💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Mundane Ralph]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111973
I'm calling it now. Balldo appears.

Impossible. Nick told Ralph he'd get the first interview.

 

[A Piece of Coal]

Impossible. Nick told Ralph he'd get the first interview.

Nick would NEVER lie

 

[Vibralldo]

Impossible. Nick told Ralph he'd get the first interview.

Biggest problem isn't an interview show, and Ralph will agree because it's his daddy Dax's show Rekieta snaked him for.

 

[owed to joy]

Impossible. Nick told Ralph he'd get the first interview.

Not even Nick could be dumb enough to go on stream with pilled out Ralph while he's facing charges....or is he

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Archives: 1st Xeet / 2nd Xeet

He is continuing to "speak" about the juvenile court document @ X btw:


Wyświetl załącznik 6111411

Well he's 100% wrong here. Neglect and endangerment are child abuse in MN.

MN does not have a criminal charge called "child abuse." Criminally, the closest charges are endangerment, neglect, torture, and malicious punishment. They are broad categories and can include a variety of abuses (physical, mental, etc.)

"Child abuse" is defined in the procedural laws:

MN Stat. 630.36 (ISSUES; HOW DISPOSED OF)

§

Subdivision 1.Order.​

The issues on the calendar shall be disposed of in the following order, unless, upon the application of either party, for good cause, the court directs an indictment or complaint to be tried out of its order:


(1) indictments or complaints for felony, where the defendant is in custody;

(2) indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where the defendant is in custody;

(3) indictments or complaints alleging child abuse, as defined in subdivision 2, where the defendant is on bail;

(4) indictments or complaints alleging domestic abuse, as defined in subdivision 3, where the defendant is on bail;

(5) indictments or complaints for felony, where the defendant is on bail; and

(6) indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where the defendant is on bail.

After a plea, the defendant shall be entitled to at least four days to prepare for trial, if the defendant requires it.

Subd. 2.Child abuse defined.​

As used in subdivision 1, "child abuse" means an act which involves a minor victim and which constitutes a violation of section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2231, 609.2242, 609.255, 609.321, 609.322, 609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.377, 609.378, 617.246, or 609.224 if the minor victim is a family or household member of the defendant.

609.78 is the statute under which both Rekietas have been charged for neglect and endangerment.

So: YES, Nick, child abuse has been alleged. You dumb fuck.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

My bet is that the coke told him to own the haters, or maybe he was just drunk (or both).

coke is the name of his evil black ceiling cat I guess

also amazing those tweets. Might as well end each one with "Enjoy prison". I'm glad nick decided to channel the spirit of patrick s bloblinson

 

[TheLastJoestar]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111650

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?

As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.

We all know he's guilty. There's no point in trying to force confessions/answers out of him on social media. Just keep compiling the evidence until it's overwhelming. He's cooked.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Social media EXPERT at work:

 

[DiggieSmalls]

This point is new to me- can anyone point me towards where I can read/see about this? I have gone through the general rekieta thread and don't remember this/I am retarded.

https://kiwifarms.pl/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-16500594

 

[TheLastJoestar]

If it was a negative cocaine test result, that'd be evidence you'd WANT them to have because it helps you. His first answer might as well be "because it was positive, dispshit".

I'd like to point out all of this is completely irrelevant because his 9 year old tested positive for cocaine. Cocaine which was spoted and taken from his house.

he can play as coy as he wants to. He's fucking finished.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Social media EXPERT at work:
Wyświetl załącznik 6112024

Wyświetl załącznik 6112023

Given this man's ability to read the same superchats over and over, and ramble about things in a random access manner, I wonder if he would genuinely think he "reached" 440K subs when he falls to that number.

Might even get a celebration stream.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Social media EXPERT at work:

He's shedding the dead weight. The real fans are lining up to give him superchats about their pets and grandparents.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

I just want to point out that Ethan Ralph over the span of YEARS commented on his legal cases less than Rackets has commented on his in less than a month. Ralph is unironically better at protecting himself legally than Rekieta.

 

[Feyd-Robert Rekieta]

Social media EXPERT at work:
Wyświetl załącznik 6112024

Wyświetl załącznik 6112023

It's never been so over...

 

[genericwhitemale]

Social media EXPERT at work:
Wyświetl załącznik 6112024

Wyświetl załącznik 6112023

So proud of Nicky. He's nearly hit 400,000 subscribers.

 

[break these cuffs]

As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.

The stupid nigger is on the internet all day giving exhibit after exhibit to the prosecution. He could at least post something to attempt to clear his name and turn the tide.

 

[Desktop User2]

As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.

We all know he's guilty. There's no point in trying to force confessions/answers out of him on social media. Just keep compiling the evidence until it's overwhelming. He's cooked.

The state already have his drug test results and inspected his whole home. He´s withdrawing info from the CPS, it has nothing to do with his criminal case.

 

[AnOminous]

As he himself has pointed out, he is charged with possession. I don't see how information about his past drug use or the results of drug tests makes any difference to that one way or the other.

Because it more or less eliminates any reasonable doubt that he didn't know it was there or it was just planted (as if there existed any reasonable doubt anyway).

 

[Mister Friendly Dude]

If he's "not using the coke", then why was there 26g+ of the thing in his house, was he saving it for a friend? Does Nick truly think people are stupid enough to not connect the dots ? (His fans clearly are).

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Relevant videos regarding his aspirational sex dungeon are embedded in the post above.

This one I don't mind newfags asking about too much because it hasn't been talked about in a while