💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Balldowashers are blaming the kids so mouthbreathers like Anna can get offended when people respond regarding them. The headline is how a white bread ass nigger thought he was big time and brought an ounce of coke to where his kids sleep while he watched the mother of his children get passed around like a blunt. Everything else is just damage control and cope to deflect from his failure as a man and as a father.
Wyświetl załącznik 6038510
Wyświetl załącznik 6038511
Fuck this black and white thinking. Rekieta and Aaron can both be reprehensible at the same time, Aaron being a scumbag has no positive effect on Nick's character. Balldowashers are so disingenuous that there's really no point arguing with them, even if Nick gets jailed it'll be a conspiracy, or if we see footage of their crack den they'll claim it's just so hard to keep a family of 5 clothed and fed.

I think these people are just morally evil and use language as a sandbox to justify their beliefs. Any sane person takes the side of the kids who were clearly in an unsafe environment no matter how you interpret the evidence.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Some retard defendant shit talks the judge = The judge has a conflict of interest
I guess it's a conflict of interest to not want to be squeezed for your vagina-liquor. US law is so confusing. :stress:
Complete insanity.
Pretty evident that lawltube is just looking for anyone to pin Nick and Kayla's behavior that isn't Nick and Kayla.
Im curious if the nanny knew anything. I find it difficult to believe all this happened after she left, which leads me to wonder why she never spoke up.
Others have brought it up, and I also mentioned it a couple hundred pages back, but Nick might have made her sign NDA's. Honestly isn't out of the realm of possibility. No idea if she would have signed it or if it would be legal to do so, but how Rackets' been the last couple years I wouldn't put it passed him.
He's literally using the kids in a PR war. It's honestly fucking disgusting. He doesnt care about them, but by god will he use them as a shield.
Nick going from Nigger levels to Palestinian levels, using his kids as shields.
 
Robert Barnes & David Freiheit continue to make Nick's case of cocaine possession, & child neglect, into a Constitutional issue:
Wyświetl załącznik 6038297

Wyświetl załącznik 6038299

I do like David saying "Always bet on Barnes" after his less than stellar record in the Rittenhouse trial, or the Alex Jones trial:
Wyświetl załącznik 6038298

That is to say nothing of when Barnes implied he was representing Nicholas Sandman. To which the kid, himself, responded & asked him to stop lying:
Wyświetl załącznik 6038312
Ok, take away the money aspect and then how is Nick different from any nigger who does drugs to the point that their kids are hungry, dirty and left to their own devices?

I hope these "lawyers" will defend every dindu with the same vigor.
 
Let's not forget, Ketamine is used as a horse tranquilliser. Yikes.

Its also used medically on humans in situations where there is a need for pain control or anesthesia where nothing conventional will work. I think the most common case is on people with severe burns. Its big advantage over other things is that it can disassociate the mind from the body but not mess with breathing or the other potential risks of normal anesthesia.
One use is in severe large burns where you have to keep doing frequent wound care and changing bandages on the person.

But there are consequences with using it medically. The worst is that it can cause flashbacks in some people.
 
Jesus he really has devolved. It's like he drank from the wrong grail. Wyświetl załącznik 6038645
wasted.PNG

He really has
 
You just know that Nick is talking to his balldo washers behind the scenes, so it's noteworthy to think that attacking Nick's children seems to be the best way of getting on Nick's good side. Considering Nick seemingly blamed the children and their activities at his arrest he likely blames them for being party poopers.

"Your Honor, this case isn't about 'drug possession' or 'child neglect'... it's actually about the ethics of freeloading six year olds"
oie_JXl62PpCH9jE.png
 
Fuck this black and white thinking. Rekieta and Aaron can both be reprehensible at the same time, Aaron being a scumbag has no positive effect on Nick's character. Balldowashers are so disingenuous that there's really no point arguing with them, even if Nick gets jailed it'll be a conspiracy, or if we see footage of their crack den they'll claim it's just so hard to keep a family of 5 clothed and fed.

I think these people are just morally evil and use language as a sandbox to justify their beliefs. Any sane person takes the side of the kids who were clearly in an unsafe environment no matter how you interpret the evidence.
Anna’s entire argument and faux moral grandstanding is that Aaron is inflicting harm on the kids by telling other people what they went thru. That they might be more traumatized by seeing words about their lived experiences than they were by actually living thru it. Using that rationale would also mean the witnesses that spoke up and ultimately got them out of that situation are comparable to Nick in harm caused to them. Nick inflicted that on them, the words of a guy that made them spaghetti-os which they haven’t seen in over a month pales in comparison.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Damn freeloading kids! It's their fault Nick didn't do the 14 locals streams!

Wine Aunts, Locals (a website) v. 6 year old

edit

Youtube recommended this to me just now. Wonder if she regrets giving him that painting knowing what he became.
Wyświetl załącznik 6038719
Someone in one of the balldo threads said apparently each bottle represented a different family member. That's some Dorian Gray shit if true
 
Anna’s entire argument and faux moral grandstanding is that Aaron is inflicting harm on the kids by telling other people what they went thru. That they might be more traumatized by seeing words about their lived experiences than they were by actually living thru it. Nick inflicted that on them, the words of a guy they haven’t seen for over a month pales in comparison.
it's not 100% wrong

having junkie parents who neglect you sucks.
having the whole entire world know that your junkie parents are using drugs and balldos and your house is a dirty drug den, that makes the situation suck even more, because now it adds public humiliation and shame on top of what you already went through.
so yes, by airing their parents' dirty laundry in public aaron is indeed contributing to their suffering.

but again, the biggest culprit here is nick, because nicks streaming has been bringing shame and humiliation on his kids for years now.
like, imagine being a kid, and your peers at school (or at the homeschool group) start talking about how they saw your dad talking on stream about penetrating your mother with the fucking balldo. that's real nightmare fuel.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole