Science Women who rarely have sex are at an increased risk of dying, study finds - Female users of Kiwifarms most affected

A recent study, based on data from the 2005–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), has found that women who rarely engage in sexual activity have a 70% higher risk of dying compared to those who have sex at least once per week. Additionally, individuals with depression who had sex much less than once per week had a 197% higher risk of dying than those who had sex around once per week. These findings were published in the Journal of Psychosexual Health.

Frequent sex has been shown to offer numerous health benefits. It helps reduce stress and improve mood through the release of endorphins and oxytocin. It can also boost the immune system, making the body more resistant to infections and illnesses.

Regular sexual activity promotes cardiovascular health by increasing heart rate and circulation. It enhances sleep quality due to the release of the hormone prolactin, which is associated with relaxation. Frequent sex can also improve intimacy and strengthen relationships, contributing to overall emotional well-being.


A previous study highlighted that the critical frequency of sex seems to be one intercourse per week when relationship duration, gender, and age are considered. Frequencies greater than once per week do not appear to produce greater well-being outcomes, but there is a significant difference in well-being between individuals having sex once per week and those having it less frequently.

Another study reported that decreased sexual activity was related to adverse health outcomes for both men and women, and a relationship between erectile dysfunction and cancer in older men was also found.

The current study, led by Srikanta Banerjee and his colleagues, aimed to explore the relationship between sexual frequency and all-cause mortality, i.e., the likelihood that a person will die. They analyzed data from the NHANES, a program of the National Center for Health Statistics designed to evaluate the health of adults in the United States using consolidated data from interviews and physical exams.


The study sample included 14,542 noninstitutionalized U.S. adults aged between 20 and 59 years, with an average age of 46 years. The researchers used data on all-cause mortality (whether the study participant died during the follow-up period, by December 2015), depression (measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9), sexual frequency (participants were asked, “In the past 12 months, about how many times have you had vaginal or anal sex?”), obesity, and various demographic factors.

The results showed that younger participants tended to have sex more often. Individuals with low frequencies of sex tended to have elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, an indicator of inflammation, were more likely to have never smoked, to be more educated, and to be depressed. Black participants were slightly more often among those with high sex frequencies, while Hispanic and White participants were more frequent in the group having sex rarely. Overall, 95% of participants aged 20-59 years had sex more than 12 times per year, and 38% had sex more than once per week.

Women who had sex rarely were 70% more likely to have died during the follow-up period compared to women who had sex more often. The researchers examined the link between frequency of sex and death separately among individuals who had sex less often than once per week and those who had it more than once per week.


Among individuals having sex less than once per week, participants with depression and low sexual frequency (i.e., had sex much less than once per week) were 197% more likely to die than those who had depression and high sexual frequency (i.e., had sex once per week or close to that).

When the same analysis was done on individuals having sex more than once per week, there was no association between the frequency of sex and the risk of death. This supports the idea that having sex at least once per week might be critical for achieving the sex-related health benefits.

“In an ethnically diverse population, we found that low sexual frequency can lead to three times increased overall mortality, even after controlling for health and demographic factors. Consistent with our findings, sexual activity is important for overall cardiovascular health possibly due to reduction of heart rate variability and blood flow increase. Public health interventions should be designed taking into consideration sexual health,” the study authors concluded.


The study sheds light on the links between how often a person has sex and the likelihood of dying. However, it is important to note that the study design does not allow for cause-and-effect conclusions. While it is possible that having sex improves health, it is also possible that people in poor health are less able to have sex, creating the association. Additionally, the study did not examine other aspects of sexual health, such as sexual satisfaction or the quality of sexual relationships, which could also play significant roles in overall well-being. Future research could benefit from exploring these additional dimensions of sexual health to provide a more comprehensive understanding.

The study,“Connection Between Depression, Sexual Frequency, and All-cause Mortality: Findings from a Nationally Representative Study,” was authored by Srikanta Banerjee, Peter Anderson, and W. Sumner Davis.

Article: https://www.psypost.org/women-who-rarely-have-sex-are-at-an-increased-risk-of-dying-study-finds/
Archive: https://archive.is/PUaJ7
 
Is this an attempt by a nudge unit to convince me that being fucked by bongistani government over and over again is actually part od their citizen's wellbeing strategy?
 
Wouldn’t the increased lifespan of married couples or couples who live together long term be more likely because of the fact you have another person with an interest in monitoring your health besides yourself?
As far as I recall that benefit only applies to men. Married men live longer, but I’m not sure than married women do.
 
If I fuck every day, will I live forever?

Oh, wait. Only once a week? Either way, we gotta make these studies STUPIDER and MORE FALLACIOUS.

I've got a great idea for the next article: Do people who drink water die more often? Sponsored by Goyslop Type #281!
Don't worry, you'll get to the acceptance phase eventually.
 
I was specifically thinking of this article when I wrote my comment. It also just doesn't pass the sniff test to me - alcohol is pretty fucking terrible for your liver, for example. It's also one of the only drugs where the withdrawals can actually kill you from quitting cold turkey. If you have high blood pressure I'm pretty sure your doctor isn't going to prescribe you beer or wine.
Science journalists, the scourge of scientific inquiry everywhere.

Dr. Stockwell is a member of Movendi International, a rebranding of the the Independent Order of Good Templars, a group which is heavily opposed to alcohol consumption and dates back to the days of prohibition in the US, which they advocated heavily for. You'll find their fingerprints on 90% of these 'debunking studies' - the lion's share of the research agrees on the 'J-curve' and there are always problems with these ideologically-motivated meta analyses. If I recall correctly, the definition of moderate drinking in this one is overly broad, and it is of course a meta-analysis, par for the course when you want to re-crunch numbers to support an ideological agenda.

For example, here are the g/day of alcohol consumption that they used:
1721998177229.png

There are 10 grams of alcohol in a glass of 12.5% ABV wine. So by this study, someone who drank 2 glasses of wine every single day would be classified as a 'low volume' drinker. Someone who drank 4 glasses every single day would be considered 'moderate'. That's very obviously insane, and the numbers were shuffled around precisely to get the results that he wanted. There's a reason that his study disagrees with the vast majority of published literature on the subject.

Tylenol is also terrible for your liver. All of medicine is a balancing game between side effects and desired effects. It actually used to be pretty common for cardiologists to recommend a glass of red wine with dinner to people with blood pressure problems, but because of shoddy research like this they are dissuaded from making such recommendations nowadays. In any case, the side effects of moderate alcohol consumption are nothing compared to drugs like Lipitor (blood pressure) or Vioxx (arthritis), which both had absolutely horrific side effects and were pulled off the market after being prescribed to millions of people.
 
Science journalists, the scourge of scientific inquiry everywhere.
Very low alcohol consumption is probably ok. There are more confounding factors as well , things like the group of TT people tends to include people who don’t drink now but did drink and had terrible problems with it. The other problem is that v low consumption is the kind of ‘small glass. (200ml) or good local red wine with dinner when you’re an Italian living off good food’ model. The VAST majority of Uk drinkers drink like fish.
 
I smell lies. Catholic nuns live a long time.
It's pretty common throughout nature. Female often means sex or die (especially in mammals), for males sex then die. It's hardly strange for that to carry through to humans in some way. For some small mammals, when it's time for lovin' the male becomes a rape zombie who keeps chasing females for a couple days until too much of his body is destroyed to continue living.

Nature is kind of horrible. Successful, but pretty damn evil.
 
Why bitches be so frigid when dey life ride on it?
Women lie and don't wanna admit when they come to the sober realization that their local Chad the narc has fooled them into joining his harem.

Read the cope in almost every single Are We Dating The Same Guy? facebook group. "We didn't have sex! We were in a....uh....situationship. ...and we happened to smash genitals one or four times, after drinking. But that doesn't count, we didn't have sex!"
 
Do cardio once a week offers the same benefits as having sex without the risk of STDs and a long-term commitment.
Lol you think hot chip & lie bitches actually do cardio.

Very low alcohol consumption is probably ok. There are more confounding factors as well , things like the group of TT people tends to include people who don’t drink now but did drink and had terrible problems with it. The other problem is that v low consumption is the kind of ‘small glass. (200ml) or good local red wine with dinner when you’re an Italian living off good food’ model. The VAST majority of Uk drinkers drink like fish.
So you're telling me the 20 beers I've had this week alone is not good for me?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole