Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Looks like the answer to bodycam is... maybe:

I was going to suggest Null might ask Hardin to look into it, for the LOLs. But as there's an 'active' lawsuit it's probably better if Josh stays hands-off.
Russ is a coward and a wuss. He talks a big game, but every time a suitation comes up where he can confront someone else he just stands there and seethes.

He's the embodiment of the saying "if looks could kill," because he's incapable of doing anything more than glare impotently at more powerful men.

Russ won't do anything entertaining here either. If I had to guess he'll have loaded up what he considers his essentials, and abandoned everything else by the time the sheriff gets there.
 
Russ is a coward and a wuss. He talks a big game, but every time a suitation comes up where he can confront someone else he just stands there and seethes.

He's the embodiment of the saying "if looks could kill," because he's incapable of doing anything more than glare impotently at more powerful men.

Russ won't do anything entertaining here either. If I had to guess he'll have loaded up what he considers his essentials, and abandoned everything else by the time the sheriff gets there.
No, Russ did not understand lawsuit/LOL Suit can broke (make finances poor) on both sides not just the other side.
 
The motion to stay has been denied

Wyświetl załącznik 6175314
The fact that county courts can act with alacrity and end their judgements by banging skulls onto their desks like hammers Will never stop being ironic to me, when you compare the federal Court that takes 3 months to decide it needs another half year to resolve the pressing issue to take another 3 months to decide a Motion to Compel the case be moved foreword to the next stage, at which point the next hearing will be docketed 6 months from that point. Maybe. Assuming no appeals that take 12 months to resolve followed by a redocketing and hearing 3 months later. Maybe.
 
Russ won't do anything entertaining here either. If I had to guess he'll have loaded up what he considers his essentials, and abandoned everything else by the time the sheriff gets there.
His ego will force him to post something about it, and he will recover. It's not his first eviction. In 2017, he was evicted for (by his own admission) saying something to his landlord's sister. Exactly what was unknown, but he was able to land on his feet after that.
 
Looks like the answer to bodycam is... maybe:

I was going to suggest Null might ask Hardin to look into it, for the LOLs. But as there's an 'active' lawsuit it's probably better if Josh stays hands-off.

It looks like the request itself is public, but the requestor name is private. The cost seems to be 83 USD per hour of footage plus a 50% fee for redaction, if needed. Any research time is on a sliding scale.

The purpose of my original request was to determine when such bodycam video would be taken so that a request could be made. It looks like you need an incident number or similar to identify it with a date.

Looking forward to the motion to reconsider.

No, it is Motion to Undo the Thing I Didn't Like.
 
What bodycam footage are we talking about? Eviction does not always equal 'sheriff tossing your stuff into the street.' I don't know NV law but he should have a few days at least to gtfo himself.
 
Russ knows he doesn't have a leg to stand on and that the moment the Judge wakes up and rules on anything he's toast for giving the court and defense an address he admits is fake in his exhibit (which showed a bill for East Twain Street) and in emailing Hardin "As for the address, I'd have to know what you plan on serving me with" and his own hooker PAC website using his real address.
greer also filed a certificate of service for the documents that mr. hardin had to file with the utah court on plaintiff russell greer plaintiff russell greer's behalf affirming that he had served the defendants via email: 1720669071793.png

even though, after multiple filings regarding incorrect service via email, greer recently informed mr. hardin that: 1720669275107.png

at this rate, mr. hardin will be serving mr. hardin on greer's behalf simply to ensure proper service.
 
I've seen a lot of cool lawyering from this case. Motion to Undo The Thing That Just Happened. Motion to Complain to the Court I'm Losing. Motion of Affirmation I'm Probably Not Suicidal.

I wonder if now he'll file a Motion to Compel Court to Fund Prostitutes for Relief of Plaintiff's Woes.
 
I've seen a lot of cool lawyering from this case. Motion to Undo The Thing That Just Happened. Motion to Complain to the Court I'm Losing. Motion of Affirmation I'm Probably Not Suicidal.

I wonder if now he'll file a Motion to Compel Court to Fund Prostitutes for Relief of Plaintiff's Woes.

I'll bet Hardin would really like to file a Motion to Strike (Plaintiff with a Shoe).
 
Which Judge? Which court can even rule on a Mandamus Application? Which Jurisdiction is the case actually in?
The Admiralty Court. Hardin should travel (not drive) to wherever he may need to in order to verify that the right flag with the right amount and color of fringe is flown in the courtroom, and the only one versed well enough in vexillology to verify that is none other than Joshua Conner Moon.
 
Which Judge? Which court can even rule on a Mandamus Application? Which Jurisdiction is the case actually in?
Technically the 11th circuit Appeals court if we are being charitable, in order to tell the district judge she can't just transfer back a transferred case. But Null has indicated he's not going to do that because, and I am paraphrasing "fuck that bitch, I don't want her trying the case anyway".

Technically the case can just stay where it is forever at this point. Null doesn't have anything he needs to do under the rules atm, so Greer is the moving party. But Greer is a fucking retard who doesn't know what it is he is supposed to do.

I can think of a few things he COULD do to get this moving, but I don't want to help him.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole