endangerment/neglect.

He can say that shit all he likes. It literally doesn't matter. He could have just been a cocaine collector because he thought it looked pretty. The law doesn't give a flying fuck.
It's all so fucking smarmy, the "well the piss test was negative so he must be clean" tactic (which only proves that, at best, he hasn't done coke in the last 4 days) , the objection by Rekieta wanting to pretend he is a real lawyer, the attempts to frame it as if the agency wasn't doing everything possible to reunite the kids with the parents, just all of it.
If he thinks he's fooling anyone with that bullshit he's delusional. They know exactly why he's doing the piss tests instead of the hair tests. And it's because he wants to keep doing drugs. He thinks he's being clever but he's being an absolute retard.
 
He thinks he's being clever but he's being an absolute retard.
Ironically he might have avoided this particular brand of moronism if he'd actually taken up that Scandinavian Prude's offer to defend crackheads way back when. Then he'd quickly learn that people working in the system have heard it all already. They get on-the-job masterclasses from people who are authentic geniuses at being junkie subhumans. To think that he, a whitebread nobody, is going to be able to snow the court with his pure intellect and creative writing degree is utter ignorance.
 
firefox_BU1uTB4n0s.png
@Justa Grata Honoria please say it was a misclick
 
You can game urine tests pretty easily depending on what test they are doing. Even just diluting your sample by over-hydrating (a lot of Gatorade and pedialyte) and then taking a diuretics can work. If Nick ever defended a drug addict (he has in the county) then he possibly knows what brand they use and then it’s just a looking up how to cheat it on Reddit.

I’ve done Urinalysis work and it does depend on how much they care. A basic dipstick (dip stick in urine either wait a set amount of time or put it in a machine that reads it for you. They aren’t going to do what they do for boxing where you’ll get a spin down and test that.
 
You can game urine tests pretty easily depending on what test they are doing. Even just diluting your sample by over-hydrating (a lot of Gatorade and pedialyte) and then taking a diuretics can work. If Nick ever defended a drug addict (he has in the county) then he possibly knows what brand they use and then it’s just a looking up how to cheat it on Reddit.

I’ve done Urinalysis work and it does depend on how much they care. A basic dipstick (dip stick in urine either wait a set amount of time or put it in a machine that reads it for you. They aren’t going to do what they do for boxing where you’ll get a spin down and test that.
IMG_9532.jpeg
They also sell this, which comes with a hand warmer packet to keep it at body temperature.
Quick Fix Plus

IMG_9534.jpeg
You can even buy a fake cock to “piss” for you if you suspect they want to watch as you go.
The Whizzinator

Assuming Nick can refrain from destroying it in a fit of seething jealousy.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Soo.. we may now have to accept that there is an explanation, albeit a somewhat shaky one from the mouth of Nick Rekieta, for the single loose shell casing that doesn’t fit any of his guns.

BIG FUCKING WOW NICK YOU SPASTIC, WHO CARES???

Nobody here was in agreement about its significance anyway, the “brown brown” theory was pretty far out, and at the end of the day it just doesn’t matter other than being one small item to the overall terrible looking scene.
Him admitting they found a spent casing from the art piece only proves the police actually searched his house and not went straight to his bedroom to plant the drugs.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6271150

Hear ye, hear ye. It is the 4th day of August in year 2024 since the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. I have been contacted by King Balldo through a series of ropes and pulleys and given a missive. In accordance with the Unspoken Agreement, the body of such missive will be presented as accurately as possible without direct copies, thereby granting the benefit of a doubt that I am simply making this all up.

Sir Rekieta finds it necessary to impart the following upon the undeserving and unwashed masses.
  • Sir Rekieta dearly wishes the footage may be made available, however, due to the court order in the CHIPS case, as a result of a request he filed himself, discovery is sealed.
  • Sir Rekieta states that consenting to such a release would make him look irresponsible in the eyes of the court, revealing intimates of his home for the benefit of only an evil doxing website, which the court would not find amusing.
  • Sir Rekieta would like to point out that I 'fled the country for unknown reasons', and that the Kiwi Farms is a bunch of 'loli avatars', which makes us even less deserving of seeing the divine footage. I will allow the absurdity of such a statement sit as it is.
  • Sir Rekieta would like to inform everyone that they are retarded and that the children will be returned (though I think almost immediately into the thread, people with hands on experience working for state CPS have said that children almost always are returned the homes barring extraordinary abuse cases, because a household must be a true horror show to be worse than 'the system', and I also don't really think the prevailing winds of the thread have been against him ever having custody again, especially supervised custody).
HEREBY ENTERED INTO RECORD.
Rekieta: Coke possession? No biggie, kids will be returned in two weeks.

Also Rekieta: Agreeing to releasing footage of his 5 figure crackden? YOU CRAZY?! That is so IRRESPONSIBLE!!! Kids will never return home!!
 
Wyświetl załącznik 6272288
They also sell this, which comes with a hand warmer packet to keep it at body temperature.
Quick Fix Plus

Wyświetl załącznik 6272300
You can even buy a fake cock to “piss” for you if you suspect they want to watch as you go.
The Wizzinator

Assuming Nick can refrain from destroying it in a fit of seething jealousy.
They test for fake piss now. I've witnessed too many salesmen get violated using it. "They have a money back guarantee" My response: "Do they offer to do the time as a guarantee?"
 
He's a control freak and the smartest guy in every room, so being a defendant in a criminal jury trial is possibly the most unbearable situation imaginable. Plus, he has no defense that any jury would possibly buy. If the drugs don't get suppressed for a bad warrant (they won't), then he's taking a plea. If he goes to trial, then he's legitimately insane.
The thing is: Nick legit thinks he’s a world class bullshitter. (He’s also likely high off coke and investing in the priciest wizzinator urine tester fake dick money can get.)

I could totally see him, against the advice of his lawyer, take it to trial because he’s convinced the jury will buy an über retarded: “Sure there was coke. I have no idea how it got there, and the state didn’t prove that I put it there. You must acquit!”-argument.
 
They test for fake piss now. I've witnessed too many salesmen get violated using it. "They have a money back guarantee" My response: "Do they offer to do the time as a guarantee?"
You are better off trying to game it by going clean for a bit and trying to pee it out of your system via the method I mentioned. Just drink pedialyte, take a diuretic, and take a walk or use a sauna.
 
I think you have it backward. In a deferred adjudication, he pleads guilty and admits he committed the crime. He eats the felony. The judge then defers the sentencing with the possibility that it's dismissed in a few years. But for the prosecutor, it's a guilty felony conviction.

Importantly, Rekieta admits his guilt in open court.

An Alford plea is that he doesn't admit guilt. It's much rarer. He is much less likely to get an Alford plea after antagonizing the prosecutor and accusing them of crimes. The prosecutor is going to require he admit guilt and be unable to assert innocence in the future and that happens with a deferred adjudication plea.

An alford plea would also allow him to appeal. Deferred adjudication plea removes appeals. Barnes getting an Alford plea would be amazing. Deferred adjudication after guilty plea is much more likely to be offered.
A deferred adjudication does mean admitting guilt in open court but the conviction isn't entered, and if you complete probation or whatever then it gets dismissed with no conviction. Only if the person violates probation does a deferred adjudication result in a conviction.

Alford pleas aren't some kind of sweetheart deal. They make sense in a few particular circumstances. Deferred adjudications are a get-out-of-a-felony-conviction-by-doing -probation card. So I guess it depends on priorities, but for most people admitting guilt without becoming a convicted felon is better than becoming a convicted felon who kept his ability to maintain innocence.

Also, you can't appeal nonjurisdictional defects (illegal searches and such) on a deferred adjudication or an Alford plea. Only appeals from convictions at trial and conditional pleas (Minnesota's version is named after some case) let you appeal those issues.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole