💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Friendly Potato]

I really hope this goes to trial, I'd LOVE to see Nick drunk in court.

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

Going off the latest police reports and Nick's apathy/lack of accountability what's the over/under on Nick getting his family together for one last Benoit stream?

I've thought as much for a few weeks so it's still on the cards let's hope he isn't that stupid, but he is very stupid.

 

[BPD Gunt Rider]

I assumed Nick would pay the full bail amount. He easily grifted millions over the past 3 years. Cows are so shitty with money, it's ridiculous.

 

[Scan_Lines]

Stop saying "Nick Guards" and "Nick Defenders"
Start saying "Nose Guards", "Nick Suckers" or "Balldo Washers"

Start saying "child neglecting junkie advocates"

 

[Harm]

If he shows, he gets that back minus the $5K or whatever the bail bondsman charges. It does suggest that whatever his financial situation, he doesn't have $50K lying around or he'd save the $5K and just put up the entire amount.

Maybe he can sell back some of those $10,000 impulse purchase paintings. Lol, lmao even.

Dare I say... lmfao?

So he used enough drugs to piss away all those super chats.

Let's give a toast to Nick Rekieta and his long lost toast money. May the echoes of his virulent legal commentary bounce off the desolate landscape of his dirty laundry-riddled wasteland of a crack house for years to come. His financial prosperity approaches zero as his coke usage grows to infinity. Cheers!

 

[Musashi's Son]

Man, Barnes is blocking a shitton of people apparently.

That's a 1A violation and UNCONSTITUTIONAL because he is blocking our ability to express our free speech and disagreement with his shitty opinions (see how easy it is to pull amendments from the US constitution to make shitty arguments).

 

[IRC Moron]

grain of salt.. of course
Wyświetl załącznik 6034737

Exclusive! This rumor I just started is totally legit and happening!

 

[Sharpeteer]

Maybe he can sell back some of those $10,000 impulse purchase paintings. Lol, lmao even.

I'll give him a few hundred bucks for them. I actually would.

That Depp painting, representing your absolute skyrocking to stardom? BELONGS TO ME NOW.

Sounds like he could really use the money.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

But… but my e-daddy Nick said he has gotten rid of all the alcohol in his house! Total vindication.

Date is Tuesday. So he made it through the Memorial Day weekend and then immediately ran to the bail bondsman. He probably thinks he deserves another drink.

Kayla not having paid the bond tells me it’s highly possible Kayla has retained her own counsel and this guy isn’t a fucking retard and is instructing her to stay clean.

It's very interesting to think of what this means, assuming there isn't simply a delay in Kayla's paperwork getting into MCRO.

Is it that Nick has $5k but not $10k to pay for the bond?
Does Nick just only care about himself in terms of being released from the conditions?
Or has Kayla left and is getting a separate lawyer? I mean, it's a possibility. We don't know.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

"Viva and Barnes is pushing nick like nick pushed vic." Lmfao.

 

[AnOminous]

So he went with the full 50K unconditional bond, so he could keep drinking and getting high without having to worry about random testing?

They could still do it, they just can't do it randomly without probable cause. If he did another unhinged pillstream, escalated with his vaguely threatening comments about witnesses, the judge, etc. that might be probable cause.

Or has Kayla left and is getting a separate lawyer? I mean, it's a possibility. We don't know.

Maybe Kayla will take the conditional offer. It would be interesting because if she's still in the home, they'd be able to toss HER shit and if they encountered Nick's shit while at it, probably that would be admissable.

 

[Null]

Kayla not having paid the bond tells me it’s highly possible Kayla has retained her own counsel and this guy isn’t a fucking retard and is instructing her to stay clean.

There has been no notice filed by any attorney that she is being represented. Her having conditional bond means that there's only enough money for one of them to go out doing blow and it's not going to be Kayla.

 

[hesaback]

Are they still living together or were they told to stay apart?

There's been so much info over the last week I'm starting to get confused.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

I'll give him a few hundred bucks for them. I actually would.

That Depp painting, representing your absolute skyrocking to stardom? BELONGS TO ME NOW.

Sounds like he could really use the money.

I want that big cat painting he has. I'll find a way to get it on my ceiling.

 

[NSA]

LoL poor Kayla having to stay clean and drug test! Couldn't be me!

 

[buttmunch]

 

[Burd Turglar]

He's probably cash poor.

I mean he does have that house and property to pay for on top of drugs and on top of multiple lawyers. Nigger is broke and that's not counting all the other random shit like car insurance, car payments blah blah blah.

 

[Null]

Are they still living together or were they told to stay apart?

There's been so much info over the last week I'm starting to get confused.

iirc it is unconstitutional for the courts to tell a married couple they can't have contact with each other. married couples enjoy special privileges that no other association enjoys, which is why a lot of legal requirements (like for certain company formations) explicitly do not count spouses towards employee numbers, etc.

 

[Mr. Manchester]

Doesn't Nick have that big trust fund paying out? He might be waiting for his monthly tugboat.

 

[A Little Bird]

Maybe he can sell back some of those $10,000 impulse purchase paintings. Lol, lmao even.

Haven't people speculated he bought those at over the market value for a partial tax write-off (amount paid - market value = amount tax deductible)?

If so, they probably won't be worth anything close to what he paid for them unless someone lied to the IRS about the market value, right?

Not 100% on the tax law of these kinds of things though.