🗑️ Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[MNPublicRecords]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

She didn't just test positive, but way hot. 500mg was the cutoff on that hair follicle test. Audryrose's level was over 5000. She just turned 9 years old last week, BTW.

Janny edit: The correct unit is pg/mg, picograms per miligram.

 

[TurdThrower]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

Is that real? "tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious?

 

[feral cat #6385]

Hmmm.... Well Nick did mention "having to keep an eye on a family member." Maybe the kid got into something they shouldn't.

This looks real bad. Caution is advised.

 

[Lorne Armstrong]

Is that real? "tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious?

https://www.nydrugtesting.com/forms/docs/hair%20drug%20panels%20and%20cutoff%20levels.pdf

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges. That kid, barely 9, tested positive for cocaine at 10x the cutoff level. 500pg/mg of hair is the cutoff level. Anything below that is considered a negative result for the purposes of the test. 500-2000pg indicates "low use" or "recreational use". 2000-10000pg indicates "medium use" or "daily/weekends". It's a hair follicle test so it's not like the kid just got into the coke stash one time and got messed up from playing around. Someone was dosing her with the stuff.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

Paging Robert Barnes about the constitutionality of your kids STEALING your coke.

Hmmm.... Well Nick did mention "having to keep an eye on a family member." Maybe the kid got into something they shouldn't.

This looks real bad. Caution is advised.

This dumb motherfucker is going to take all his balldo-washers down in one amazing move.

 

[The I Scream Man]

can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious

It means that either the kid got into the stash on purpose or that enough residue accumulated on surfaces to transfer

Both give big sads fuck you Rackets

 

[holyhandgrenade]

Is he even trying to hide the comparisons at this point?

Wyświetl załącznik 6101287Wyświetl załącznik 6101289

That digital art of his face is laughably bad. Did he draw it himself?

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

Interesting development right before his first real stream back. Should pair really well with his complete denial of endangering his kids.

Edit: @The I Scream Man I would assume if it was residue all the kids would have tested positive. Poor kid probably thought it was candy

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Is this legit? Someone cross reference all the names of lawyers here.

 

[False and Misleading]

https://www.nydrugtesting.com/forms/docs/hair%20drug%20panels%20and%20cutoff%20levels.pdf

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges.

If anyone doesn't want to read the chart - the child was probably powdering almost daily at those levels.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

THE COCAINE POWER LEVEL IS OVER 5000!!!

 

[Neetorino]

If this is real, then good fucking job Nick. You're actively the reason why your children will be trapped in the Foster Care system.





Also I want to thank Ms. Sweep for her hard work going through the home to help make this determination. Cope and seethe Nick, your house is a wreck.

 

[Lain of the Wired]

Who hasn't had their 9 year old get into there stash before, buncha scandinivian incels.

 

[Strix454]

We now know whose coke it was. Nick is completely vindicated. That damn Kid needs to be locked up for 25 years. What a monster. That nine year old was sneaking out and buying 25g bags of cocaine for personal use and hiding it in Nick's safe.

I hope we hear from EVS and Barnes on this situation soon.

 

[Hrothgar]

Obviously those fucking prudes at the church worked with the government to force one of Nick's kids to take cocaine. They had to assassinate the character of the biggest threat to their Scientology-like grip over rural Minnesota.

 

[AltisticRight]

Fuck you Balldo just eat a bullet.

 

[TenMilesWide]

https://www.nydrugtesting.com/forms/docs/hair%20drug%20panels%20and%20cutoff%20levels.pdf

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges.

Wait am I reading this right? this is saying the 9-year-old's hair tested positive for cocaine at levels consistent with regular/daily use? and the other kids didn't?
How does that factor in with the assumption that she wasn't personally using (ie is it easy enough to just kinda pick up that material from living in the house with it, or does this indicate that she got into the coke pile?)
Father of the year, rackets. keep it up. proud of you.

 

[DumbDude43]

what's the chance that they got the samples mixed up and the one that came back positive was actually nick or kayla?

i don't see how one kid would come back positive while all others are negative

 

[Pitbull Victim]

Is this legit? Someone cross reference all the names of lawyers here.

Lawyers appear legit:

(Edit for clarity)
Nick's lawyer:





Kayla's lawyer: