💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Is all that's left of Nick's fanbase a personal Lolcow who's managed to piss off their local government too? The repeated stating of the government "making shit up to persecute him" feels a little projected.
Yes. They're a collection of white trash junkies who hate the cops and local government because they seized their pill stash and busted their ass for driving without a license. They only align with libertarianism because most are older and live in a rural area--if they were zoomers who lived in a city they'd be the usual antifa wastoids. They're like some assholes who live not far from me who are all drug addicts, got their zoomer kids addicted to drugs too, run a crack shack blasting music at midnight on a lot of nights, routinely are getting arrested for shit like driving on revoked license, and get the cops showing up their house a lot. White niggers basically.

People like that are your average balldowasher who overlook this because they live the exact same lifestyle Nick does minus the law degree and trust fund. They wish they could be like Nick and have thousands watching them and get paid for their drug-addled rambling about nothing they do on their own time.
 
Things have gotten to the point where we're now hoping this motherfucker didn't go Ben Thorp. I swear i don't think i've ever seen someone spiral this badly, at least in the "e-celeb" world.
 
This balldo chat from last night just had me roaring with laughter. Without trying to be too misogynist or whatever, women are so dumb lmao.

Especially these true crime watchers, dead end, loser women who have no critical thinking abilities. CRIME SLEUTHIN' FUCKING LOL. "Keep taking care of YOU". It's soo fucking funny oh my god.
Wyświetl załącznik 6103271
It’s not “woman” thing it’s a retard thing, and there’s plenty of male retards baldo-guarding too.
 
I don't think it's women being dumb as much as it is a motherly instinct; an expectation that someone would never put their child in such a dangerous position, and a disbelief that it happened. We already knew Nick was a retard, and I don't want to speak on behalf of anyone else here, but exposing their children to cocaine was not on my bingo card. I will agree the women who superchatted him were retarded and simping hard for the sick fuck, but they don't speak for all of us - by any stretch.
Sure, like I said I'm not really trying to go hard on "women".

The combination of of the account name, the profile picture with the filter, the indignant message, are consistent with a type of woman that seems to exist in unusually high concentrations in his chat. True crime podcast, conservative millennial woman. Who, I would imagine would be the least sympathetic to someone like Nick. This kind of cognitive dissidence exists in men too for certain. I guess the archetype is funny to me.
 
Shudder... "No one but me and Mommy get you, sweetheart"

If not sexual grooming, this is at the very least psychological one. It's not a coincidence he chose a tiny troubled child as his favourite - a little girl who can't control her extremely violent outbursts and has horrific nightmares is incredibly vulnerable. Other children, including her siblings, won't want to be around her if she's this aggressive. But daddy gets you, girl. Daddy understands. You're daddy's favourite.

Insane cult vibes on top of nightmare parenting.
 
I'm not a lawyer and at this point I'm a little lost. Does anyone know definitively if giving coke to children is a crime in Minnesota, and if so which one is it?
It falls under child endangerment.

About 10 years ago a mom was charged for giving her teenaged son medical cannabis to relieve his TBI-related spasms. She eventually cut a deal for a fine but it dragged on for a year. https://m.startribune.com/minn-pot-...-giving-sick-son-medical-marijuana/300183191/
 
If not sexual grooming, this is at the very least psychological one. It's not a coincidence he chose a tiny troubled child as his favourite - a little girl who can't control her extremely violent outbursts and has horrific nightmares is incredibly vulnerable. Other children, including her siblings, won't want to be around her if she's this aggressive. But daddy gets you, girl. Daddy understands. You're daddy's favourite.

Insane cult vibes on top of nightmare parenting.
At the time, I really saw this as Nick being enchanted by his daughter being that kind of 'different person' and loving and accpeting her for those differecnes. I thought it was really sweet, but also weird he clearly held her in much higher regard than his 4 other children, when she wasn't the oldest kid, youngest or the only girl. Any of these 3 and I would say it was typical parent stuff. But fuck now it might actually because Nick saw her as the easiest to control (:_(
 
If there's any justice in the world here's how it should end for Nick Rekieta.
Wyświetl załącznik 6103162
SEAN!! What are you doing SEAN?!!
SEAN!!.jpg
 
At the time, I really saw this as Nick being enchanted by his daughter being that kind of 'different person' and loving and accpeting her for those differecnes. I thought it was really sweet, but also weird he clearly held her in much higher regard than his 4 other children, when she wasn't the oldest kid, youngest or the only girl. Any of these 3 and I would say it was typical parent stuff. But fuck now it might actually because Nick saw her as the easiest to control (:_(
Yeah, it's not uncommon to form a special bond with the child who requires extra work/help (through health or behavioral issues). I remember Nick talking about her and I didn't think it was an issue either, but that was before I noticed that Nick generally doesn't seem to like his kids and is perfectly fine mocking them and complaining about them publicly. So why is she his favourite? And now this one girl who was already standing out because of how he's talked about her vs the rest of kids, is the only one testing positive for coke.

Could be a coincidence, but it's a hell of a coincidence. Five kids.
 
The "best case" (=least dark) scenario I can think is that he was using coke to "medicate" the kid.

We know she was the one with the night terrors, and if Aaron is to be believed, a lot of Rekieta's coping about his coke usage revolved around portraying it as self-medication/stress relief. He's definitely deluded enough to believe he can use drugs to treat his kids himself, who would trust the government/doctors to do it?
 
First thing I thought, if not a mixup at the lab, is that maybe the 9 year old was losing their larger teeth and they used coke to numb the pain. Who knows at this point? Might as well throw it out there with all the other theories.
 
Some Q&A about the cocaine found in Rekieta's 9-year-old child’s hair - an autistic analysis

#1. How long does cocaine stay in one's hair?

One of the first questions I've seen some people asking about was how long cocaine could be detected in someone's hair. I've seen that people already responded to that one, but I thought it was nice to give an answer based on the published literature.

One study about the pharmacokinetics of the disappearance of cocaine from hair after discontinuation of drug use found that it could take about 3-4 months for cocaine abusers' proximal hair to be drug-free. This finding was supported by previously published information in the literature. It's important to note that this finding can vary somewhat with the half-life of your own hair.

1. 3-4 month cocaine hair.png Garcia-Bournissen F, Moller M, Nesterenko M, Karaskov T, Koren G. Pharmacokinetics of disappearance of cocaine from hair after discontinuation of drug use [published correction appears in Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:83] [published correction appears in Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:83. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.001]. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1-3):24-27.


#2. Could we extrapolate the data of the cutoff points from adults to children?

It's important to note that children's hair is different from adults' hair. They differ from adult terminal hair in structure as well as in growth properties. However, considering Rekieta's case, this difference could be ignored, as the hair from children > 3 years can be interpreted in the same way as an adult's hair.

2. hair of young children can be interpreted the same as adults.png Pragst F, Krumbiegel F, Thurmann D, et al. Hair analysis of more than 140 families with drug consuming parents. Comparison between hair results from adults and their children. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;297:161-170. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.039


#3. Was that ACTIVE use or PASSIVE exposure?

That is a more difficult question to answer. Generally, from what I've found, the differentiation of cocaine usage vs. external contamination is based on levels of cocaine > 0.5 ng/mg + its metabolite above a cutoff value. Also, the washout data from the analysis process can be used for this interpretation. We don't have this data yet, so I don't think we can reliably differentiate contamination from active use.

4. differentiation between passive and active.png 4. practical guideline.png
Tsanaclis L, Andraus M, Wicks J. Hair analysis when external contamination is in question: A review of practical approach for the interpretation of results. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;285:105-110. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.028

But one thing to consider is that the levels of cocaine found in the child's hair were reported to be ABOVE 5,000 pg/mg (> 10 times the cutoff value).
WTH highlited.png
So EVEN if it was a finding of external exposure, how can you guarantee that this level of contamination wouldn't implicate that the child ALSO ingested it from other contaminated sources?


# Disclaimer - I have no power level within this topic. I just asked some questions and looked at the literature. Someone with more experience and knowledge within this area probably could raise other answers/questions.

Edit: grammar and clarity.
General discussion and Q&A about the PDF and the tests are best suited for the split thread. All of these questions and opinions already exist here.
Null has asked for limiting the discussion about these tests to the other thread (above). Sorry about posting it here, I forgot about the other thread.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole